Dynaudio Loudspeaker Company Exit North America

gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
Dynaudio has announced that it will exit the North American market and permanently shut down its U.S. subsidiary in fall 2026, marking a major shift for one of Denmark's most respected loudspeaker brands. In this article, we examine the possible factors behind this decision, including changing business priorities, rising costs, tariffs, and the challenges of maintaining a presence in the North American market. With nearly 50 years of speaker design heritage, Dynaudio has built a loyal following among audiophiles and music lovers worldwide. Are you a Dynaudio fan? What Dynaudio speakers do you own, and what have your experiences been with this iconic Danish loudspeaker company?

dynaudio.jpg


Read: Why is Dynaudio Leaving North America?
 
adk highlander

adk highlander

Sith Lord
I ended up with KEF with my last upgrade but dynaudio contour 20i were also on my list. This is bad news all around as far as I am concerned. I think this is just the beginning for companies pulling out of the US due to the current administration.
 
S

shadyJ

Speaker of the House
Staff member
This is a shame. I have never heard a Dynaudio speaker that I thought was anything les than really good. I always wanted to review one, but I guess that boat is sailing.
 
H

hole46

Audioholic Intern
This is a shame. I have never heard a Dynaudio speaker that I thought was anything les than really good. I always wanted to review one, but I guess that boat is sailing.
As they say, it’s because of the ccurrent so-called “administraion”


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Big-Q

Big-Q

Junior Audioholic
So Dynaudio is leaving the market because they can't complete with others mentioned in this article, they have lost business in the audio industry, and can't commit to architectural speakers? It is so interesting that others are doing just fine in the current environment.
 
S

shadyJ

Speaker of the House
Staff member
So Dynaudio is leaving the market because they can't complete with others mentioned in this article, they have lost business in the audio industry, and can't commit to architectural speakers? It is so interesting that others are doing just fine in the current environment.
Are you sure those others are doing fine? It's a crowded marketplace. Some brands are certainly doing fine, but loudspeakers is generally not an industry that is making a lot of people rich.
 
M

MrBoat

Audioholic Ninja
There are so many manufacturers now, that I don’t bother choosing any of them. Redundant design overload. JBL, always has something that works for me. The saturated audio market is mostly what steered me towards DIY.

Boomers cant float this ship forever.

Budget audio and the overflowing used market is more exciting than upscale audio. I see WiiM products and marketplace and the likes attracting more new users than anything else.
 
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
So Dynaudio is leaving the market because they can't complete with others mentioned in this article, they have lost business in the audio industry, and can't commit to architectural speakers? It is so interesting that others are doing just fine in the current environment.
Have you listened to their speakers? Most people want to look onine, see prices they like and hit the 'Buy Now button' but that's not how they operate and they shouldn't need to because they want their products to be sold by people who will commit to the brand. I have never sold or heard better-sounding in-ceiling speakers than the Dynaudio I installed for a client.

Almost all other brands have been sold at least once- they either became part of a conglomerate, or were bought because they owned something the buyer wanted, but were too lazy to do for themselves, like Klipsch buying Jamo for CE certification. Jamo had been one of the largest speaker manufacturers on the planet and then, they sold to Klipsch and were decimated.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Times are difficult for almost all businesses.

I think what’s happening to Dynaudio is a little similar to the Velodyne situation. Velodyne used to be huge in the USA. Then they were sold to a German company. For a while I didn’t hear much from Velodyne because they focused their sales in Europe. But Velodyne is still sold in the US today, just not anywhere as big as they used to be.

So I think Dynaudio will focus on Europe and Asia for now, but they may end up still selling in the US later on at a much smaller scale.
 
N

Nondemo01

Audioholic
The focus on Asian markets is telling. They obviously see more growth potential there than here. They have high-volume partnerships with Chinese EV makers while companies that once let them provide OEM gear (Volvo and Volkswagen) went with B&W or HK. Add in the higher regulatory costs and tariffs on their lower-tier, Chinese made items and it probably wasn't sustainable financially. We also have larger dealer buying groups that can force deep discounts on items and Dynaudio probably didn't see enough profit margin to stay.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
Times are difficult for almost all businesses.

