D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
Didn't read it but am ever more of the opinion less is more. This includes the Reagan Library. If I were prez I do my job and leave. The End. I don't want a library or some other crap that will presumably cost the taxpayers more money. If it doesn't cost the taxpayers money than by all means do what you want. However, unlike some of the people in office I'd like to believe I am a true fiscal conservative.


1780478965988.png

Inside Obama's audacious, near-windowless, $850m presidential library...
 
William Lemmerhirt

William Lemmerhirt

Audioholic Overlord
Didn't read it but am ever more of the opinion less is more. This includes the Reagan Library. If I were prez I do my job and leave. The End. I don't want a library or some other crap that will presumably cost the taxpayers more money. If it doesn't cost the taxpayers money than by all means do what you want. However, unlike some of the people in office I'd like to believe I am a true fiscal conservative.


View attachment 79695
Inside Obama's audacious, near-windowless, $850m presidential library...
Not to mention that thing is Fuuuuuugleeee!
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
A Moment of Retarded? A Moment of Trump Worm? A Moment of Politically Convenient? About on par with the first ICE shooting where people actually donated a million to gofundme for the agent who shot the woman in the car. :confused:


During the Minnesota Republican Party's endorsement convention held in Duluth, delegates voted to hold a brief moment of silence and prayer for Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer convicted of murdering George Floyd.

The tribute, proposed from the convention floor by a delegate, sparked intense backlash. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison publicly condemned the action as an act of "profound cruelty" to the Floyd family. State GOP leaders later distanced themselves from the gesture, emphasizing that it was a spontaneous floor action initiated by the body rather than an official party program or platform.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
I get it George Floyd wasn't the most upstanding person, but a moment of silence and prayer for Derek Chauvin? :oops:
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
Good news is the guy who called for a moment of silence is almost certain to lose.


>>>Rocco said in a call with the Reformer that, after Saturday, people in his district, which encompasses parts of St. Paul and West St. Paul, encouraged him to run for Minnesota Senate. He said he plans to file for candidacy Tuesday. He’ll almost certainly lose: Kamala Harris defeated President Donald Trump in the district by more than 50 percentage points. Rocco declined to say who he supported in the endorsement; a photo in the Pioneer Press shows Rocco giving Qualls a hug after Qualls won.<<<
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
Floyd's death is divisive to Republicans because a) he resisted arrest, and c) a riot took place. Basically they'd rather not address b) Chauvin kneeled on his neck for nearly 10 minutes. I imagine many Republicans have not even watched the video, or worse they have and decided to change the narrative. B does not justify C, but I'd have to assume they prefer to pretend B does not exist.
 
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
Floyd's death is divisive to Republicans because a) he resisted arrest, and c) a riot took place. Basically they'd rather not address b) Chauvin kneeled on his neck for nearly 10 minutes. I imagine many Republicans have not even watched the video, or worse they have and decided to change the narrative. B does not justify C, but I'd have to assume they prefer to pretend B does not exist.
And the ME said he would have been dead from the drugs in his system in a short time but it absolutely should not have happened. OTOH, he shouldn't be presented as a hero and he didn't have any serious crimes once he moved to Minnesota. Helluva job by Chauvin as a training officer, eh?

The crowd did NOTHING to stop the cops and I found that odd- nobody wants to be shot, but they would have to kill everyone and grab the phones & destroy the surveillance cameras in order to get away with it and even then, they'd probably have to clear the whole block. Do you really think nobody in that crowd had a gun? Statistically, I dont think it's likely and I'm not posting that because of racism, it's because so many have guns when they shouldn't AND it's likely that someone was a legal carrier. Even if the crowd had been white as a sheet of paper, SOMEONE would have had a gun.

Riots solve nothing, with the possible exception of destroying buildings and neighborhoods that the city wanted to remove but didn't want to spend the money upfront.

I would like to see cities form groups specifically for interacting with citizen groups for the sole purpose of dealing with these problems before they're out of control, but emotional people don't care about that and they will not wait. Where are the citizen groups, anyway?

I don't know a lot about Minnesota's government and don't want t ouse news blathering about it but I'm not sure it's right to blame Republicans- MLPS is run by Democrats and it was Democrats who destroyed the cities- DFL in the state legislature has a one member advantage. MLPS PD had/has bad officers (I think most PDs do, even if they say they're working on the problem)- multiple cities outside of MLPS had nothing to do with it, yet they suffered.

Wait- a moment of silence for Chauvin? Why?
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top