Search results

Well not really. Both sides of the fence have their laundry list of falsehoods and lack of transparency. But at least the current administration doesn't reject the science.

Equating the science of climate change with the falsehoods of George W Bush is not only a red herring but completely ridiculous. And BTW, "Global Warming" is the wrong term to describe what is happening. "Global Weirding" or "Climate Change" is more appropriate. The temp changes experienced...

The primary factors for manmade climate change are increases in CO2 levels followed by methane. Both of these chemicals are being released at exponential rates because of human activity. Deforestation is yet again another human activity causing increased CO2 levels and an instability in our...

WHY Are There Manmade Climate Change Deniers? This may interest you. http://www.merchantsofdoubt.org/ It deals with the influential, powerful people who probably believe in the truth, but because it isn't economically viable to their world, they introduce doubt. A look at an internal GOP...

There's one big difference. Yours are not scientific studies. The links your sending are propaganda perptuated by bloggers not scientists, political commentators not sceintists, people contracted by big oil to write junk science, not scientists. I show you studies by NASA and other peer...

And the circle of confusion continues with fake science perptuated by faux news pundents and big oil creating doubt against real science. http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2013/06/04/the-1970s-ice-age-myth-and-time-magazine-covers-by-david-kirtley/

Wrong again. The slope of the change has never been so steep since we've been dumping CO2 into the atmosphere. The kind of change we are seeing in a 100 year period normally takes 10s of thousands of years or a mass extinction event as I stated earlier. Nobody is arguing climate variation...

Irvrobinson; Sorry man I saw a double of your last posting and went to delete one as duplicate and it friggin deleted both of them. Here is your post.

Agreed extremism on both sides is bad and sadly Big Corp is really the ones running the show and dictating policy. The Citizens United ruling (a Republican idea) just makes it that much easier and less transparent. Of course once something is put into practice by either side, it rarely gets...

Yes it does matter to know the cause of it so we can at least try to change our behavior to lessen its impact. We have the science to easily determine the cause. But as Neil deGrasse pointed out, we are still in the denial phase.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11644-climate-myths-it-was-warmer-during-the-medieval-period-with-vineyards-in-england.html#.VRMky44eruc

B/C the free market is driven by profit not by protecting us or our environment. There is far more profit in keeping the Status Quo then to completely revamp our energy production. The funding you are talking about is peanuts compared to the major expenditures of our government.

Again there is a scientific consensus on the cause. There is no majority disagreement among qualified climate scientists on this. Yes the primary cause is manmade increase in CO2. you can compare the PPM CO2 rise and see the correlation of recent temperature increases. Watch this little...

Really so you're going to equate a right winger blogger who isn't a scientist with a panel of peer reviewed people that are just b/c the government funds them to exist? By your logic the only science that can be trusted is the one that has NO funding at all. Research costs money. People have...

Galcier ice exists in multiple regions of the planet and have been studied. The most extreme temperature variations that we've been recording happen at the polar extremes. You melt the ice, it doesn't reflect as much sun and the oceans absorb the heat and also get more acidic. It's a feedback...

We have very accurate historical data on temperatures and atmospheric compositions for 100's of thousands of years through glacial ice. This is a very established science. There is no slowing down of temp rise. The temp rise over the last century is MUCH more significant than it's been over...

It's obvious you don't have a science background to make such claims. If you truly understood what it meant to follow a strict scientific protocol or 3rd party peer review and the meaning of a scientific concensus than you wouldn't be making such claims. Crap NASA says there is 97% consensus...

How can anyone share NON political thoughts about a piece that was written by a highly politicized and highly biased individual with vested interest to discredit manmade climate change?

Really, he has no vested interest either? He's not just a hired shill to again confuse the science to the general public? hmm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Moore_(environmentalist) In a December 2007 press release from his Greenspirit firm, Moore was quoted as saying, "It's...