tbergman

tbergman

Full Audioholic
I found some used Polk RTi70's, wondering if they are any good. If anyone has heard anything about these towers let me know. Looking to replace the included main fronts in my onkyo 5100 system. The guy also has a polk CSi30 center channel that I would probably pick up as well.
 
M

Movieguy

Audiophyte
Say no to Polk Audio

I have the RTi A9, which sound much better than the Lsi 15/25 btw, but they are not as crisp or clearer than the Focal 826V. I did listened to them at Tweeter and bought A9 instead because they are $1000 cheaper than the 826V and they sound very close to 826V. The A9 has more bass than 826V but lack of clarity on the mid range. If I have to choose another pair of speakers I would not choose something like Revel F12, $1200/pair or the paradigm signature S4 which are pricey, $2,600. In my opinion Polk audio make "ok" speakers. They are nothing to brag about.
 
dorokusai

dorokusai

Full Audioholic
I have the RTi A9, which sound much better than the Lsi 15/25 btw, but they are not as crisp or clearer than the Focal 826V. I did listened to them at Tweeter and bought A9 instead because they are $1000 cheaper than the 826V and they sound very close to 826V. The A9 has more bass than 826V but lack of clarity on the mid range. If I have to choose another pair of speakers I would not choose something like Revel F12, $1200/pair or the paradigm signature S4 which are pricey, $2,600. In my opinion Polk audio make "ok" speakers. They are nothing to brag about.
Please send me your address for the next Polk X-Mas card.
 
dorokusai

dorokusai

Full Audioholic
I found some used Polk RTi70's, wondering if they are any good. If anyone has heard anything about these towers let me know. Looking to replace the included main fronts in my onkyo 5100 system. The guy also has a polk CSi30 center channel that I would probably pick up as well.
Naturally I've heard them, it's a solid floorstander and I like the simplicity of it. The midrange and bass response isn't overdone. As far as vintage Polk's go, from a Polk forum perspective, it was preferred over the larger models, like the RTi100 & RTi150.

In regards to the center channel, it's adequate for mid-size rooms but I found the larger CSi40 better for that overall. Hey, my ears aren't your ears. It's not a bad CC, certainly a match for that speaker, just a little soft in overall impact.

Mark
 
Shintsu

Shintsu

Banned
I have the RTi A9, which sound much better than the Lsi 15/25 btw, but they are not as crisp or clearer than the Focal 826V. I did listened to them at Tweeter and bought A9 instead because they are $1000 cheaper than the 826V and they sound very close to 826V. The A9 has more bass than 826V but lack of clarity on the mid range. If I have to choose another pair of speakers I would not choose something like Revel F12, $1200/pair or the paradigm signature S4 which are pricey, $2,600. In my opinion Polk audio make "ok" speakers. They are nothing to brag about.
Hmm, funny you should say that. I compared my Polk R50s to Wharfdale Sapphire 83s or 87s as well as Polk Monitor 10bs and a set of NHT 1.3s and was unable to tell any such drastic difference between mine and them. The NHTs were on the bright side, the Wharfdales had a bit softer sound to them, the Monitor 10bs I am having trouble remembering at the moment but the only thing - they were a bit more boomy and bassy, but they should be. I was given a reasonable offer of $150 for any of the pairs of speakers above but I think I'll pass given none of them sound noticably better than mine for imaging. The Monitor 10bs were the best of the speakers but they're on the large size for the room I'm using them in.

My non-professional opinion would be to go for it, the RTi series always looked nice but I was unable to listen to a pair that I wanted to buy. I was so close to buying a pair of RTi8s but the damn guy was too busy golfing to sell them to me :mad:.
 
tbergman

tbergman

Full Audioholic
Well I haven't heard from the guy selling them yet so I might not get a chance to listen to them after all.
 
dorokusai

dorokusai

Full Audioholic
Oh well, there's other speakers....you'll lasso them soon enough.

Mark
 
C

cl35m

Banned
I have the RTi A9, which sound much better than the Lsi 15/25 btw, but they are not as crisp or clearer than the Focal 826V. I did listened to them at Tweeter and bought A9 instead because they are $1000 cheaper than the 826V and they sound very close to 826V. The A9 has more bass than 826V but lack of clarity on the mid range. If I have to choose another pair of speakers I would not choose something like Revel F12, $1200/pair or the paradigm signature S4 which are pricey, $2,600. In my opinion Polk audio make "ok" speakers. They are nothing to brag about.
I agree. Wait for some used vintage polk SDA's. They are 10 times better than anything they make now or since 1990. The only disadvantage of the SDA's is that they require a common ground amp since the left and right speakers are connected to each other with an unbilical cord.
 
Shintsu

Shintsu

Banned
I agree. Wait for some used vintage polk SDA's. They are 10 times better than anything they make now or since 1990. The only disadvantage of the SDA's is that they require a common ground amp since the left and right speakers are connected to each other with an unbilical cord.
...Why does everyone always recommend older speakers as opposed to newer ones? You know, ones that are less apt to have torn rubber surrounds as well as look much better and from my experience sound just fine. A great deal of the time I see older speakers they're always in poor shape as opposed to even cheap newer speakers.

I've listened to several newer pairs of Polk speakers and one pair of vintage Polks in good shape and they don't sound any different. Given the newer ones look better and are more reliable, it's pretty much a no-brainer which to go with. Polk audio's newer equipment is just as good as their older stuff if not better (haven't heard enough vintage to say).
 
