Starting Home Theater - ~5000 USD speaker budget for 5.1(2)... What to get?

T

theblackangus

Enthusiast
Hello all!
First let me thank you for any help or opinion you can provide to me on this subject as Im pretty new to the AV market and dont know much. =)

The room that will be used for the home theater is a non dedicated theater room. There will be a stage and screen but there is a pool table at the back 1/2 of the room. The room is an L shape. If you cut part of the L off to make a rectangular room the room would be 18x27. This also means to the back right of the seating there is no wall like there is on the back left.

The budget mentioned above is just for speakers. Room treatments will be done, but I will build them myself with a different budget.

The use case will be 75% movies 25% music. I am going to start with a 5.1 systems unless someone else recommends that I do 7.1 because of the room use.

The electronics Im looking at are:
Integra 40.1 or 80.1
Rotel rsp-1570 (Better sounding musically?)
Denon 4310ci or 4810ci

Possible Amps:
Sunfire TGA 7201
Rotel 1575
Emotiva XPA5 (Maybe add a +2 at that price just to drive the fronts.)

Electronics will be purchased first to use with my current CV AT-15's. (4 Ohm 400 watt). These will later be re-purposed to a secondary room for use.

Speakers Ive looked at/listened to:
B&W
CM9 - Liked
804s - Really Liked mid range to high range sounded fuller than CM9.

Paradigm
Studio 10 - Liked Best of the Paradigms. (Sounded most natural)
Studio 20 - Sounded big and precise. Didnt sound bad but I didnt like as much as the B&W
Sig series 8 - Sounded big and precise. Didnt sound bad but I didnt like as much as the B&W - Very good all around base. (Again out of my price range)

Magnapan
1.6 - Didn't sound special. Didn't sound too good really. I think it was their placement which was against a wall.
3.6 - Fantastic with a good source. (Straight out of my price range for a 5.1 setup)

Focal
3K pair - Didn't sound bad, but didn't sound as good as any of the above.

What other brands/models should I be looking at?
Since this is mostly home theater use should I be looking at different speakers all together, and just get a 2 channel setup for music later?
From reading it looks like I should have 2 subs for best coverage/sound quality? (People agree?)
Any other advice would be great.

Thanks!
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
I say keep looking at more speakers.

Try some Def Techs too. You never know. It doesn't hurt. At least you can say that you've heard them, right?:D
 
S

shadyJ

Speaker of the House
Staff member
Personally, on that budget I would look at a setup built around some Klipsch RF-63 speakers. However, I wouldn't get a Klipsch sub, for that I would turn to a internet direct dealer for a sub with nice finishes, something from Hsu Research or SVS. Also, I don't think I would go with the recommended Klipsch surrounds for that setup either, I would with something smaller like some Hsu bookshelf speakers. I think dipole speakers are kind of a messy way of emitting sound. However, I think I would want to get the RC-64 center.

Two subs would be a must in a room that big, at least for myself. If you can stand the big black boxy look of Epik subwoofers, that would be worth looking into. A couple Phoenix's or Dragons would rock that room. A couple of SVS PC-12 Plus subs in the corners would do very nicely, also. If you want a better finish, look at a Hsu Research ULS-15 dual drive. Or perhaps a couple VTF3 mk3 subs, if the dual drive is too expensive for you. Very nice finishes on the Hsu subs. If nice finishes don't matter to you, look at Elemental Designs subwoofers. They have a range of subwoofers which sound very good and have enormous amounts of output. Rythmik subwoofers would also be well worth looking into.

But, like I said, a setup like that is what I would do. It certainly wouldn't fit everyone, but it would sound great for music, and the dynamic response and low frequency capability would make it a beast for home theater. Whether or not Klipsch speakers are too your liking, I would advise you not to go cheap on the subs, if you do you will be lacking a important part of home theater. I would reserve 2 or 2.5K for subs alone in a room like yours.
 
J

jostenmeat

Audioholic Spartan
Hello all!
Hello! How much are the 3.6 Maggies, if you don't mind me asking? I also enjoyed the 804s, but the problem there is that just a pair already eats up the majority of your budget. OTOH, you'd get what you want, and if any certain component should take the lion's share of the budget, I say speakers would be it. For HT primarily, I vote for monopoles over planars for sure, and I love planars.

