Wayde what kind of regs are you talking about?
The worst kind of business protectionism.
Look at the mission statement of the CRTC - (Canada Radio Television and Telecommunications Commission) and compare it to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) in in the US. You'll see a flawed and I say
evil philosophy at work in the Canadian government.
CRTC:
"To ensure that Canadian communications contribute fairly and equitably to Canada's economic,
social and cultural prosperity through regulation, supervision and public dialogue."
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/ENG/BACKGRND/GUIDE.HTM
FCC:
"The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable."
http://www.fcc.gov/aboutus.html
It's truly scary when a government charges itself with the social and cultural prosperity of its people.
The CRTC's Canadian Content regulation dictates a minimum amount of Canadian artists on any radio station operating here.
But the really insidious part of the CRTC is where it protects "Canadian business", especially where some of that Canadian business is actually the government itself, like the CBC.
The CRTC and that protectionist philosophy is why wireless data costs more per-meg than any other country in the world. It's also why streaming video/music technologies don't work and won't make it to Canada for a very long time. Good luck ever seeing a streaming library of movies in Canada for a low monthly fee. Same for music.
My dad lives in the US and is an engineer for Comcast, he used to be an engineer for McLean Hunter in Canada. We moved down there back in the 80s.
He grew up in an era that was a wild frontier for technology in Canada, Canadian telecommunications was second to none and we produced world-class engineers that were needed all over the globe. This is changing - despite great schools like U of Waterloo.
The greed of the CRTC and the companies it protects like Bell and Rogers are ironically forcing Canada into the tech-backwaters. New industries are developing around the world that Canadian entrepreneurs are isolated from because of CRTC regulations.
RIM is one of Canada's great success stories. But the CRTC has ensured that cannot happen again. In fact many of the technologies developed in Waterloo are launched in the US before they're launched in Canada, some will probably never make it (to Canada). For instance.... you can't stream Internet radio in Canada over a wireless digital network. Any business based on wireless spectrum as an asset is too cost-prohibitive to operate in Canada, it's why Canada didn't get the iPhone until after a long battle between Apple and Rogers.
To tell the truth, Apple doesn't need Canada's business and is better off without it. Apple's 'real' business isn't to sell iPhones, but to sell content on iTunes. The idea of wireless sales direct to handset is neutered here in Canada.
I live and work in Waterloo - RIM practically owns this city and is its biggest employer. I am in marketing for a small tech-company in Waterloo that is a Blackberry Alliance partner, we develop technologies that make the Blackberry better.
We have the US to thank for RIM's success. The company would be nowhere without a US market to serve.
Jeez, I should just a feature article on this topic.