Ann Coulter living proof that stupid people can be successful

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jamie2112

Banned
She may be smart as has been said here alot but,why would a person who is SO smart be making foolish statements to the press and have gotten herself in this mess anyway.She brings all this on herself.I don't care if she has a 200 IQ she acts like an angry teenage girl when she debates.I don't like her I don't agree with her but she is still a human being and she still has the right in this country of free speach(for how much longer I don't know).Anne Coulter is a harpy and thats not going to change.Just my opinion of course....:D and this isn't political is it?
 
C

Chu Gai

Audioholic Samurai
I might not agree with you Ann - but eat something, for the love of God! You'd blow over in a stong breeze!
Jeez, Louise. First Americans take a shot for having the greatest percentage of obese people. Then you pick on Ann because she's not obese! You want to rank on an anorexic American, go pick on this one. :D

 
Rickster71

Rickster71

Audioholic Spartan
So media manipulation on her part for more notiriety?
Ultimately it looks like both sides may have made out.

Could be the University scheduled her, only to cancel her later. (or give the impression that she's too 'hateful' to have speak)
It sounds a little more like a set-up by the school; you can't organize 1,000 protesters in one day. It takes planning.

For Ann Coulter: It will also sell her books, and whip up her followers, by what may seem to some as stifling her free speech, along with the people's rights that came out to hear her.
Just a thought.
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
Ultimately it looks like both sides may have made out.

Could be the University scheduled her, only to cancel her later. (or give the impression that she's too 'hateful' to have speak)
It sounds a little more like a set-up by the school; you can't organize 1,000 protesters in one day. It takes planning.

For Ann Coulter: It will also sell her books, and whip up her followers, by what may seem to some as stifling her free speech, along with the people's rights that came out to hear her.
Just a thought.
Hmmm a game played by both parties for mutual benefits? Interesting and totally not unreasonabel to assume given the outcome.

To the university...why extend such an offer to someone as controversial as her.

To Ann, why accept the offering knowing full well that the realm of having the venue cancelled would be very high?
 
itschris

itschris

Moderator
I guess you missed the first sentence of my post, "we may not agree with her politics"


Seems odd doesn't it?
First, inflammatory Ann Coulter is put on the speaking schedule at the University of Ottawa. Why ?

Then as the date approaches, the school's academic vice president Francois Houle sends her a letter warning about Canada's hate-speech codes and possible "criminal charges."
The venue was picketed by about 1,000 yelling demonstrators, and student Web pages had been calling for violence against Miss Coulter. On Tuesday night, she was advised by security that her safety could not be guaranteed.

Why have her there in the first place? They knew what they were getting.
The reason was to manufacture a politically driven media circus.
It would be funny if it wasn't so serious and outright dispicable how the many on the left accuse others of hate, bigotry, intolerance, etc, etc. etc, when they are neck deep in the cesspool themselves and simply ignore or worse, justify their own conspicous hatred of any person or idea that differs from their own because somehow they are morally superior. You got people like Sean Penn literally saying he wished for those with opinions counter to his or who question him to die an excruciating death via rectal cancer. Hmmmm... nice.

Who do you think causes more real damage? Ann Coulter or Al Gore who literally profits handsomely through his personal business interests by spewing which are now well known and admitted to be outright lies about the environmental threats facing the globe. Yet, he continues speaking, being lauded, and lining his pockets. Do you not see the real danger in that? Much of the recoil to Coulter is her "in your face" delivery of things we are not comfortable with. It's not a pleasant fact that most of recent history's most violent terrorism has come from the hands of Muslims. It's an ugly fact, but one that is difficult to argue. It's not insighting hatred... it's saying something that is true and the individual should be allowed to decide how and to what degree to contemplate that.

I don't care if you like or don't like anyone. But at least let us be honest about it.

And as usual Rickster, you're spot on.
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Spartan
Jeez, Louise. First Americans take a shot for having the greatest percentage of obese people. Then you pick on Ann because she's not obese! You want to rank on an anorexic American, go pick on this one. :D

Two separate topics!:D But holy moly! Courtney looks like a cadaver. She could earn a few extra bucks as a prop for CSI!
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Spartan
she isnt too skinny:confused:



going to play at EHX.. to all a good day
She doesn't look too bad in that photo, but I saw a clip from her speech at the University of Western Ontario and she looked awfully thin there.
 
Nemo128

Nemo128

Audioholic Field Marshall
None of this is a bash against Ann Coulter or any other public figure, just statements of fact.

Coulter is an undergraduate at Cornell University, Coulter helped found The Cornell Review. She graduated c um laude from Cornell in 1984 with a B.A. in history, and received her J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School, where she achieved membership in the Order of the Coif and was an editor of the Michigan Law Review.
For posterity, Boston U and Notre Dame and Columbia and George Mason and Harvard are all not member schools of the Order of the Coif and are all considered more prestigious law schools that consistently rank higher than her alma mater. Not that it matters, but it proves nothing. It's a list of credentials, it says nothing about the person themselves.

In short, just because you go to an Ivy League school doesn't make you smart.
I reckon, just because someone went to school PERIOD doesn't make them intelligent or reasonable or logical or rational.

