i was bored so i made this

C

craig7

Senior Audioholic
the ultimate home theater, maybe

120" panasonic tv 18" subwoofers


3 htpc's


behind the seats, 5 18" subs


in the walls, 4 3 way speakers with 2 10" woofers, and a 2" tweeter


sony STR-DH700 7.1 receiver (very similar to the one i have), VCR, TIVO, Xbox 360 elite, ps3, blueray player.


buttkicker tactile transducers under every seat


9 subwoofers, 20 10" woofers, 10 2" tweeters, 3 1.5" tweeters, 6 8" woofers, 7 tactile transducers




took me 4 hours
 
lsiberian

lsiberian

Audioholic Overlord
Why in the world would you have a sony avr in there????:eek::eek: :D:D
Yeah I didn't even see that. You gotta have a pre-pro and a stack of pro-amps in there.

Not to mention no PJ?

You gotta have a PJ, vertical center behind an AT screen. I'd use those klipsch surround speakers for surrounds. Maybe the B&W 802d's for the fronts.
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
It includes a Sony receiver. Definitely NOT ultimate.

As mentioned, those subs are probably not going to work well the way they are setup.
 
C

craig7

Senior Audioholic
i can download a pre made emotiva xpa-5, would that work?
edit: they look the same so ill just use the xpa 5 and put xpa 1 on it :p
 
C

craig7

Senior Audioholic
You are going to need a bit more than one XPA-5. That might handle one side of the room; you have like 15 speakers in there :). For a home system, most likely don't need that many either. 7 would easily be plenty for an enclosed, treated room.
yea but this is about complete overkill, right now its 10.2, i want to do 22.2
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
I know, it is fun to play around with this stuff and props for the effort and taking it to the next level :D In reality though, I shoot for the simplest system that can get the job done well. Fewer components to do the job means fewer things to go wrong :)
 
C

craig7

Senior Audioholic
I know, it is fun to play around with this stuff and props for the effort and taking it to the next level :D In reality though, I shoot for the simplest system that can get the job done well. Fewer components to do the job means fewer things to go wrong :)
soo true :cool:
 
C

craig7

Senior Audioholic
Why 3 HTPC's? I'd go for one fully loaded mac pro :D
i was going to use one but i coldnt find a good model of one but i got one for it now, it is really mindblowing how awesome the mac pros can be
 
C

craig7

Senior Audioholic
and since were doing overkill, im thinkin, 3 mac pros, 32gb ram each, 4tb hdd each. just them alone wopuld be about $90,000 because each of them would be about $28,000
 
C

craig7

Senior Audioholic
my new additions


12 xpa-1's


2 subs in each corner


Two 2.93GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon “Westmere” (12 cores)
32GB (8x4GB)
2TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
2TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
2TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
2TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
Two ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB
Two 18x SuperDrives
 
Davemcc

Davemcc

Audioholic Spartan
You are going to need a bit more than one XPA-5. That might handle one side of the room; you have like 15 speakers in there :). For a home system, most likely don't need that many either. 7 would easily be plenty for an enclosed, treated room.

When you throw around terms like "Ultimate", I am thinking more along the lines of this:



http://stranger-worlds.blogspot.com/2010/09/most-expensive-home-theater-6-million.html
I think I'd go with this one but I would have to clean it and reorganize to suit my style.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top