I think what’s happening to Dynaudio is a little similar to the Velodyne situation. Velodyne used to be huge in the USA. Then they were sold to a German company. For a while I didn’t hear much from Velodyne because they focused their sales in Europe. But Velodyne is still sold in the US today, just not anywhere as big as they used to be.

So I think Dynaudio will focus on Europe and Asia for now, but they may end up still selling in the US later on at a much smaller scale.
Was Velodyne significant in any audio market other than subwoofers before they concentrated on their cash cow (lidar tech)?
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Was Velodyne significant in any audio market other than subwoofers before they concentrated on their cash cow (lidar tech)?
The only thing I remember about Velodyne was their subwoofers. Gene used to own some Velodyne subs and did some reviews on their subs. I still own some Velodyne subs. It seems like back then it was all about Velodyne and JL Audio subs.
 
Mikado463

Mikado463

Audioholic Spartan
The only thing I remember about Velodyne was their subwoofers. Gene used to own some Velodyne subs and did some reviews on their subs. I still own some Velodyne subs. It seems like back then it was all about Velodyne and JL Audio subs.
Me too (DD-15)
 
T

TankTop5

Audioholic Samurai
Probably shouldn’t have moved most of their production to China. They also used Jupiter to reduce the weight of speakers rather than improve quality.

I’m saying this as a huge Dynaudio speaker fan
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
The focus on Asian markets is telling. They obviously see more growth potential there than here. They have high-volume partnerships with Chinese EV makers while companies that once let them provide OEM gear (Volvo and Volkswagen) went with B&W or HK. Add in the higher regulatory costs and tariffs on their lower-tier, Chinese made items and it probably wasn't sustainable financially. We also have larger dealer buying groups that can force deep discounts on items and Dynaudio probably didn't see enough profit margin to stay.
Dynaudio have been a Chinese company since 2014.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
This is a shame. I have never heard a Dynaudio speaker that I thought was anything les than really good. I always wanted to review one, but I guess that boat is sailing.
The history of Dynaudio is complicated and fascinating.

The origins of Dynaudio are in Israel, under the Morel banner which still exists.

Both Dynaudio and Morel were principally driver companies, and were a major source of OEM drivers, and I bought plenty.

The founder of Morel in Israel was Meir Mordechai. He partnered with two Danes in 1975 forming Dynaudio, Ejvind Skaaning and Gerhard Richter.

All three retained patents. They were superb drivers, especially their mid range D 75 Dome. In my view this is the finest midrange driver ever produced. It easily handles a band from 400 Hz to 5 KHz and is easy to design crossovers for.

I personally own 18 Dynaudio drivers from that era, of which 14 are in daily use. I have four in my larger monitors I used to use for live recording. These are boxed up currently.

In the early eighties I had prolonged correspondence with Ejvind Skaaning. No email then, mail only. We shared a lot design ideas. That was the time of the coherent speaker design craze. So I designed my studio monitors for my editing and mastering studio. Well, it was all very difficult because of driver overlap. That was the most difficult design I ever did. At the same time Dynaudio designed their Conquest with first order crossovers.


The woofer is at the top and the tweeter at the bottom. This because of the 15 degree axis tilt of odd order crossovers.

I decided to make a tall column so I could have the tweeter at the top. I also cheated a little as I wanted to use two KEF B 139s in each speaker. This necessitated an active third order crossover to the Dynaudio mid at 180 Hz.



Those speakers were the most difficult to get right, because of the overlap of first order crossovers. I bet it was four years at least before I was really happy with them.

However there is a funny story, about this. I and the Dynaudio team met up at an audio show at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York.

Now because of the axis tilt, those speakers made it sound as if the music was coming up out of the floor! They became the butt of quite a few jokes over this, but took it all in good part. That is why my speakers are the way they are, so the sound filed is very natural, directed down to the listening position.

Of course this was all really a dead end, as the spacing of the drivers actually puts the "kibosh" on the coherent phase theory, unless the driver was coaxial. Thiel was a proponent of this phase coherent theory.

