I suspect that you are being dense. The room doesn't just factor in at some point, it's where it starts, period.
I see you're jumping on the proverbial virtual harassment bandwagon as well, as it appears to be quite addictive like a rabid virus 'round parts like these (just look at what most of the threads degrade into -- say, the debacle about power conditioners which spiraled downward into a pissing match between so-called "engineering specialists"...okay, right) but, no, you're wrong -- I'm not being dense. How can one "suspect" one of "being dense" anyway? What I was merely pointing out in that reply -- which you strategically clipped and quoted to match the original member's statement with regard to this, as you're obvious been zapped by the aforementioned harassment livewire dangling in the other thread, for no reason other than this -- was that my original title of the thread was meant as what it was. All I am saying, once again, is that I have heard countless times that when it comes to the electronics chain, it's the SPEAKERS that matter the most before amplification or anything else -- so why am I dense for choosing that for a title thread?
Yes, we knew what you meant, and what you meant is simply incomplete by a long shot; incorrect.
So, why wasn't this "expert rhetoric" you're spitting at me with such distain offered to the dozens of other so-called "resident experts" here alone that continue to demand an audience with the pope, for loss of a better term, to explain that THEY feel it's the SPEAKERS that matter in the electronics chain? Further, what I said may be "incomplete," but I wasn't getting into semantics about room factor -- I was beginning to shop for speakers thinking THEY were the next logical step up in the ELECTRONICS chain.
Did you know OVER half what you hear is the room? Some experts say it's closer to 70% of the equation.
Yes, I've heard that. Don't know if it's from the same self-appointed "experts" as you're suggesting here, but I have heard that theory -- still, my position stands: My thread was started to discuss the fact that in the ELECTRONICS CHAIN, the speakers, I have been told, are the more important element to consider...
The NUTSHELL of audio (and is often described as so) is simply the speakers and their INTERACTION with the room.
Good enough. But we're talking about MY situation in which really crap speakers need to be replaced taking the room OUT of the equation and I'd like to start THERE for an upgrade plan.
I don't know why you so blithely ignore what I have to offer, when I have previously been so extremely patient and helpful to you, for example, here are some posts in ONE thread, ten of which are directed towards you, and click on any of them, and none of them are short posts.
When did I what you call "blithely ignore" what you have to offer? Did I sleep through some kind of "ignore every jostenmeat comment that's made!" swearing in ceremony somewhere? That's just wrong.
Anyways, my previous single post in this thread was genuinely offered as help.
That's fine, and if it was meant with those intentions, even better -- but when did I ever ignore the advice you gave? Was it because I didn't DO exactly what you said I should? That's confusing suggestion with being a bit arrogant in someone's opinions -- something that's too often running rampant on boards such as these.
Feel free to put me on ignore as well.
Well, before I meet your immaturity level and deal with that, let's find out where I completely ignored your advice -- where? What part? I made a list of EVERY SINGLE SPEAKER that EVERY SINGLE MEMBER suggested in THIS THREAD alone.