What is this "stage" going to look like? What would pretty awesome is 3x 804s for the fronts, behind an acoustically transparent screen. Basspig here made his own after making the material, and if you PM him, he might be of assistance.

I wish my good friend that I'm helping right now with his slowly evolving HT had 5k to blow on audio. :cool:
 
J

just listening

Audioholic
First off, I love Maggies, but you need SERIOUS horsepower to make them truly sing. I firmly believe anything less than $3-5K amp just isn't enough. In addition, if you go that way it's my understanding that a crossover upgrade is available by a third party that really kicks them up a notch.

My suggestion would be to go with the brand new version of the ACI Sapphire XL's ($1.8K)for the front, the Emerald XL's for the rear and center ($1.2K), and the Force XL subwoofer ($1K) powered by Rotel gear you mentioned. You'll have a fine sounding room with both impact and clarity.
 
AVRat

AVRat

Audioholic Ninja
How long is the right wall? How far back will the seating be? What is the ceiling height? It would seem that a 5.2 setup would be sufficient. Dual Epik Sentinels would work very well in that space.

For speakers you might look at the PSB Imagine T/Center and the Ascend Acoustics HTM-400s for surrounds.
 
agarwalro

agarwalro

Audioholic Ninja
Having listened to the Salk SongTower QWT, I highly recommend them. They sound fantastic for $1700 (black satin) or $1800 (standard wood veneer). The series also has center, surrounds and sub to complete/ complement the mains.

Edit: I want to clarify; when I said they sound fantastic for the money, I wanted to come off a little stronger. FWIW, I have not heard such good sounding speakers for that less a cost, period.
 
Last edited:
B

Boerd

Full Audioholic
In this price range take a look at NHT, Paradigm, B&W and Canton to name only a few...
 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
Hi there! Welcome :)

It is wonderful that you will be acoustically treating your room and driving your speakers with some excellent gear. When I first saw your thread title (before seeing the body of the text) I was thinking this might be another case where the budget would be better used if divided between speakers and acoustic treatments. But lo and behold, you're already well ahead of the game! :D

Let's get some ground work out of the way first, shall we?

Your room is large. If we take just the rectangular portion (ignoring the 'L' shape for a moment) you already have close to 4000 cubic feet (assuming an 8 foot ceiling). Regardless, that part of the room is already large and when we include the 'L' area, it becomes a very large acoustic space.

With that in mind, the first consideration is getting superb bass output. Excellent bass is what takes a home theater from "meh" to "WOW", so this should be a primary focus. I would definitely recommend at least 2 subwoofers.

Next, from your description, you are going to have quite a bit of distance behind your seats to the back wall. From what you described, there will be something around 13 feet behind your seats where the pool table will go, yes? With that sort of layout, I would recommend a 7 speaker setup. A lot of people have smaller rooms and only have a few feet (if that) behind their seats. In those types of rooms, having the additional surround back speakers does not really help and can, in fact, make the surround effect worse, IMO. But in your room, you will have lots of distance behind your seat and the "wrap around" effect could be lost if you only make use of two surround speakers to either side.

I subscribe strongly to the THX recommended speaker placement. So please, check out their diagram for 7 speaker placement Also make note of their specific recommended placement for the surround speakers. I heartily agree with this recommended placement, although I am sure Jostenmeat will voice his opinion that the surround speakers should be at ear level (he and I have debated this in the past and do not fully agree although we can both see the arguments for both recommendations :p )

Since we know that you already enjoy the sound of the B&W 804S speakers and did not enjoy the Paradigm or Focal auditions quite as much, I think I have a fairly good understanding - at least a ballpark idea - of what sort of sound you like. Given that I am strongly recommending dual subs and 7 speakers, the price of the B&W setup would likely go over your budget. For that reason, I'm going to make a strong recommendation for RBH speakers here: their Signature Series in particular, due to your price point.

The speaker package that I would recommend would be as follows:

3 RBH 661-SE across the front.

1 pair RBH 66-SE surround speakers

1 pair RBH 41-SE speakers for the surround back speakers.

