Alien Enemies Act of 1798

mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
This one was tossed:

>>>Still, the Florida Bar dismissed May’s complaint a day after he filed it, noting that the organization doesn’t “investigate or prosecute sitting officers appointed under the U.S. Constitution while they are in office.”<<<(emphasis added)

https://floridaphoenix.com/2025/10/14/state-supreme-court-rejects-attempt-to-force-florida-bar-to-investigate-bondi/

It's anyone's guess what will happen after she's out of office.
Thanks for bringing these legal cases up front.
 
M

Mr._Clark

Audioholic Ninja
This one was tossed:

>>>Still, the Florida Bar dismissed May’s complaint a day after he filed it, noting that the organization doesn’t “investigate or prosecute sitting officers appointed under the U.S. Constitution while they are in office.”<<<(emphasis added)

https://floridaphoenix.com/2025/10/14/state-supreme-court-rejects-attempt-to-force-florida-bar-to-investigate-bondi/

It's anyone's guess what will happen after she's out of office.
Now that Bondi bit the big one, I suspect that the Florida Bar will investigate Bondi (I also suspect that they will slow-walk it for appearance purposes).

She's reportedly moving to the private sector:

>>>Ms. Bondi, the second cabinet member to lose her job in recent weeks, said she would be taking a job in the private sector.<<<


Assuming this is true, it is somewhat surprising to me. I would have expected Trump to appoint her a position within the government in an effort to shield her from ethics investigations.

Granted, as of right now state bar associations can investigate DOJ lawyers, but the government would be in a better position to interfere is she was an active government lawyer.

>>>The Justice Department is seeking to empower Attorney General Pam Bondi to suspend state bar ethics investigations into current and former DOJ lawyers—a step outside attorneys quickly criticized as an illegal intervention into state-run processes.<<<

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-doj-pushes-to-sideline-state-bar-ethics-investigations

If Trump is intentionally throwing her to the wolves, he may come to regret it. If she's under enough pressure she might turn on Trump in an effort to avoid ethics sanctions.

From the movie End of Days:

Bobbie Chicago: "You'd be amazed what you'll agree to when you're on fire."

 
Last edited:
M

Mr._Clark

Audioholic Ninja
Now that Bondi bit the big one, I suspect that the Florida Bar will investigate Bondi (I also suspect that they will slow-walk it for appearance purposes). . . .

Assuming this is true, it is somewhat surprising to me. I would have expected Trump to appoint her a position within the government in an effort to shield her from ethics investigations. . . .

If Trump is intentionally throwing her to the wolves, he may come to regret it. If she's under enough pressure she might turn on Trump in an effort to avoid ethics sanctions. . . .
The Florida bar declined to take action on the 2025 complaint on the basis that it “does not investigate or prosecute sitting officers appointed under the U.S. Constitution while they are in office.”

>>>New Ethics Complaint Reminds Florida Bar That Pam Bondi Isn’t Attorney General Anymore . . . over 120 scholars, practitioners, and former judges signed onto a Florida bar complaint against Blanche’s former boss Pam Bondi. . . . It’s not at all clear what Bondi does these days. . . . Even if she lingers on in some quasi-official capacity, Blanche’s title bump establishes that Bondi is no longer a sitting officer appointed under the U.S. Constitution.<<<

The Florida bar is obviously trying to find reasons to avoid acting on the ethics complaints against Bondi.

I'm not sure how they can dodge this one. My best guess is that they will slow walk it and hope that a deus ex machina type event magically appears.
 
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
The Florida bar declined to take action on the 2025 complaint on the basis that it “does not investigate or prosecute sitting officers appointed under the U.S. Constitution while they are in office.”

>>>New Ethics Complaint Reminds Florida Bar That Pam Bondi Isn’t Attorney General Anymore . . . over 120 scholars, practitioners, and former judges signed onto a Florida bar complaint against Blanche’s former boss Pam Bondi. . . . It’s not at all clear what Bondi does these days. . . . Even if she lingers on in some quasi-official capacity, Blanche’s title bump establishes that Bondi is no longer a sitting officer appointed under the U.S. Constitution.<<<

The Florida bar is obviously trying to find reasons to avoid acting on the ethics complaints against Bondi.

I'm not sure how they can dodge this one. My best guess is that they will slow walk it and hope that a deus ex machina type event magically appears.
I think she may have serious cancer issue from what I read. I also read she was put back in the government. I would guess for government medical benefits.
 
M

Mr._Clark

Audioholic Ninja
. . .

Meanwhile, the dung beetle says the administration is considering suspending habeas corpus in the immigration cases. Habeas is in the Constitution, so the dung beetle is saying the administration is considering suspending the Constitution.

>>>White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said Friday that President Trump and his team are “actively looking at” suspending habeas corpus as part of the administration’s immigration crackdown.<<<

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5292820-white-house-miller-immigration-crackdown/

Once again, I can't figure out if he's so F'g stupid that he doesn't know how wrong he is, or if he knows but he's just saying it anyway. My money is on the former.

. . .

For whatever reason, the administration chose to take a highly aggressive and questionable position by invoking the AEA. Things are not going well in court so the administration is flailing about trying to find a "Super Power"
that will get them out of this mess they created.
The NY Times ran an interesting article about the Dung Beetle's efforts to talk Trump into suspending habeas corpus. Fortunately, in contrast to the Dung Beetle, Mr Scharf has a brain:

>>>Last spring, Will Scharf, an arch-conservative lawyer serving as the White House staff secretary, wrote a secret memo to the chief of staff that reflected growing unease in the West Wing about one of the extreme measures being weighed by Stephen Miller, the powerful adviser driving President Trump’s deportation campaign.

Dated April 29, 2025, and stamped “confidential,” the memo was careful and lawyerly but amounted to a warning against end-running the rule of law. The subject line read: “THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.”

Habeas corpus — the centuries-old right to force the government to justify, before a judge, why it has locked a person up — is enshrined in Article I of the Constitution. Mr. Scharf’s memo, in its unassuming way, was a blinking red warning light. The second Trump White House was deliberating an explosive new claim of presidential power: the suspension of habeas rights for unauthorized immigrants. . .

In early April last year, the Supreme Court had allowed the administration to continue its use of the Alien Enemies Act as the basis for deporting Venezuelans who were in the United States illegally. But the justices also ruled that the migrants were entitled to challenge their deportations in court before being expelled. The detainees, the court held, could file lawsuits citing habeas corpus to challenge the basis for their removal, substantially slowing the administration’s deportation drive.

Inside the White House, Mr. Miller, the influential deputy chief of staff, saw an opening for an idea he had raised previously: What if Mr. Trump simply claimed the power to suspend habeas corpus?<<<


The Dung Beetle was also pushing Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act:

>>>Suspending habeas corpus was one of two radical ideas Mr. Miller had been pushing that alarmed Mr. Scharf. The other was invoking the Insurrection Act to deploy the military to enforce the law on American streets as protests grew against deportation sweeps.

Mr. Scharf wrote confidential memos to Ms. Wiles on both topics, setting out in a low-key way why taking either step would shatter historical norms and likely precipitate hazardous legal and constitutional battles.<<<

Trump seemingly wants to do some of the exact things that led to the American Revolution. From the Declaration of Independence:

>>>[The King of Great Britain] has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. . . .

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. . . .

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures. . .

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world: <<<
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top