So you believe the main difference comes from the electronics and not some kind of "deeper cell" (new lingo to me in this thread) or some kind of filter that makes the light from the panel be more restricted to produce a more controlled black level. I'm just trying to understand. If you have more information about what you just said I would be very grateful to learn more in depth.QUOTE]
Pioneer Kuros have a deeper cell, which is a pixel, therby holding more gas. They have achieved near zero idle when there is no signal, which means the screen is black. In a dark room, the screen on others still emits light because their is more electricity going to the pixels at idle. This helps them acheive more brightness because they are already somewhat "lit". Pioneer is able to have near zero idle while overcoming the need to have that minimal charge to acheive the brightness. Blacker blacks and brighter whites give more contrast.
The new Kuros also have eliminated the outter glass covering which also diminished the picture. The black level on the 9th gen (current models) is five times blacker than last year's when this was posted.
http://www.audioholics.com/news/industry-news/pioneer-debuts-project-kuro.html
I have yet to see anything that gives a better picture overall than the Kuros. The Pannasonics have a very nice picture at a much less price giving them a much better bang for the buck. If you want the best picture, however, the Elite Kuro is in my opinion, the best I have seen...if you can afford it.
Hope this helps.