C

cl35m

Banned
...Why does everyone always recommend older speakers as opposed to newer ones? You know, ones that are less apt to have torn rubber surrounds as well as look much better and from my experience sound just fine. A great deal of the time I see older speakers they're always in poor shape as opposed to even cheap newer speakers.

I've listened to several newer pairs of Polk speakers and one pair of vintage Polks in good shape and they don't sound any different. Given the newer ones look better and are more reliable, it's pretty much a no-brainer which to go with. Polk audio's newer equipment is just as good as their older stuff if not better (haven't heard enough vintage to say).
If you're happy with what you have then that is the most important thing. If someone is looking for the best of the best then the vintage polk SDA's are without a doubt the best they will ever make.

SDA 2B, SDA 1B, or SDA 1C are very popular models because they are smaller than the huge SDA SRS or SDA 2.3

http://www.polksda.com/index.shtml
 
Shintsu

Shintsu

Banned
All I'm saying, that's a lot of extra footwork and trouble he'd go to when there is good stuff he can have for less trouble and money. I'm sure they do sound nice after looking it up, but I'm wagering the RTi 70 sounds good as well. Still, it's somewhat hard to buy into as well being you have SDAs already - makes it seem like you're telling him they're bad and he should get what you have only. I'm well aware better speakers than mine are out there, but so far I haven't heard them (Probably for the best, I would most likely be unable to afford the speakers I like better than mine).
 
C

cl35m

Banned
Last year I paid $275 for a pair of used SDA 1B's that I found on CL that are in very good condition. Yes 2 of the tweeters weren't working but I had 2 of the same OEM tweeters on hand. Easy fix. I enjoy the extra effort and legwork.

Most that are in this hobby want the best. Sometimes that means less money and sometimes it means more money and extra effort.

I can't go to BB and buy vintage tubes either but I do what I have to to find them.

I'm not saying everyone should do this but for me it is well worth it.
 
Shintsu

Shintsu

Banned
Ouch, me personally I could never buy a speaker with part of it not working. It's too hard to find OEM replacements, what are the chances any other person would find those tweeters the way you did? I paid $100 for these Polk R50s, the same price I paid for a pair of KLH T-5 main speakers. These are easily much clearer and crisp than the KLH speakers were.

I agree, BB is a horrible place to buy audio equipment unless it's a Magnolia. The plain jane BBs carry nothing but shrill Klipsch speakers, JBLs, and I think they had Yamaha and Sony didn't they? Nothing worth writing home about in any case.

No offense but I don't see what the obsession with tubes is. From what I've been told they color the image and that reduces the accuracy of the sound. I'd rather accurate sound than pleasant - if the source is pleasant it will sound as such. I want the best as well, but I still don't believe it's necessary to hunt down an old set of speakers in mediocre condition and pay a premium for them. It's sort of like the old car folks, good for some but I can't see the sense in it. Money is much better spent on newer cars that are still great and far more easy to locate and maintain than the older alternative. But some people will pay the extra price even given the extra effort and work to get the same result a newer car would provide at a lower price with no real effort.

Some find that enjoyable, some don't but both groups could be said to be auto enthusiasts. In the same, I would say there are audio enthusiasts who think with either mindset as well. I fall with the latter, but there's nothing wrong with liking the old stuff. In the same that old car owners respect some newer car owners though, don't diss the newer stuff just because you personally don't like it. Plenty of people do even if you don't. No need to bash the entire Polk lineup just because it isn't to your liking since it clearly is for many people. In the same regard, plenty of people like the older stuff such as yourself.

But we're taking this thread a bit OT, tbergman if you can get ahold of the guy and listen to them and you like them go for it. If I might ask, what is the selling price of his RTi 70s? Like I said, I paid only $100 for my R50s in mint condition with no signs of wear or tear and everything flawless on them including the original boxes (Which I stupidly threw away since they were getting in my way - oh well...) and manuals. The big benefit of the RTi series is the fact they're real wood. Recently though, it appears Polk changed their lineup as I am not seing the R50 for sale there anymore nor the normal RTi models I had previously seen.
 
C

cl35m

Banned
I'm not stuck on buying vintage but I definitely will if it sounds better to me. The internet has pretty much solved the problem of finding parts for nearly anything vintage these days.

One of the most popular audio forums on the net is full of individuals who love to restore vintage tv's, vintage tube stereos of any kind, vintage solid state stereos of any kind, etc.

Once I heard tubes, I knew it was the kind of sound for me. Tubes aren't for everyone tho.
 
Shintsu

Shintsu

Banned
lol, not a fan of the old stuff. Build quality is good, but I don't care what anyone says - finding parts is NOT easy. The internet is your best bet and that's still a gamble. I look up audio equipment online regularly and I can't find any info on them at all - god forbid I was looking for parts for the thing! I at least get restoring vintage audio but why TV's lol? Especially given the DTV change coming here in a month. I'd wager these same people have a "retro" room - a need idea for certain but not practical for most people.
 
S

shemtaiah

Audiophyte
I have a pair of Polk LS90s, a Polk CS350, and a pair of LS/Fx bipole/dipole surrounds. The latter arrived in pieces -- dried cement on the tweeters, and one woofer. It has taken me almost a year to find OEM replacement speakers, and they were rather expensive. I will connect the LS/Fx units as soon as I repair the pegs on the grills (very fragile on the older speakers -- often broken off).
My point is this, vintage quality speakers (I also have some old relatively high-end Pioneers CSJ-825) may require a bit maintenance from time to time. So if you just want to listen and not have to tinker, the newer stuff is what you want.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top