Don't be smartass, No one here is set vs proving additional opinion. I'm not sure how much audio background you have and some of your suggestions to OP seems sub-optimal and OP seemed to really
As far as audio background professionally - none. As far as PC based sound and video systems - a decent amount both professionally (20years) and personally.
I apologize for the quick retort... my response was more from the perception that you were quick to dismiss - but without anything (at that time) to add. I was thinking/hoping from my admittedly short time here that this was a different place from a certain other well-known audio forum which I have frequented for years - and I admit to jumping to a conclusion based on your response. Add to that the fact that I am also a 'Bored SysAdmin' who is in the middle of a weekend-long rollout of a new AR system... and I tend to get a little edgy (on my 4th pot of coffee).
As for sub-optimal the OP seems to be severely space limited - hence hesitant to have an AVR + passives as his solution. I assume that also means that having a 5.1 system would also be
much too large given space constraints. Do you feel that movies can
only be enjoyed (even sitting at a computer) with a full 5.1 or 7.1 surround setup? Also, perhaps I'm reading into it more than I should but I get the feeling that this is a dual-purpose room (bedroom,den,etc.) and that Dayton sub, although great bang for the buck is like 18in cube which is pretty big and which would easily overpower a small room wouldn't it?
NOTE: I'm not trying to be argumentative... I really am just curious as I also have never had a big enough desk/office to have a full 5.1 surround system with AVR+passives - although I do run an AVR.. but just to 2 monitors... and don't even run a sub because the bass on the nearfields is good enough IMO for games/movies at my desk, not to mention I would lose all of my legroom since I have file cabinets and PCs everywhere else in the room. How large a subwoofer do you run in your office and do you have 5 passives there or?? In any case I'm sure I would be very jealous.
I wholeheartedly agree on the Behringer's being great monitors at the price. I'm looking at a pair as I write this in my 2nd office. However, I personally will be looking for something much smaller than the AVR I currently use when I move and have a smaller office once again.
I guess I should have been more reserved in my suggestions considering all of the conflicting information - i.e. first truly good sound, then gaming/movies, then ipod connectivity, finally for listening to mp3s of unknown bitrates... which would probably sound just as good on a $10 pair of headphones.
@raytyej - yes, and no. A higher bitrate lossy encode (.mp3/.aac/.wma) will sound better than a lower one. But just as with the lossy-to-lossless question, once a song has been encoded at a particular bitrate - that's as good as it can get. You would need to re-rip the original lossless/CD file at the higher rate to get better sound. However, if you are doing that - just rip it as a lossless file or keep it as one.
If you need to use AAC or MP3 on your iPod because you can't fit everything in a lossless format you can easily use a utility like dbPowerAmp batch converter to make them from the lossless rips - and then listen to the lossless files while sitting at your computer. Or you can do like I do and just copy 30-40 albums worth of lossless files to your iPod and when you get tired of listening to those - wipe it and refill it with a different 30-40.