I never said that. My intention was to encourage you to listen to what's been offered (in case you were dissatisfied and/or were not sure if the information given was good). For, IMO, you are most likely not going to find better answers here. Sure, might as well ask, but my answer, again, was simply giving a +1 to what's been advised.
That is very interesting, thank you very much for that insight. I'd ask the author of that article directly, and he's a regular at the Acoustic theory subforum at AVS. Or just email directly, via Real Traps. If you look at his own site for comparative product data, yes there is reduced effectiveness below 80hz, but it still absorbs.
Now these are just rectangular panels, but if you do the super chunk traps as Kal Rubinson advised you, you will have much better effectiveness at absorbing the low frequencies. (Think "thickness" or "mass" for absorbing bass). On one hand, front corners are a bang for buck location in terms of bass trapping, but I'd like to repeat it's virtually impossible to go overkill with trapping. So if you can only do two corners, the front two are it, but I think you are going to be able to do more, so if you see a corner, trap it.
OTOH, the deadened front wall is popular with HT enthusiasts, but it's NOT the priority bang for buck spot, for it's not a first reflection point (like with sidewalls/ceiling/backwall outside of using dipole/omnipoles), but if you can go for it. Ethan Winer will tell you the exact same thing.
Are you still thinking ballpark of 150" screen? I'm not sure it's going to be bright enough with these PJs, unless you use a retroreflective screen. I'm sure you've been told that already, and I haven't checked in on those subforums too recently. Good luck!