skizzerflake

skizzerflake

Audioholic Field Marshall
Damn this is intense...more sweat, dirt, blood and testosterone per second than any movie I have seen for a while. Ralph Fienne's terrific directorial debut tells the more or less true story of a turncoat 5th century BC Roman general, from the history of Livy and Plutarch, through the language of Shakespeare, but in a contemporary setting. Coriolanus returns victorious to Roma wants to be Tribune (an elected position) but detests the common folk that would elect him (like crows snapping at eagles, Shakespeare said) as he also detests the interference of other high ranking politicians, who would use him, so he betrays all and takes his martial skills over to the enemy.

I'm always somewhat leery about people recasting Shakespeare into other times (Hamlet in Hollywood, etc), but this works really well. I suspect that Fiennes lives in awe of The Bard. If you have not read about this you will begin to suspect that it was filmed in the former Yugoslavia (Serbia to be specific), where the sort of intractable wars the Romans fought are still recent history. Murder, passion, scheming and betrayal are the stuff of everyday life in this Rome. There's no Emperor with great legions yet, and the Republic hangs by a thread.

This is not an easy movie. Being done in Shakespeare's language, it needs attention and unless you are experienced, you will probably still miss at least a third of the dialog. There is no comic relief. I did notice, however, that as the climax approached, NOBODY was getting more popcorn, shifting in their seats, texting or anything else. The rest of the audience, along with me, was completely absorbed. The cast is absolutely on target; Fiennes (as Coriolanus), Brian Cox, Venessa Redgrave, Gerard Butler and Jessica Chastain are all excellent and really throw themselves into the drama. If you're in the mood for something really deep and intense, this is highly recommended...if not, step over to the next theater and see John Carter.
 
Last edited:
Adam

Adam

Audioholic Jedi
Thanks for the review!

I gotta say, when I saw the title, I first thought of Cornholio. "I need TP for my bunghole! Are you threatening me?" :)
 
skizzerflake

skizzerflake

Audioholic Field Marshall
Thanks for the review!

I gotta say, when I saw the title, I first thought of Cornholio. "I need TP for my bunghole! Are you threatening me?" :)
This is definitely one where it helps to have paid attention when you were forced to get through English Lit in school.
 
Alex2507

Alex2507

Audioholic Slumlord
I just spent an hour or so reading and renting a bunch of movies you reviewed in hopes of broadening my horizons. This is at the top of my Que. Is there ANY nudity in this?
 
skizzerflake

skizzerflake

Audioholic Field Marshall
I just spent an hour or so reading and renting a bunch of movies you reviewed in hopes of broadening my horizons. This is at the top of my Que. Is there ANY nudity in this?
I don't recall any nudity. Where it is hard core, however, is that it's full bore Shakespeare, no notable revised language. It does have 20 century costumes, but that's almost irrelevant since the story transfers well. War, treachery,emotion and betrayal are eternal.
 
Alex2507

Alex2507

Audioholic Slumlord
I don't recall any nudity. Where it is hard core, however, is that it's full bore Shakespeare, no notable revised language. It does have 20 century costumes, but that's almost irrelevant since the story transfers well. War, treachery,emotion and betrayal are eternal.
It's very kind of you to answer that question seriously however I was kidding. At the least it made me laugh and that's the first part of any joke.

I'll get to see if I can handle the language of the movie. Netflix thinks I'm going to not like it (2.2/5) while the average is 2.9/5 and I'm pretty sure my g/f will hate it but she likes that Butler guy from 300 so I'll just say I was thinking of her when I rented it and it's not my fault he sucks. My movie picking abilities are always under close scrutiny.

Thanks very much for the various reviews. Netflix has now recommended a variety of odd indie flicks based on the recent odd additions to my Que. I needed something to shake things up a bit.
 
Last edited:
skizzerflake

skizzerflake

Audioholic Field Marshall
I don't think it's an audience pleaser for the general weekend, teen popcorn crowd, but IF you like The Bard (I love his stuff), it's a good chance to see a play that doesn't otherwise get much air time.

Netflix is surprising sometimes. They are not comprehensive, but I've randomly run across a lot of obscure and interesting indie and foreign films there. If you just browse with a blank mind, you can find some real delights. They are often transient, so you need to catch them while they're available. My wife was frustrated that she'd have to wait years for the rest of the Dragon Tattoo trilogy until I pointed her to the Swedish versions, which have been out for several years. The first installment was duplicated shot by shot (even using some of the same sets) in the American version, so if you can deal with subtitles, you can see the whole thing now and it's excellent. It works well in Swedish with subtitles, since it is set in Sweden, and because it's NOT a verbose film. Noomi Rapace was a better Lizbeth, IMO and all 3 films are excellent. Other oddities show up there for a while, including old classic silents, classic American noir films, etc. It's great to venture out of the cinematic mainstream.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top