If you wonder why I am not recommending tower front speakers, I have a number of reasons:

1) I am simply a fan of using identical speakers for all 3 front speakers whenever possible.

2) Given your description that about half of the room's length will be dedicated to a pool table behind your seating area, your actual distance from ears to speakers is around maybe 12-13 feet. The 661-SE speakers will be able to provide plenty of output for that distance.

3) I strongly subscribe to the THX notion of allowing the subwoofer to handle the bass. This means that your main speakers need only be able to reach down low enough to properly cross-over with the subwoofer. I do not subscribe to running full-range front speakers. I believe the bass can be better handled by subwoofers. So I see no need to "waste" money on extended bass performance from a tower speaker when the subwoofers will be handling the bass anyway ;)

4) Price.

I am not sure what you local RBH dealer will offer for pricing on this package, but I would expect it to be around $3000-$3800. Please try to locate an RBH dealer within your area and find out what sort of pricing you will get on this package.

Regardless, you should have a healthy amount left in your $5000 budget for two subwoofers. But depending on your RBH speaker pricing, it's not a huge budget for two subwoofers.

If your RBH pricing is closer to the high end of my expected price range, then the choice is pretty easy, IMO: 2 SVSound PB12-NSD or the cylinder version: PC12-NSD if you prefer the smaller footprint, but much taller configuration.

I recommend the PB12-NSD all the time because it is simply the best performer, to my knowledge, in its price range. Most impressive is its relatively low distortion output at very loud output levels while it maintains linear response right down to about 22 Hz. Extremely few subwoofers can maintain linear response that low when asked to play very loud and even fewer can do so while keeping the distortion under control. If you need to fit your 2 subwoofers into a lower budget, the PB12-NSD/PC12-NSD is easily the way to go, IMO.

If your RBH speaker pricing is closer to the low end of my expected range, then you can look at some pricier subwoofers. SVSound remains an excellent candidate if you move up to their "Plus" models. Epik Subwoofers is also a strong contender. Their "Phoenix" subwoofers would be a suberb choice if they fit your budget.

Regardless of your subwoofer choice, it is vital (and I bring this up with every subwoofer recommendation that I make) that you decouple the subwoofer. The best device that I know of for decoupling is the Auralex GRAMMA. Depending on your choice of subwoofer, you might need two GRAMMA risers for each subwoofer. Each GRAMMA costs $50, so factor that into your budget as well ;)

Best of luck!
 
T

theblackangus

Enthusiast
Im still looking at all the recomendations, but I wanted to respond to some peoples questions, and add a few of my own. Thanks for all the responses, except that badman porchetech with is corrupting ideas. :D

I say keep looking at more speakers.

Try some Def Techs too. You never know. It doesn't hurt. At least you can say that you've heard them, right?
No dealer any where remotely near me. (2-3 hour drive). So I could but it would be a pain. =)
But I have read some good things about them.
Maybe tho.

Hello! How much are the 3.6 Maggies, if you don't mind me asking?
5200 a pair. Listened to some guitar on them on a 25w tube amp. Really sounded so good.

What is this "stage" going to look like? What would pretty awesome is 3x 804s for the fronts, behind an acoustically transparent screen.
I was actually thinking about that. Im going to build something on a small 4.5" high stage that spans most of the front of the room.

I could do the screen but I love the way some speakers (804s) look so I would tend to want to display them and not hide them. If I went the bookcase/JBL route I could conceal them all.

I wonder if I can talk the dealer into a really good deal on 3 804s =) (Would have to be really really good, at least a good deal on two 804s and a htm3 center.:))

How long is the right wall? How far back will the seating be? What is the ceiling height? It would seem that a 5.2 setup would be sufficient. Dual Epik Sentinels would work very well in that space.
The seating position will be about 14 feet from the Screen wall. (Maybe 11-12 from edge of screen.Trying to go curved Cinemascope, home built)
The right wall is 14 feet from screen wall until it 90's off. The left wall is the full 27'. So there will be about 13' of area behind the seating.

i'd go for some mint/used paradigms
Waaaaaa but I want ..... er something.
Seriously tho they didnt sound bad, I just didnt like them as much for the way they sounded. Could be the setup wasnt doing them justice.

