proshot04

proshot04

Audioholic Intern
does anybody own a Vizio tv. i am thinking of getting one like the VU42LF-42" or the GV42LF-42" . they are full HD but i am unsure of the tv's quality.
 
avaserfi

avaserfi

Audioholic Ninja
They are cheap TVs but they are not quality TVs. I had one and returned it for a more expensive better TV and feel like the new TV is much more worth my money.
 
zildjian

zildjian

Audioholic Chief
My father & I had the same experience as avaserfi did. We got both a Philips and the Vizio, the Vizio picture wasn't near as clear and I can't remember what other issue we had. There's a thread or two about this from the last few months. Try searching the forums here. There is an audible noise hum or whining sound issue that some people have had with Vizio's too. Probably an alright TV, but not the quality that we got for just a couple hundred $ more with the Philips.
 
solomr2

solomr2

Full Audioholic
I have the GV42. I bought it last December.

The TV is great, we haven't had any issues with it at all, and it gets used an awful lot. The one and only real annoying issue is the edge enhancement is not defeatable in HDMI. Otherwise the picture is pretty clear and sharp, the brightness is great especially since the room where we have it is very bright.

We also have an XBOX 360 connected to it, and it really makes the images stand out and super clear with HD games.

Overall it is a very good value. I saw a couple of weeks back Tiger Direct had the 42" GV model for sale at like $799 (not a refurb). That is really, really cheap, and especially so when you see that most 46" -50" 1080p sets are still charging $3000.

This TV is now going to our master bedroom. After years of trying to convince my wife that we need a big screen TV, she caved and let me get the Vizio 42. After 6 months, she now agrees that we need at least a 50" in the family room, so the Vizio will replace the old TV in the BR, and a new 1080p 52" will be coming home (most likely the Sharp 82U).

For my personal media room, which is where my AV gear is and where most HD movies will be shown, I will be getting another high-end 1080p set, although I'm not sure which one. However, for bedroom use I don't think you can beat the Vizio for the price. Sure, there are better TVs out there now, but I haven't seen any at the price that look as good as the Vizio.
 
T

tom67

Full Audioholic
Vizio

check out CNET.com some of their sets get very good marks and they are the top selling sets now in 3 or 4 sizes due to their exposure in Costco, Sams, and Walmart.
 
darien87

darien87

Audioholic Spartan
But my boy LT is the spokesperson, so they MUST be good right???:rolleyes:

It seems like people either love their Vizio's or hate them. I think they're a decent TV, especially given how inexpensive they are. But a TV is not where I'd want to try and save a few bucks. You usually get what you pay for.
 
solomr2

solomr2

Full Audioholic
After your warranty expires, you are basically on your own. They don't have good customer service on repairs.

Check out this: http://hdguru.com/?p=107

:cool:j
I think this is a little over stated and somewhat misleading. I have had to get three pieces of technology fixed in the past 3 or 4 years, out of warranty; a Toshiba TV, a JVC VHS VCR and a Viewsonic computer monitor. And also a GE Microwave oven, within warranty. All are obviously mainstream brands.

The Toshiba repair was by no means cheap or worth it, and I just decided it was cheaper to buy another set than to get it repaired. The manufacturer had a minimum service fee of something like $250 just to look at it, with no guarantee of being able to repair it. Plus I would have to pay for shipping to and from manufacturer (about $250), so my minimum cost would have been $500, not including parts and actual repair. The TV cost me $900 new, and it was about 4 years old when it broke. I bought a new TV. Interestingly enough, I've had a Goldstar TV for over 10 years (an off brand), and it still functions flawlessly.

The JVC VCR was the same thing, only I was told directly by the JVC repair center I should just go out and buy a new one. Minmum charge was something like $150 just to look at it.

The Viewsonic was also the same deal. The minimum repair charge was about $250, plus shipping to and from the repair center in Atlanta (21" monitor that weighs about 70 lbs.). Again, no guarantee of repair. As it turned out, my neighbor's father is a technician at Brandsmart and he repaired it for me - new V-Synch chip, and it ended up costing me $45.

The GE oven was 3 years old, and it was actually still partially covered under warranty (parts only). However, when we called for service the deal was something else. $75 just to send a repairman to look at it (it's a built-in oven, so there was no sending it to the manufacturer), and then labor costs on top of that at $75/hour. This is why I now have an LG oven in my kitchen.

So, buying mainstream name brands may seem like a safer route, but may not be all that this article makes it out to be. In the real world I live in, these off brands can be as much as 30% cheaper, so they often sell for $200-500 cheaper. With technology items like TVs, a lot can change in a year, let alone in 2 or 3 or 5 years. So, if you buy a $1500 Samsung or Hitachi TV today, and in 3 years it breaks, would you be willing to spend $700 to get it repaired? And even if you opted to get it repaired, would you be willing to wait 3, 4 weeks or even longer for the TV to be repaired and returned to you?

I have my doubts about the motivation and purpose of the article in question. I suggest you read some of the customer reviews in various forums and see what kind of problems people often encounter with the name brand models, and the customer service levels. You would be surprised.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top