I've read a good deal on all the back and forth of Monster Cables efforts to protect their trademarks. Just recently I watched the Noel Lee video which got me fired up and is the primary reason for my response here.
Here are what I consider to be the main points to consider in this ongoing soap opera.
Firstly, the root of the problem; they should have never been granted the word monster alone to be trademarked. Its just a silly idea to allow common English words to be trademarked by themselves regardless.. While I don't understand all the legal steps to maintain it, I would think there should be a way for the trademark offices to not allow for its renewal at some point. Maybe someone can speak intelligently on that.
Secondly, Noel Lee has argued that no company would call itself monster back in 1978 when he started the company. Now, he claims, it seems everyone uses it. He attributes that to the success of his company. I disagree, I attribute a gain in popularity to the word monster used in common vernacular and consequently with more businesses as a result of Sesame Street's Elmo, Cookie, Grover, Zoey, and Telly monster's, and the general dynamic of children and monsters. It's a common theme, just as dinosaurs have become popular in that same time span. Consider the target for both Monster Mini Golf and MonsterRepublic, children right?
Thirdly, Mr. Lee makes the appeal to his customers that he is only trying to "protect the brand from being diluted", but keep in mind this same company threatened to sue Blue Jeans cable for supposedly infringing on design patents. So he wasn't attempting to protect his name there, and I think we all know that his companies efforts to wage that war was ended quickly when there was no basis to any of their numerous complaints. So it isn't as if his company has never acted frivolously. Mr. Lee's pleas that they are not looking to hurt small companies because they are one themselves, and that it is their "obligation" to protect their namesake is just a bunch of hooey. Companies are constantly making decisions on how best to be run, and frankly they have made bad ones. The numerous lawsuits have resulted in the need for them to post such responses and address this bullying situation publicly because there is concern about lost business, and with good reason.
Finally, somewhere in the video Mr. Lee talks about offering his product at "fair prices", but knowing what the margin %'s are for his cable products at big box stores, I'd hardly call them fair. So it's not enough that he bullies companies, lets not forget he helped set a trend for overpriced cables.
The bottom line seems to be the personality of Mr.Lee. His efforts have made him wealthy and he had done well for himself, but it appears to be at the expense of greed. I think this is clouding his judgment and It's a shame so many others have been made to suffer.