JENSEN Explosive Home Cinema

snappy_snoopy

snappy_snoopy

Audioholic
Hi, just recently bought a pair of JENSEN QX-15 bookshelf speakers for my main speakers and a QX-85 Sub woofer to go with them, my current stereo setup is absolutely stunning these speakers are clean and clear and have some very very good looks. Has any one else used a pair of JENSEN speakers before ????

I know that in the US jensen speakers have been used mainly for car audio and guitar amps but in Australia there is a audio company called BDImports that has got the license to build massive speakers using JENSEN speaker designs.

Bought mine in New Zealand from a local hi fi store they sound amazing much better than my dads sub and sat speakers from BOSE. He did extensive testing with me last weekend after hours of different music cds and movies he came to the same conclusion and wants to upgrade to 5.1 using JENSEN speakers now aswell.

They are great speakers as long as you pair them up with a sub, even the top of the range floor standing speakers lack the punching bass you want for those exciting times during a movie.

Just wandering if anyone else has had experience with a pair of JENSEN speakers and loved them as much as i do mine. :D:D
 
Adam

Adam

Audioholic Jedi
I don't experience with any, but I wanted to thank you for your review.
 
snappy_snoopy

snappy_snoopy

Audioholic
they cost about the same as the entry level speakers for KEF or POLK (bookshelf type) but the sub was a bit more expensive, on the website www.DBImports.com.au (from memory thats what i think it was) they said they would be broadening their distribution centres to Europe, UK and US so maybe you will see some in the comming years.

Personally i am very happy with them crisp and clean sounding and strong deep bass (more than what my ears can handle) also they have magnetic grills which is very cool so if you dont like the grill plugs and enjoy the raw speaker look such as myself then these are excellent.

My description of the speakers is probably a tad biased as i have not listened to the expensive range from KEF or POLK but they stack up pretty good :D:D
 
snappy_snoopy

snappy_snoopy

Audioholic
oh where i said strong deep bass that was slightly incorrect, by that i meant the matching sub not the actual book shelf speakers.

The bookshelf ones since they are small and have limited air volume and drivers are small, the bass does not travel very far and not alot should be expected anyway.

But they are very clear :D:D regardless for the mid to high range frequencies even though they say the freq response is 60Hz up they do not do the bass justice. No freq response gragh is given unfortunately :D:D
 
jcPanny

jcPanny

Audioholic Ninja
New speakers

Enjoy the new speakers.
I am not suprised that they sound better than bose, most speakers do. The Bose sats cut off around 200 Hz and the "Bass Module" only goes down to 60-70 Hz.
 
snappy_snoopy

snappy_snoopy

Audioholic
Enjoy the new speakers.
I am not suprised that they sound better than bose, most speakers do. The Bose sats cut off around 200 Hz and the "Bass Module" only goes down to 60-70 Hz.
WOW i did not think that "bose" was that bad, and in New Zealand as you can probably imagine being far away and all from everything, electronics are quite expensive dad paid a fortune for them. I am glad he only got the sub with 2 sat speakers but it does make sense to buy dedicated speakers. And "bose" only have a mid to high range speaker in their sat speakers so all the high percussion (or how ever you spell it) sounds are very muffled and you can forget about bass but thats why i guess you get the sub.

Sub for low freq sounds and mid to high for main, centre and surround speakers.
The reason i do this is because when your amp/reciever does the signal analysis (ie digital filtering on each channel) it can produce a much higher order filter through mathematical algorithms allowing for much better cut off and pass-band responses which is not possible in the analogue domain. Writing code for a DSP (digital signal processor) to increase filter order is much simpler than having to string heaps of analogue components together and here is why if you are interested.

Or should i say harder to do in the analogue domain thats why the speakers which are 3 way are so much more expensive. Because the signal sent to your speaker is analogue hence you will need high order and low loss analogue filters.

3 filters to be precise:
1 low Pass, for the woofer
1 Band Pass (high low - low high)
1 high Pass, for the tweeter

because filter design is very tricky in the analogue domain especially getting a good frequency response in such a small range. Hence expensive circuitry is required (usually inductor-resistive and capacitive) which also makes the speaker heavier but who really cares about that in the end any way its not like you need to shift it once its all been set up right ! But the big problem is the loss due to the 3 different paralleled filters.
Its pretty simple the higher order the better frequency response you have to the ideal case but the bigger the signal loss you have over the filter which cant be delivered to the speaker and your speakers sound quite.

That is why i use 2 way speakers for everything. Not that i am saying a 3 way speaker is bad, dont get me wrong but to get a good 2 way speaker it costs the same as a dodgey 3 way entry one or more so for anyone on a budget like myself dont get the biggest one thinking it will be best, (+ the misses will have a fit:() that was my decision making for my latest audio set up. a good 3 way speaker requires good analogue filter design which, take my word for is not a very easy task and makes them very expensive for all the engineering efforts gone into the design.

While testing the JENSEN floor standing speakers (3 way) in the store even "tho my god do they look HOT" :cool:!! they do suffer in the bass department and cost as much as a the sub + the bookshelves, i know this is not the case in all (3 way) speakers, there were some DALI floor standing ones next to them which did not have this problem but where again almost twice as expensive.
So your best bet from my point of view to get an excellent sound invest in good bookshelves and add a sub to it and my god your friends will be over every weekend wanting to watch their loved movies on your system ;)

Dont be fooled by the sales man/girl just because the speakers next to them ,the DALI's in my case where twice as expensive means they sound better plus if you add a sub later on it will most likely over power the DALI's woofer anyway so all that extra money would have been wasted and you might as well have a pair of book shelves to begin with.

The only problem is bookshelves suffer from low power handling capabilities mine only are rated for 110W but who really turns their amp up every week to the max, you will be deaf by the end of the year if you do that lol. and i am more interested in clarity not how loud it goes even tho i showed the neighbours who is boss last night with my sub (given i was showing off to my mate a little also).
 
snappy_snoopy

snappy_snoopy

Audioholic
if a manufacturer for speakers states the frequency response of a speaker, say 20Hz to 20KHz then that does not mean that this response range is linear correct ?

I guess they could be the 3dB points or worse. If it is given on a data sheet, and no dB value is given should you assume its the 3dB point, is that the standard for specifying the frequency response ???

Any help on this would be much appreciated as i have noticed even tho speakers out there say they can go down to 30Hz, but all you hear is a little sissy thump then it must be the 3dB point.

Please correct me if a made a mistake :D:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zhimbo

zhimbo

Audioholic General
if a manufacturer for speakers states the frequency response of a speaker, say 20Hz to 20KHz then that does not mean that this response range is linear correct ?

I guess they could be the 3dB points or worse.
Actually, if there is no dB range given, then a frequency range is all but meaningless. The cheapest headphones around all state that their frequency range is 20-20K Hz. Presumably +/-10db, or worse!

+/- 3 dB is the usual standard, and is usually considered acceptably linear...but it's all relative, of course.
 
snappy_snoopy

snappy_snoopy

Audioholic
Actually, if there is no dB range given, then a frequency range is all but meaningless. The cheapest headphones around all state that their frequency range is 20-20K Hz. Presumably +/-10db, or worse!

+/- 3 dB is the usual standard, and is usually considered acceptably linear...but it's all relative, of course.
that is right that is why i was asking, no wonder BOSE does not give any actual specs lol
 
crazystereoman

crazystereoman

Audiophyte
yes i have a jensen qx-85 subwoofer they are so powrful and loud for a 160 watt 10 inch. i
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top