Unfortunately, I'm limited to items I can plug in (point of use) since I live in military housing.
Point of use protectors, in some cases, reduces protection already inside appliances. The word 'protector' does not means 'protection'.
Who pays for your electricity? If you do, then a superior solution is available from the electric company. Or install a kludge. Protectors close to appliances and farther from earth ground are ineffective. May even contribute to damage of any appliance on that circuit - connected to or not connected to that power strip.
Locate a receptacle closest to the breaker box. Cut its cord as short as possible (every foot means less protection). Connect that protector to that receptacle. Now that protector is closer to earth and farther from the appliance. Both mean better protection.
An IEEE brochure is quite blunt. TV1 was plugged into a 'point of use' protector. Distance to earth was excessive. So that protector earthed a surge 8000 volts destructively through nearby TV2. Once inside, then a surge selects which appliance to destroy; which appliance makes a better connection to earth. In the IEEE brochure, 8000 volts destructively through TV2.
Above cannot be explained in a soundbyte. Rereading it might be necessary.
A protector too close to appliances can present a surge with more paths destructively through nearby appliances. Power strip protectors sometimes make damage easier. Dr Martzloff's 1994 IEEE paper is blunt about damage due to 'point of use' (plug-in) protectors. His first conclusion:
> Conclusion:
> 1) Quantitative measurements in the Upside-Down house clearly show objectionable
> difference in reference voltages. These occur even when or perhaps because, surge
> protective devices are present at the point of connection of appliances.
Get a utility installed ‘whole house’ protector. Or modify and relocate that ‘point of use’ protector where it might do some protection.