OK, a beginner question. Through questions here I've concluded that I should be able to build a pair of bookshelf speakers that will perform admirably for a 2.1 channel home theater system and do it for $300 or less.
So my question is - why would I pay $1000 for a speaker set? What is the improvement?
This may seem like a dumb question, but if the bookshelf speakers can fill the room with good sound, what am I getting for the additional $900? (or $2k, or whatever...) Is it that the $1k speakers do something the $200 can't do, such as adequately fill a room with sound?
Or is it perceived or real quality difference in accomplishing the same task?
To use cars as an example, are the bookshelf speakers like a sedan and $1k towers like a pickup? (That is, while there will always be quality differences, they fundamentally acomplish different things?)
Or is it more like Kia sedan v. Mercedes sedan? As an example, an base package, entry-level Kia car, a Toyata Camary, and a top line Mercedes do roughly the same exact thing. It's only a quality difference.
Furthermore, I'd argue that the quality difference drops off pretty quickly at a certain point. So the difference between a bottom line Kia and a well appointed Camary is roughly $20k in price. However the improvement in driver/rider experince is pretty substantial.
On the other hand, I'd argue that for your average driver the additional 100k for a good Mercedes nets you far less real world improvement in drive/ride experience over the Camary. Diminishing marginal improvement for $ spent.
Is this a fair comparison with speakers?
And if so, is my $200 pair of Microbe DIY speakers more like the Kia? Or is the Kia the speakers in my TV set, the Microbe the Camary, and the $2000k speakers the Mercedes?
Your insight is appreciated!