Hi there! Welcome :)

It is wonderful that you will be acoustically treating your room and driving your speakers with some excellent gear. When I first saw your thread title (before seeing the body of the text) I was thinking this might be another case where the budget would be better used if divided between speakers and acoustic treatments. But lo and behold, you're already well ahead of the game! :D
I have read enough to know I have to treat the room. Im trying to save money where I can so hopefully I am creative enough to build my own that dont look too bad =) I still need to do a lot of research here and in the planning of the room.
Im somewhat confused on what to do with the L shaped room.

Let's get some ground work out of the way first, shall we?

Your room is large. If we take just the rectangular portion (ignoring the 'L' shape for a moment) you already have close to 4000 cubic feet (assuming an 8 foot ceiling). Regardless, that part of the room is already large and when we include the 'L' area, it becomes a very large acoustic space.
The first 14 feet is 8' ceiling the second 13' (and L) is 9' ceilings.
So its a bit larger than estimated.

With that in mind, the first consideration is getting superb bass output. Excellent bass is what takes a home theater from "meh" to "WOW", so this should be a primary focus. I would definitely recommend at least 2 subwoofers.

Next, from your description, you are going to have quite a bit of distance behind your seats to the back wall. From what you described, there will be something around 13 feet behind your seats where the pool table will go, yes? With that sort of layout, I would recommend a 7 speaker setup. A lot of people have smaller rooms and only have a few feet (if that) behind their seats. In those types of rooms, having the additional surround back speakers does not really help and can, in fact, make the surround effect worse, IMO. But in your room, you will have lots of distance behind your seat and the "wrap around" effect could be lost if you only make use of two surround speakers to either side.

I subscribe strongly to the THX recommended speaker placement.

I strongly subscribe to the THX notion of allowing the subwoofer to handle the bass. This means that your main speakers need only be able to reach down low enough to properly cross-over with the subwoofer. I do not subscribe to running full-range front speakers. I believe the bass can be better handled by subwoofers. So I see no need to "waste" money on extended bass performance from a tower speaker when the subwoofers will be handling the bass anyway ;)
So two subs seems to be the consensus from this thread =) Two subs it shall be! And apparently SVS or Epik subs too.

I was curious about the 7 speaker setup, for the reason you so eloquently stated. But alas that limits my budget for the other speakers. Would it be bad of me to say I would like to start with 5.1 (wire for 11.4) and build up from there as additional budget permits .... later in life? :eek:

Also you brought to my mind the question I had forgotten to ask.
If I didnt get full range speakers for my fronts/Center would going with something like JBL 4722 (or something comparable) for all speakers +2 subs. I imagine that is the trade off of good home theater sound but not so great of a musical sound. Does one get considerable better bang for the buck if they can stomach ugly and not quite as musical?
I guess these sell right for around 1.1K ,give or take, new. So close to 5k for 5 =). And apparently Theaters use them so they cant be too bad!

Is this an acceptable strategy and how much would the sound suffer for 2 channel music?

Thanks!
 
J

jostenmeat

Audioholic Spartan
I was actually thinking about that. Im going to build something on a small 4.5" high stage that spans most of the front of the room.

I could do the screen but I love the way some speakers (804s) look so I would tend to want to display them and not hide them. If I went the bookcase/JBL route I could conceal them all.

I wonder if I can talk the dealer into a really good deal on 3 804s =) (Would have to be really really good, at least a good deal on two 804s and a htm3 center.:))
You can always have the stereo speakers on display, and only have the center hidden behind the screen.

The seating position will be about 14 feet from the Screen wall. (Maybe 11-12 from edge of screen.Trying to go curved Cinemascope, home built)
The right wall is 14 feet from screen wall until it 90's off. The left wall is the full 27'. So there will be about 13' of area behind the seating.
I think I would prefer an auto masking system to anamorphic setup. Zero possibility of distortion, probably will cost less, and with luck, you can choose any darn size for any AR you might want. (For instance, a smaller 16:9 for an old movie, vs a supersized 16:9 on an excellent animation). However, I know little of what can be done, and for how much.

