A case study on acoustic mismatch between cone and air

V

Vaughan Odendaa

Senior Audioholic
Hi there again,

In my pursuit to improve my knowledge on audio, I ask more questions on the physical operation of cone speakers and the "coupling" that takes place between it and the air.

As I understand it, cone speakers are extremely inefficient and a small percentage of electrical power is converted to mechanical energy. The reasons for this, again, according to my knowledge, are many. One, because the magnetic field and electrical fields are not 100 % efficient, there are eddy currents that reduce overall efficiency.

The suspension has resistance properties, the voice coil has power handling limits and too much input power can result in thermal compression. We also have the enclosure which dictates to a large degree how much overall resistance (or lack thereof) there is going to be within the system.

But the transfer of energy from cone to air is highly inefficent because the cone has mass and it needs to be large to excite a given amount of air. The air also has resistance to motion. Large cones are needed to excite large amounts of air.

Larger drivers can move more air easier because the effective piston area is larger and can "punch" a greater amount of air out in the time required compared to smaller drivers.

But is there something that I'm missing ? Horn loaded speakers have a good impedence match to the air because a large proportion of electrical energy is converted to acoustical energy.

But if someone more knowledgeable than myself (and I'm sure there are here :)) can explain to me how cone speakers have a poor impedence match to the air (and if the reasons I cited have a large influence on it) then I would appreciate it.

Thank you.

--Regards,
 
V

Vaughan Odendaa

Senior Audioholic
I guess I will bump this since no one else has responded. Come on people, I thought this would be a fascinating topic to discuss.

Please. :)
 
V

Vaughan Odendaa

Senior Audioholic
I suppose another bump is in order. :D

--Regards,
 
V

Vaughan Odendaa

Senior Audioholic
I've been a long time reader on this site and I've spoken to plenty of knowledgable people here, but is there a Mark Seaton equivalent ? :D:D

--Regards,
 
V

Vaughan Odendaa

Senior Audioholic
I've read in a few articles that speakers have a poor impedence match to air. This is why I created this thread, to understand this mismatch between the cone and the air that is being displaced by it.

If someone could explain what it essentially means (and why it occurs) I will really appreciate it. Thanks again.

--Regards,
 
no. 5

no. 5

Audioholic Field Marshall
I've read in a few articles that speakers have a poor impedence match to air.
If it helps in understanding any, I believe that horn loaded drivers have a much better impedance match to air than non horn loaded drivers.
 
no. 5

no. 5

Audioholic Field Marshall
This help any?



(it appears that me previous post repeated something you already knew... oops. :eek:)
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top