I looked around for a bit and then based on a top ten review I looked at the Polk 265-LS over many others including the RT version of same speakers... Was told the LS are noticeably more expensive and sound much better with a decent AVR. LS are 33kHz highs and RT are 28kHz....
So some on here said KEF or revel over Polk. Why? I don't know much about the tests to prove they're better, so anyone with experience? What about someone that has owned the Polk LS in-wall or in-ceiling speakers... The set I want would be $1,400 for 5 speakers, two of the 265-ls fronts, the 255-ls center and 2 in-ceiling 80FX/LS all vanishing grilles, paintable.
Am I out of my mind to get the Onkyo 1010 and polk LS series? I want to buy the AVR I can use down the road with bigger and better along with 2nd zone/hdmi outs.. Or get Denon 3313?
So in the review on top ten reviews for 2013, they beat out some decent companies. So with the fact I can get the LS 5 speakers for just $1,400 and the nice look, I really need some feedback on why not.? I would like to get the Denon 3313 or Onkyo 1010 AVR. Was told to spend more on speakers and less on AVR.
SO here are rankings as per top ten 2013 in wall speakers
#1 Polk Audio 265-LS overall (9.65)
#2 Martin Logan Passage (9.35)
#3 Premier Acoustics PA-626 (9.25)
#4 Klipsch KL-6504-THX (9.18)
#5 Yamaha NS-IW660 (8.93)
#6 Polk Audio 65-LS (discontinued) (8.83)
#7 PSB CW28 (8.65)
#8 Klipsch KL-6502-THX (8.30)
#9 Yamaha NS-IW470 (7.80)
#10 PSB CW26 (7.78)
Out of 10 the polk was ranked 9.65. stats below, so please rebut...
Product Specifications:
Lowest Frequency Response: (Hz) 28
Highest Frequency Response: (kHz) 33
Sensitivity (dB): 91
Nominal Impedance: 8 ohms
Minimum Amplifier Power: 10
Maximum Amplifier Power: 200
Dimensions:
Height (inches): 20.9
Width (inches): 8.9
Depth (inches): 3.5
Weight (pounds): 9