Unfortunately the Danish owners of Dynaudio wanted to retire and the company was bought by GoerTek Inc. of Weifang China in 2014. So Dynaudio is a Chinese company now. The Dynaudio drivers prior to the sale to Goer Tek used 2.5" voice coils, and were hard to manufacture.

My former location monitors, now my side surround speakers, use all Dynaudio drivers.



However, all is not lost, as Morel are still making essentially a lot of the same original Dynaudio drivers, as they also hold the patents.

These Morel Bass mids are the basis of our inwall system.





The six bass mids and the center mid are from Morel, and use the original patents shared by Dynaudio and Morel.

One last story. The sale of Dynaudio to the Chinese was coincident with our Lake home remodel, and Ejvind Skaaning made two Dynaudio D76 dome midrange drivers available to me, for my family room speakers. I have since been able to source a good spare on eBay, just in case.
 
Verdinut

Verdinut

Audioholic Spartan
The history of Dynaudio is complicated and fascinating.

The origins of Dynaudio are in Israel, under the Morel banner which still exists.

Both Dynaudio and Morel were principally driver companies, and were a major source of OEM drivers, and I bought plenty.

The founder of Morel in Israel was Meir Mordechai. He partnered with two Danes in 1975 forming Dynaudio, Ejvind Skaaning and Gerhard Richter.

All three retained patents. They were superb drivers, especially their mid range D 75 Dome. In my view this is the finest midrange driver ever produced. It easily handles a band from 400 Hz to 5 KHz and is easy to design crossovers for.

I personally own 18 Dynaudio drivers from that era, of which 14 are in daily use. I have four in my larger monitors I used to use for live recording. These are boxed up currently.

In the early eighties I had prolonged correspondence with Ejvind Skaaning. No email then, mail only. We shared a lot design ideas. That was the time of the coherent speaker design craze. So I designed my studio monitors for my editing and mastering studio. Well, it was all very difficult because of driver overlap. That was the most difficult design I ever did. At the same time Dynaudio designed their Conquest with first order crossovers.


The woofer is at the top and the tweeter at the bottom. This because of the 15 degree axis tilt of odd order crossovers.

I decided to make a tall column so I could have the tweeter at the top. I also cheated a little as I wanted to use two KEF B 139s in each speaker. This necessitated an active third order crossover to the Dynaudio mid at 180 Hz.



Those speakers were the most difficult to get right, because of the overlap of first order crossovers. I bet it was four years at least before I was really happy with them.

However there is a funny story, about this. I and the Dynaudio team met up at an audio show at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York.

Now because of the axis tilt, those speakers made it sound as if the music was coming up out of the floor! They became the butt of quite a few jokes over this, but took it all in good part. That is why my speakers are the way they are, so the sound filed is very natural, directed down to the listening position.

Of course this was all really a dead end, as the spacing of the drivers actually puts the "kibosh" on the coherent phase theory, unless the driver was coaxial. Thiel was a proponent of this phase coherent theory.

Unfortunately the Danish owners of Dynaudio wanted to retire and the company was bought by GoerTek Inc. of Weifang China in 2014. So Dynaudio is a Chinese company now. The Dynaudio drivers prior to the sale to Goer Tek used 2.5" voice coils, and were hard to manufacture.

My former location monitors, now my side surround speakers, use all Dynaudio drivers.



However, all is not lost, as Morel are still making essentially a lot of the same original Dynaudio drivers, as they also hold the patents.

These Morel Bass mids are the basis of our inwall system.





The six bass mids and the center mid are from Morel, and use the original patents shared by Dynaudio and Morel.

One last story. The sale of Dynaudio to the Chinese was coincident with our Lake home remodel, and Ejvind Skaaning made two Dynaudio D76 dome midrange drivers available to me, for my family room speakers. I have since been able to source a good spare on eBay, just in case.
I once built a pair of compact MTM loudspeakers using Morel CAW 638 6 inch woofers and an Airborne AMT tweeter. This simple system performed rather well for a very modest outlay. The avatar which I'm using on this site, clearly shows the amazing impedance and phase angle curves of the CAW 638 driver using impedance compensation. With the built cabinets, I was getting an f3 at 37 Hz. By he way, I have never seen such linear curves with commercially built speakers.
 
Last edited:
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top