I took a listen to the PSB B25's yesterday and I really liked them. I think I am going to go with a pair of PSB B25's, but I'm not sure which center channel to get. Is the C60 worth the extra $100 if it will not be used in a large room environment? Or is there a difference in clarity and detail as well. They both appear to use the same drivers.
I will also be purchasing an SVS sub, probably the PB10 NSD. I don't think I would need the extra oomph that a 12" driver would offer, as I will probably have the PB10 dialed down quite low as is. If I can find a used SVS that would be even better!
And finally I am going to try and find a used reciever to drive everything. I would like to find something with HDMI functionality, but I don't want to spend much more than, if even $400. I was looking at the Marantz recievers and they looked nice. I have owened a Yamaha HTR, and a Pioneer in the past. Both were nice units but I was looking for something more on the amplification end, as most companies seem so skimp on nice clean power and focus more on features and "peak" power numbers. That is why the Marantz units looked very attractive.
What do you guys think?
I'm the wrong guy to give you advise on your post, as I have PSB and Marantz, and I can sound like Tony the Tiger: "They're Greeeeeeat"!!!!!
C60 is probably overkill for your room, and not worth the extra $100.00. C40 uses 5-1/4" drivers, while C60 uses 6-1/2", same size drivers as the B25's, but C60 is a midrange, while B25's is a woofer. Some people will tell you that it is best if you match exactly the drivers, but in this case the difference, if any, cannot be heard unless you have super ears.
As for the receiver, I have Marantz SR-5001 (Refurb $399.99 from Acc4Less). This receiver is awesome, has plenty of power (80W), and I have no complains using it as my AV control unit. My TV speakers are never used, I hear and control everything with my SR-5001. I use it as 5.1, so the extra surround channels are used to power some outdoor Advent speakers in my backyard terrace, and the sound is totally different as to what they sounded when powered by a 45W Sony receiver (STR-DG125). You can also go for an SR-4001 ($299.99 Refurb from A4L), which is a 5001 with less features.
You will see here lots of people talking about all the features they get in their Onkyo (605) or Yamaha or Sony, but IMO they don't sound like Marantz and if you ask them they don't know what each feature does, nor they use 50% of their receivers features. If you have BR or HD-DVD, yes, you might want to go with a newer series, like Marantz SR-4002 or 5002, Denon's ending in 08, or an Onkyo 605, to take advantage of the new surround formats DD Plus and DTS HD. I have not seen Marantz 02's out in the Refurb market yet, but I have seen Denon's 08's at Dakmart. Onkyo's are so lousy, that they have been available for awhile in the Refurb market (
www.shoponkyo.com and
www.accessories4less.com). HK-247 is also a good receiver (Refurb
www.harmanaudio.com).
(That Onkyo remark was for fun, I'm sure some people won't even read this sentence and will start bashing me for my comment)