Does one get considerable better bang for the buck if they can stomach ugly and not quite as musical?
I guess these sell right for around 1.1K ,give or take, new. So close to 5k for 5 =). And apparently Theaters use them so they cant be too bad!
There is a member here, rmk, who went from very nice "audiophile" Revels to more "commercial" JTRs, and he's happy as a bug.



And for JBL, basspig would be the first guy I'd ask here. :D

 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
The most basic goal in audio reproduction is to have a linear frequency response at the listening position. Whether you are in a small studio with the speakers a mere 2-3 feet from you, in your home theater with the speakers 12 feet away or in a full-sized theater with the speakers 45 feet away, what you are after is a linear frequency response.

Bass interacts with the room more than the higher frequencies do. The long wavelengths and the fact that the resonant frequencies of structural materials generally fall into the bass range means that, when it comes to bass, you generally hear "the room" just as much as the subwoofers.

But high frequencies are the most directional, are more easily absorbed or scattered and our perception of high frequencies is very much affected by distance.

My point in all of this is that different speaker designs are appropriate for different purposes. And the greatest differences are in the bass and in the high frequencies.

Studio monitors that are meant to be heard from just 2-3 feet away output far quieter high frequencies. If you were to sit 12 feet away from Studio Monitors, unless you boost the high frequencies output somewhat, they would likely sound a bit "muffled" in the high end. Conversely, speakers that are meant for a full-sized theater output louder high frequencies. With the seating distance being so much farther in a full-sized theater, the high frequencies have to be "boosted" in order to compensate.

So, in a nut shell, this is why we generally do not use Studio Monitors or full-sized movie theater speakers at home. Now, that said, I am a great fan of professional speakers. You will often glean superb detail for the price because virtually none of the cost is going towards aesthetics. In that way, if you are willing to "suffer" with ugly, utilitarian speakers, you can get better performance for your money with professional speakers. But you have to be careful to purchase speakers that are intended for your listening distance.

If you preferred the sound of the B&W 804S over the Paradigm Studio or Focal speakers, I would caution that you are not likely to enjoy the JBL professional speakers. In much the same vein, I would not anticipate you liking Klipsch or even Axiom speakers based upon what you have described.

Since you already know you are fond of the B&W speakers, that would certainly be an excellent choice if you can get them for a price that you are willing to pay. I can certainly endorse the idea of getting fewer speakers now and adding the surround and surround back speakers later. I was merely suggesting a 7 speaker setup because I do believe it will ultimately be beneficial in your room. If you decide to simply expand your speaker setup at a later date, I've zero problem with that :)

I really do think that you might enjoy the RBH speakers though, so I hope that you will keep them in consideration ;)
 
F

fredk

Audioholic General
Studio monitors that are meant to be heard from just 2-3 feet away output far quieter high frequencies. If you were to sit 12 feet away from Studio Monitors, unless you boost the high frequencies output somewhat, they would likely sound a bit "muffled" in the high end. Conversely, speakers that are meant for a full-sized theater output louder high frequencies. With the seating distance being so much farther in a full-sized theater, the high frequencies have to be "boosted" in order to compensate.
I don't believe that is correct. Sound falls off with distance at the same rate throughout most of the spectrum. At somewhere around 300Hz (varies for each room) sound changes from behaving like a ray to behaving like a wave (modal) and you start to see pronounced peaks and nulls. At the lowest frequencies (below 50Hz??) there is some room gain.

The long and short of it is that there are a number of studio monitors that sound quite good in a home setting, like say, the B&W 800D. :D Oh, the Behringer BD3030p will do in a pinch. ;)
 
no. 5

no. 5

Audioholic Field Marshall
Sound falls off with distance at the same rate throughout most of the spectrum.
I'm being a bit pedantic here, but air itself does indeed rob energy from a sound wave with frequency; above around 2kHz as distance from a sound source increases, higher frequencies are increasingly attenuated compared to what 6dB/dd would predict. However, at the distances involved with a typical home theater, I doubt that the effect will be anywhere near as noticeable as a large venue with speakers ten or more times the distance away.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top