It's a bit off topic, but you're absolutely right. The level of one's education is not a reliable indicator of intelligence or knowledge. I know plenty of smart people who never went to college. I also know people with university degrees who are clueless.
Concur. If anything, I've met more reasonable and intelligent people without college educations, simply because they subconsciously force some idea on people that makes them more narrowminded to the world surrounding them. Too many people's scope of vision is limited to the view outside of their front door.

Yeah I don't get that either why U of Ottaawa booked her knowing her background. That wasn't well thought out for sure. So media manipulation on her part for more notiriety?
Would Hitler have agreed to speak in Jerusalem? Would Bin Laden hold a public forum in New York City? I'm not comparing her to either, just the idea that someone against the way of life of a people agreeing to hold public events in their homeland. She's a very outspoken critic of social services, yet she agrees to appear publically at a college in a country with universal healthcare? Opportunism in any sense is still exactly that. I wouldn't speak at a church to advocate pro-choice legislature, I wouldn't speak in favor of gun control at an NRA rally, and I wouldn't support EEO and immigrant rights at a KKK rally.

Ivy leaguer education doesn't make you smarter. :rolleyes: Just prooves you have money
Concur. Collegiate degrees, like everything we value here, are bought and sold every daily.

The greatest person I know, as far as work ethic and integrity and compassion for the world beyond her front door and open-mindedness goes, is a 27 year old single mother with two kids and no college education making barely enough money to get by. And I'd die for her.

The biggest $%#&% I personally know, in his treatment of people and family members and total disregard for the worth of other people and narrowmindedness, has two engineering PhDs (Oxford and MIT) and runs an R&D lab for one of the largest electronics manufacturers in the world.

So I guess it depends on how you judge the goodness of a person. I wouldn't call Ann Coulter stupid. I also won't call someone smart solely based on a resume.
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Spartan
Ultimately it looks like both sides may have made out.

Could be the University scheduled her, only to cancel her later. (or give the impression that she's too 'hateful' to have speak)
It sounds a little more like a set-up by the school; you can't organize 1,000 protesters in one day. It takes planning.

For Ann Coulter: It will also sell her books, and whip up her followers, by what may seem to some as stifling her free speech, along with the people's rights that came out to hear her.
Just a thought.
The cops say there were about 100 - 200 protestors and that they weren't all that belligerent. The vast majority of the crowd were there to actually see and listen to her. The fools...:rolleyes:
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
It would be funny if it wasn't so serious and outright dispicable how the many on the left accuse others of hate, bigotry, intolerance, etc, etc. etc, when they are neck deep in the cesspool themselves and simply ignore or worse, justify their own conspicous hatred of any person or idea that differs from their own because somehow they are morally superior. You got people like Sean Penn literally saying he wished for those with opinions counter to his or who question him to die an excruciating death via rectal cancer. Hmmmm... nice.

Who do you think causes more real damage? Ann Coulter or Al Gore who literally profits handsomely through his personal business interests by spewing which are now well known and admitted to be outright lies about the environmental threats facing the globe. Yet, he continues speaking, being lauded, and lining his pockets. Do you not see the real danger in that? Much of the recoil to Coulter is her "in your face" delivery of things we are not comfortable with. It's not a pleasant fact that most of recent history's most violent terrorism has come from the hands of Muslims. It's an ugly fact, but one that is difficult to argue. It's not insighting hatred... it's saying something that is true and the individual should be allowed to decide how and to what degree to contemplate that.

I don't care if you like or don't like anyone. But at least let us be honest about it.

And as usual Rickster, you're spot on.

There's a difference singleing out a person and chastizing someone for their opinions opposed to chastizing a group of people based on religous beliefs. Again, if you feel one person is representative of a whole group of people, please feel free too my misinfomed friend. I have the outlook in life.. a??holes span all religious and races and just because one encounters an a??hole or two doesn't make the whole group one. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Spartan
It would be funny if it wasn't so serious and outright dispicable how the many on the left accuse others of hate, bigotry, intolerance, etc, etc. etc, when they are neck deep in the cesspool themselves and simply ignore or worse, justify their own conspicous hatred of any person or idea that differs from their own because somehow they are morally superior. You got people like Sean Penn literally saying he wished for those with opinions counter to his or who question him to die an excruciating death via rectal cancer. Hmmmm... nice.

Who do you think causes more real damage? Ann Coulter or Al Gore who literally profits handsomely through his personal business interests by spewing which are now well known and admitted to be outright lies about the environmental threats facing the globe. Yet, he continues speaking, being lauded, and lining his pockets. Do you not see the real danger in that? Much of the recoil to Coulter is her "in your face" delivery of things we are not comfortable with. It's not a pleasant fact that most of recent history's most violent terrorism has come from the hands of Muslims. It's an ugly fact, but one that is difficult to argue. It's not insighting hatred... it's saying something that is true and the individual should be allowed to decide how and to what degree to contemplate that.

I don't care if you like or don't like anyone. But at least let us be honest about it.

And as usual Rickster, you're spot on.
This reminds me of a quote - don't ask me who said it, cause I can't remember - which goes: "the worst thing about socialism, is socialists and the worst thing is about capitalism is capitalists".

My understanding of the statement is that when people are too wrapped up in their own ideology, to the exclusion of all others, they are blind to the faults of said ideology - left vs right, religion vs atheism, etc.

As for Al Gore, he may be guilty of hypocrisy, when it comes to his lifestyle. But "outright lies"? That's a bit over the top.:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top