Best Speakers for $2000 to $3000

R

ridfighter

Audioholic Intern
Hi Thanks all of yall for your input, i have a question, what is the best speakers, doesnt matter if its used, refurbished or new (floorstanders with a center channel) between $2000 to $3000, i love bowers and wilikins and paradigm brands, i do understand these brands are expensive but maybe used? i do listen to a lot of slow rock, pop, techno, 80s basically all kinds of music and i love to feel the effect of a good sub which brings me to the next question, whats the best sub for the price range of $500 to $1000, so basically i am looking for a center channel, left and right floorstanders and a powerful Sub for the price range between $3000 to $4000, Thanks
 
N

Nuance AH

Audioholic General
Hi Thanks all of yall for your input, i have a question, what is the best speakers, doesnt matter if its used, refurbished or new (floorstanders with a center channel) between $2000 to $3000, i love bowers and wilikins and paradigm brands, i do understand these brands are expensive but maybe used? i do listen to a lot of slow rock, pop, techno, 80s basically all kinds of music and i love to feel the effect of a good sub which brings me to the next question, whats the best sub for the price range of $500 to $1000, so basically i am looking for a center channel, left and right floorstanders and a powerful Sub for the price range between $3000 to $4000, Thanks
How big is your room? Is this primarily for music and will this serve as a dual purpose system (HT and music)? Do you listen very loud?

Salk Sound and Philharmonic Audio would be my choice, but YMMV. Ascend, Paradigm, B&W, Revel and Kef are some other great options. I'll throw in Definitive Technology and Klipsch for the fanboys here too. :)

For subs I'd look into the DIY route, otherwise Rythmik, SVS, HSU or Epik. JL Audio makes the best consumer subwoofers IMO (for music), but you'd have to go used and it would probably break your budget.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
For sure, you must audition and compare various brands. The only way you will get the idea of what is "best" is to compare.

You say you like B&W & Paradigm. What have you compared them to?

KEF? Revel? DefTech? NHT? Focal? Salk? Philharmonic? Ascend?

For subwoofers in the $1000 range, I would get dual Rythmik FV12 Direct Servo subwoofers @ $500 each.

So that leaves you $3K for the front 3 towers.

What is your requirement of the center speaker? Does it need to be horizontal? What kind of dimensions does it need to be? Can it be also a tower speaker?:D

If you have compared those B&W and Paradigm to all or most of the other speakers and still think the B&W and Paradigm sound better, then get some B&W and paradigm either used or brand new @ 20% off.:D
 
Z

zumbo

Audioholic Spartan
All pricey, but fantastic stuff.

I would put the MB Quart 830 up against any of those brands in a similar 2.5 design, and even some of the 3-way multi-driver sets. The darn things are just fantastic.
 
jinjuku

jinjuku

Moderator
Three Zaph Revelator 2.5's. I would put money that they will eat the breakfast, lunch, and dinner of anything you are looking at commercially in your price range. None of them are going to have the anything near the driver quality of the Scan Speaks.

Pair them with a Rythmik sub.
 
slipperybidness

slipperybidness

Audioholic Warlord
Look into the Goldenear Triton 2 or the def tech BP Supertowers. Both have built in subs and amps in each tower. Advantages and Disadvantages to each one.

AccuDefTech probably said it best in a previous thread: These are fun speakers if nothing else.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Look into the Goldenear Triton 2 or the def tech BP Supertowers. Both have built in subs and amps in each tower. Advantages and Disadvantages to each one.

AccuDefTech probably said it best in a previous thread: These are fun speakers if nothing else.
I think the DefTech bipolar are between the ultra accurate speakers and the ultra inaccurate speakers in terms of FR.:D

The 2 exceptions I know of is the SM450 & Mythos STS, which were measured to be very flat.

For example, the BP7001SC & BP7000SC are more like +/-3.5dB, instead of +/- 2dB from 200Hz-10kHz, whereas the MLESL measures +1.05/–6.27 decibels from 200 hertz to 10 kilohertz, Vienna Acoustic Beethoven Baby Grand measures +2.84/–6.48 decibels from 200 hertz to 10kHz, Vienna Acoustic Music measures +3.49/–6.02 decibels from 200 hertz to 10 kilohertz, B&W 803D measures +1.90/–3.68 decibels from 200 hertz to 10 kilohertz, and also others like Sonus faber, Wilson, Zu, Magnepan, Mirage, who don't quite fit the +/-3dB FR.

MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL Speaker System HT Labs Measures | Home Theater
Vienna Acoustics Beethoven Baby Grand Speaker System HT Labs Measures | Home Theater
Vienna Acoustics Klimt Speaker System HT Labs Measures | Home Theater
Vienna Acoustics Klimt Speaker System HT Labs Measures | Home Theater
B&W 803D Speaker System HT Labs Measures | Home Theater


What the powered bipole seem to "lack" in ultra accuracy, they gain in the much larger 3D soundstage and bass output.

The point here is that some speakers still sound great to us, even if they don't measure flat like +/-2dB.
 
N

Nuance AH

Audioholic General
I think the DefTech bipolar are between the ultra accurate speakers and the ultra inaccurate speakers in terms of FR.:D
.
What the powered bipole seem to "lack" in ultra accuracy, they gain in the much larger 3D soundstage and bass output.

The point here is that some speakers still sound great to us, even if they don't measure flat like +/-2dB.
All subjective.:D Bipolar uses the room to gain that expanded 3D soundstage, but what if the room acoustics are crap? I suspect such a speaker would suffer worse than a direct radiating one in a bad room. Oh, and I'm not just talking Def Tech here; this applies to the Mirage's, Phil's, SoundScapes and other non-direct radiators.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
All subjective.:D Bipolar uses the room to gain that expanded 3D soundstage, but what if the room acoustics are crap? I suspect such a speaker would suffer worse than a direct radiating one in a bad room. Oh, and I'm not just talking Def Tech here; this applies to the Mirage's, Phil's, SoundScapes and other non-direct radiators.
I agree. They may be harder to place in some rooms. I think room size matters most.

I thought the Soundscape is a monopole?

The Philharmonic uses the dipole planar midrange, whereas the Soundscape uses the monopole Accuton midrange?
 
N

Nuance AH

Audioholic General
I agree. They may be harder to place in some rooms. I think room size matters most.

I thought the Soundscape is a monopole?

The Philharmonic uses the dipole planar midrange, whereas the Soundscape uses the monopole Accuton midrange?
Wouldn't the SoundScape be considered a dipole due to the open-back midrange chamber?:confused: Perhaps not because it doesn't actually fire toward the rear, eh? It's a unique design for sure. How about we call it a semipole? LOL!
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Wouldn't the SoundScape be considered a dipole due to the open-back midrange chamber?:confused: Perhaps not because it doesn't actually fire toward the rear, eh? It's a unique design for sure. How about we call it a semipole? LOL!
We need to have Dennis clarify this.:D

I don't recall anywhere on the Soundscape website that says it is a dipole design!

What is the purpose of the open back cabinet if the Soundscape is not a dipole speaker?

Inquiring minds want to know.:eek::D
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top