If your main objective is to improve SD satellite feed, don’t waste your money on any video processor. To be honest about it, I don’t know what you can do for that. Some folks claim to see some benefits using noise reduction electronics, like the Mosquito, but I’m skeptical about that too.
I use the VP-50 and it did improve SD feed slightly, but I most definitely would not recommend that you buy it for that reason. And to spend an additional several thousand dollars for this would be foolish.
I don’t doubt the D2 is one hell of a magic box, but I suppose I’m on the other side of the fence that our French friend sits on. I just don’t like having video and audio processing in the same case. Especially with the rapidly changing technology and HDMI progression. Levesque will undoubtedly counter that with some more Anthem praise and mention upgradeability options. What he won’t tell you about is how long that will take, or how much it will cost. Yes, there are some advantages to having an all in one box, like one less HMDI handshake, and a better on screen display but again, what are you to do in a year when HDMI 1.3 is lulling you into another upgrade?? Shut your HT down for a couple months while you wait for your processor to get upgraded?
With a separate VP, you just unplug it and replace it with a new one. Same thing with the audio processor, unplug it and slide in a new one. Amps stay put indefinitely. Audio and Video processor technology is just changing too quickly nowadays.
And getting back to the audio piece, right now folks are using the LPCM function to hear “HD audio” off BR and HD disks. And right now that is being supported by the majority of BR / HD disk manufactures, but I am very doubtful they will continue with this support for much longer as HDMI 1.3 is incorporated into more devices. Pretty soon, I believe, BR and HD disks will only have the DD-HD and DTS-M formats on them which will force us to upgrade to HDMI 1.3 audio processors to decode it.
All that crystal ball rubbing and speculation aside, the point I’m trying to make is why go with an audio processor that incorporates the video processor when you are looking at separates? Hell, might as well just get yourself a receiver that has it all, VP, AP, and amps.
And NO, I am not selling or trying to persuade you into buying a stand alone VP. If anything, I’d try to convince you to save some money and get one of HDMI 1.3 receivers coming out this summer and wait until more pre pros hit the streets with HDMI audio processing. The driving factor for me to buy the VP 50 when I did, was so I could vertically stretch an HD image for my constant image height set up. At that time, the VP50 was the best choice.
You also might want to read all the Anthem AMV threads before you buy one. The D2 owners are happy at the expense and frustration of the rest of the Anthem line owners. I had a credit card in hand ready to buy an AMV 40 until I started reading these threads……