Hello Friends,
I have been a lurker on this website for awhile and it’s my first entry. I have found the threads and info pages fascinating. Excuse my long entry, but I am looking for some help and have some questions.
I am more of an audio than video enthusiast, and my question(s) are targeting towards a little different application than the usual audio. My interest(s) and application(s) are digital piano and digital church (pipe) organ. I have both at my house. I would really be interested in some feedback. My questions are going to be related towards the piano.
When I am referring to a digital piano, I am not referring to a Walmart toy, I have a Kawai CA-63 that is considered an upper grade instrument in that market. It ran ~ $2700. Its touch, action, and resonances are really close to an actual piano and beside the realistic look, the former attributes are what drove me to the instrument. But one of the great downfalls in 99% of the digital piano’s is their inability to produce pure lifelike audio. The timber is realistic to an acoustic piano, but the audio output never seems to stack up. Unless one can fork over about $15K for Yamaha Avant Grand, digital pianos always seem fall short.
According to the Kawai manual:
Audio: 50w x 2
Speakers: 5” (13cm) x 2 / 2 (5cm) x 2
The manual states the piano has two full range and two tweeters.
One issue that has been driving me nuts is the middle registers; key C3 (130hz) – B4 (493 hz). When I would play above or below those keys the sound is quite satisfying. But in those middle registers it’s twangy. Instead of the sound of the felt hammer hitting the string, it’s like a spoon hitting a pan. I worked all over the EQ settings within the piano and couldn’t come up with a good combination. Although, when I plugged in my Sennheisers, the piano was beautiful through the headphones. I hooked up the earphone jack and played through my desktop PC (2.1;, not bad. When I used the piano’s internal recorder, saved to a USB, and played the USB through a media player I was quite impressed, some nuances but on a scale of 1-10, I gave an 8. My problem though, I still had that twangy / bang-bang sound when I played through the piano’s internal audio. I don’t know why that is happening, maybe some of you may have an idea.
I tried going the virtual route and I got just as frustrated. A lot of the VST packages are memory hogs, not enough RAM, too much CPU load, lag time issues, not compatible with this or that sound card etc. Forget It! I stumbled across a couple Home Theater and Audio forums and started reading with the thought of if “I want good sound I should listen to the guys who know how to make good sound and use products that are designed to make good sound.” I began to wonder since the sound through headphones is good what if I had a set of quality stereo speakers and run as a 2 channel with externals. The problem is I didn’t have an amp to use.
Recently I had won a raffle at my work and one of the prizes that I could pick was a 2.1 sound bar. So I took that one (Sharp SL-70) and hooked up to the piano output to see if I solved my problem. It was AWFUL!!!! It sounded like two soup cans and bailing wire. When I ran the volume up on the piano the sound was worse than the internal piano and all the sub did was go thud-thud-thud. So my frustrations set me back more.
To see if the problem was a bad sound bar amp or were the speakers really that bad. I then got a hold of a pair of Bose 100’s (yes they’re old) to see if the sound would improve. I hooked the speakers to the 2.1 sub and to my surprise it was a vast improvement. Although the sub didn’t really have much affect the sound was going through to the speakers was quite nice. Not only was the sound better, but the twang that I was hearing before was gone. At about a 4 on the volume slider, the piano sounded much more lifelike. I had to put the 100’s back. Thus I started reading your guys audio advice and began looking for speakers. I bought a pair of Definitive Technology SM-45’s. I hooked them up to the sub, and it was love at first note. Not only is the timbre clear and lifelike, with the SM-45’s you even feel the note as the felt hammer would hit the string. There was weight in the keys, the base was throaty, the middle clear, and upper register were harp like. This digital piano has a lot of adjustments for string and damper resonance and the SM-45’s do an excellent job picking that up. The sub has really no effect on the sound. I get more bass from the speakers, so I am using the sub as a driver for the speakers. According to the SM-45 specs, only five lower keys are not covered in their frequency response; A0 (27hz) – C#1 (34hz), but I can’t tell any drop off what so ever.
Now I have some questions for you experts. First, is it plausible for me to continuing running the sound system this way? My practice room is really about the size of a bedroom. I measured, it’s approximately 900 cu ft. The reason I ask, is I bought (Radio Shack) Sound Meter and based on what I have I set up (the volume where the meter is 39 inches from the speakers) when playing it would register ~86-92db. OUCH! It seemed a little loud. What my surprise was how little I had to move the volume slider up to get that kind volume. The volume slider barely needs to get to a 2 and I am getting that kind of power. I tried the pink noise test on the individual front channels of my basement surround system and I was up at -25db (from a bottom -70db) on the volume control to get that kind of reading. Before, when I tried to get that kind of volume on the piano audio system I had to run the slider to 6. Is it the SM-45’s are that much more efficient than what the piano speakers, 2.1 soundbar, or Bose 100 speakers are? (BTW: Those Model 100’s weren’t bad, but they were somewhat directional. If I was stuck with them I would’ve used them). I just want to make sure I am not overlooking something and possibly creating a bigger problem in the future. (ie Overdrive - burnout the 2.1 sub/amp or blow the speakers) I really don’t have the room or space for a surround sound amp and big sub. My hope is if I keep the volume slider down where it’s at I should be quite safe. This should be no different than the analog out from a tv. I’d like to get a second opinion.
Also am I measuring PSL correctly? I am assuming that 39 in @ 90db is 1 watt. If I am correct I am amazed I am getting that high of an output that is so clear for so little input from the piano. I would also like to find out why the piano’s internal audio has such a twangy sound at those middle registers.
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
By the way, the piano is about 8” from the wall. I recently set the volume slider a little lower to get about 82-88db when sitting at the bench. Much more comfortable! I also towed the speakers in a bit and because one of the big mistakes that I believe the digital piano manufacturers make is the speaker placement fires low to the floor and high at your ears. A real acoustic piano generates sound behind the music rack. By adjusting the toe I am getting about 86 – 93 db behind the music rack, while getting the mid 80’s at the bench. With the resonances and louder sound emitting from behind the rack than firing at the bench it is truly more realistic.
I don’t believe one can truly replace the sound of a “real” 9”-10”concert grand with a digital, but I have sat at several good sized uprights and grand pianos in personal homes, and the digital now sounds really close and in some comparisons I feel it sounds better. There have been two people who said it sounds better than their acoustic upright. I guess I will now look at digital pianos like buying a HDTV. Don’t buy the tv for the sound, leave that to the sound producing equipment, same with the digital piano.
Any feedback to the above would be greatly appreciated.