Stalker? (let's talk about chicklets)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ares

Ares

Audioholic Samurai
Hey Guys, I think Ashley is watching because every pic that MatthewB posted has disappeared. Also if this dude has been out of work for decades how is he affording all his gear?
 
Ares

Ares

Audioholic Samurai
I think you miss the point, your suppose to say "Impressive" or "Most Impressive":D
 
s162216

s162216

Full Audioholic
No doubt getting it all from the money he gets from all the 'benefits' that our stupid last government gave to about everyone under the sun for any reason it seems and naturally every taxpayer is funding.

Its only like last year when it was found that a family of I think it was Iraqi refugees were found to be living in a nice expensive apartment with everyone having a nice expensive smartphone, a Nintendo DS, and designer clothing. And it doesn't end there, they had a 70" LCD with a PS3, Wii and Xbox 360 and a whole load of other expensive stuff. None of them worked and when asked by a reporter how they afforded all the stuff, they replied 'benefits' as none of them could be bothered to work.

Hopefully our new government will stop this sort of thing.
 
Ares

Ares

Audioholic Samurai
I'm in the wrong country, I had to work hard and end up getting laid off, then had to fight like a rabid dog to get anything. sorry for changing the topic Yepi we can now resume to picking on.........I mean discussing your Stalker.
 
s162216

s162216

Full Audioholic
Easy solution with this guy, shoot on sight. Just every time he is noticed on a forum that hes been previously banned from ban him again especially if he harassing people.
 
Y

yepimonfire

Audioholic Samurai
I'm in the wrong country, I had to work hard and end up getting laid off, then had to fight like a rabid dog to get anything. sorry for changing the topic Yepi we can now resume to picking on.........I mean discussing your Stalker.
im all for thread derailation. :D
 
jeffsg4mac

jeffsg4mac

Republican Poster Boy
As everyone has stated, the guy is a complete and utter idiot with that mess he created. One would have much better results just wiring for left minus right difference for the back channels off a stereo source. His setup is the funniest thing I have ever seen in all my years in this hobby.
 
Y

yepimonfire

Audioholic Samurai
i know it had me laughing so hard it wasnt funny, i actually have a receiver that has a button that does what you explained.
 
Y

yepimonfire

Audioholic Samurai
i know it had me laughing so hard it wasnt funny, i actually have a receiver that has a button that does what you explained.
Here's an instructional video on how to use Ashley's system.

 
M

MatthewB.

Audioholic General
I can kind of see where Ashley was headed at the beginning, but then he just went way of course. From my understanding he used to be a projectionist in the early 80's for a small theater in Bournemouth when simulated surround sound came out and the light kind of went on, but for him, he felt he could take it to the next level and be ahead of the game. Only one problem is the sound engineers were decades ahead of him and came out with dedicated 5.1 channel sound while he was still matrixing his original mono and stereo sources and somehow convinced himself that what he was doing was better than dedicated 5.1 channel.

We asked him years ago about DD/DTS and he said it had it's place but felt what he did was far more immersive. I do have to give him credit, when I saw PLiiz and saw the height channels, it was Ashley who I thought of, but as mentioned PLiiz matrixed (properly mind you) the height channels from the main channels, where as Ashley has leaped ten paces back to make one step forward and is too stubborn to realize what he is doing is wrong. For the size of his small room, he would be so much better with a straight DD/DTS track and five or seven speakers and call it a day, but what he has done is downgrade the signal from 5.1 to a stereo source and then matrix from there. He could be going from the good ol days of PCM stereo which in some cases had a higher bitrate that 5.1 but those discs are far and few between.

He refuses to listen to reason, refuses to try out Bluray lossless (not that he could afford Bluray to begin with) I don't have an issue with what he is doing and if he likes it fine, my issue is when he tries to "teach" new members (which he tried to do far too often at Sound and Vision) and new members were getting so confused because he would tell them something so completely way off base and then when other members tried to correct him, he would get very argumentative and slanderous, meanwhile the new member would think we all were off our rockers and leave. That to me would irk me the most.

Even today if you read his posts over at AVS, he still does it today and it just infuriates me. I stopped posting over at AVS because he would complain to the mods that i was harrassing him (when I would just correct him again) and I would get banned and he would be allowed to post. he has been banned many times over there, but I can read his posts under new names and just kind of gave up over there. The man is clearly not running on all cylinders and can only hope he has a parole officer watching over him before he hurts somebody. And yes the cat has already suffered fractured rear legs (he claims from the cat jumping off the couch, but I sure find that hard to believe. ) :(
 
Last edited:
M

MatthewB.

Audioholic General
Yeah he purposely took down the pics on the thread I borrowed from, but that thread he still left a bunch of pics up, so visit this link to see what he hasnt taken down yet, you can still get an idea of the insanity.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=995892

Oh and Ashley, I know your reading this so. Pssssfffftttttttt :p
 
Y

yepimonfire

Audioholic Samurai
well i see what he was trying to do, if you look through his thread about the theater he worked in it appears he tried to emulate that, what he seems to be forgetting is, there are two left and right channels because the theater is so huge, in the theater, they were probably spaced 10 feet apart, in the room he was in, it was more like ten inches instantly causing the waveforms to collide and cancel out creating large gaps in certain areas of the room. as far as using multiple surround channels, i see nothing wrong with this because i have done it in a large room before to get good coverage for all seats, but i never matrixed them, they were just additional speakers hooked in parallel to the receiver. they were also spaced approximately 5-7 feet apart.
 
Y

yepimonfire

Audioholic Samurai
thanks for putting me back in the red whoever you are and leaving me a pointless message along with it.
 
M

MatthewB.

Audioholic General
Hmmmm somebody left you a red chicklet, well I'll give you two guesses, but your only gonna need one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top