JFK 2nd Shooter

[Squishman]

I watched an intriguing documentary on yt last night by https://youtube.com/@charlesbugni?si=movzYCVbouAVDAeg
He says a famous photo shows the second shooter and he's not in the grassy knoll. I've been to Dealy Plaza twice in my life. Took a lot of photos. I visited the 6th Floor Museum and also stood upon the pedestal that Abe Zapruder filmed from. Anyway, I think this guy may be seriously on to something.

 

[Squishman]

Why is Troll giggling? Who cares about that clown.

 

[Swerd]

I’m old enough to easily remember the day Kennedy was killed. I was in 10th grade and was soon to turn 15 years old.

Yes, the entire country was highly dissatisfied by the official explanations over what happened. In the next 10 years, there was an amazingly long list of conspiracy theories to explain things. None of them had any legs to them. If they did there would’ve been some convincing & corroborating evidence. We saw nothing.

Since then, there’s been a few recurrent theories, such as the one about a second shooter. But they’re nothing but rumors with no evidence for them, and also no evidence against them.

I think of them as no different than the occasional report that this time they’ve really found Amelia Earhart’s missing airplane. These stories would bounce around for a couple of days or weeks and then fade away.

I don’t see any difference between the Amelia Earhart stories and the newest conspiracy theory for JFK’s death.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Where is the 3rd shooter's nest?

 

[Squishman]

Where is the 3rd shooter's nest?

Watch the video. No 3rd shooter according to this guy.

 

[Squishman]

I’m old enough to easily remember the day Kennedy was killed. I was in 10th grade and was soon to turn 15 years old.

Yes, the entire country was highly dissatisfied by the official explanations over what happened. In the next 10 years, there was an amazingly long list of conspiracy theories to explain things. None of them had any legs to them if they did there would’ve been some corroborating evidence and we saw nothing.

Since then, there’s been a few recurrent theories, such as the one about the second shooter. But they’re nothing but rumors with no evidence for them.

I think of them as no different than the occasional report that this time they’ve really found Amelia Earhart’s missing airplane. The story would bounce around for a couple of days or weeks and then fade away.

I don’t see any difference between the Amelia Earhart stories and the newest conspiracy theory for JFK’s death.

Are you just replying without seeing what this guy says in the video?

 

[Trell]

Where is the 3rd shooter's nest?

Wasn’t that Oswalds grand mother roosting there?

 

[Squishman]

So I guess what you do here is reply as a know-it-all without watching jack squat what this guy says he discovered.

 

[ryanosaur]

Fcuk.
Just had a brilliant idea.

@gene , please introduce a microtransaction model for anybody to post what they want in the Steam Vent! You'll get rich, and I'll only ask for 5% as a fee for my idea, please.

 

[mtrycrafts]

I watched an intriguing documentary on yt last night by https://youtube.com/@charlesbugni?si=movzYCVbouAVDAeg
He says a famous photo shows the second shooter and he's not in the grassy knoll. I've been to Dealy Plaza twice in my life. Took a lot of photos. I visited the 6th Floor Museum and also stood upon the pedestal that Abe Zapruder filmed from. Anyway, I think this guy may be seriously on to something.

Which clip? There are 4 videos, hour+ each.

 

[Squishman]

Which clip? There are 4 videos, hour+ each.

Here ya go.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Yep, lots of blobs connected to make a person. One can see whatever the mind wants to see from blobs like clouds or burnt images on toasts.

 

[Squishman]

Yep, lots of blobs connected to make a person. One can see whatever the mind wants to see from blobs like clouds or burnt images on toasts.

Waay more to it than what he says about the photo in the first 5 minutes. The shot through the windshield, headshot angle, etc. Firecracker at the grassy knoll is another interesting factor.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Waay more to it than what he says about the photo in the first 5 minutes. The shot through the windshield, headshot angle, etc. Firecracker at the grassy knoll is another interesting factor.

I'd like to see a windshield with a head on shop of same caliber to see what is left behind, how large of a crack it makes and what the driver would have felt in that instant, face full of glass shards?

 

[Squishman]

I'd like to see a windshield with a head on shop of same caliber to see what is left behind, how large of a crack it makes and what the driver would have felt in that instant, face full of glass shards?

Did you watch this guy's video?

 

[mtrycrafts]

Did you watch this guy's video?

a good part of it

 

[Swerd]

So I guess what you do here is reply as a know-it-all without watching jack squat what this guy says he discovered.

I was in Washington DC when the assassination occurred. I witnessed JFK's funeral procession on Pennsylvania Ave in Washington. My birthday was that same day, 25 Nov 1963. Schools were closed that painful Monday.

That does not make me a know-it-all. But it does qualify me as being sick & tired of all those earnest, even well meaning, conspiracy claims about JFK's assassination. Please tell me that none of the authors of those 1,000 to 2,000 books weren't in it for the money:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

The assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, has spawned numerous conspiracy theories. These theories allege the involvement of the CIA, the Mafia, Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, Cuban Prime Minister Fidel Castro, the KGB, or some combination of these individuals and entities. Some conspiracy theories have alleged a coverup by parts of the federal government, such as the original FBI investigators, the Warren Commission, or the CIA. Former Los Angeles District Attorney Vincent Bugliosi estimated that a total of 42 groups, 82 assassins, and 214 people had been accused at one time or another in various conspiracy scenarios.

The number of books written about the assassination of Kennedy has been estimated to be between 1,000 and 2,000. According to Bugliosi, 95% of those books are "pro-conspiracy and anti-Warren Commission". Very few of the books and articles published about the assassination have been written by historians. Calvin Trillin's article, "The Buffs" in the June 1967 edition of The New Yorker, has been credited as the first addressing the "conspiracy phenomenon".

Which clip? There are 4 videos, hour+ each.

If the OP provides a working link to that YouTube video, plus time points to evidence or direct claims in any of those 1+ hour videos, I'll add it to that list of 1,000 to 2,000 books that accuse 42 different groups, 82 assassins, & 214 people.

 

[Squishman]

The angles don't work if you believe the second shooter was at the grassy knoll. The angles are accurate with what this guy says. Plus anyone who has even a small bit of knowledge about it knows that there was a bullet hole in the windshield front to back. There are photos of that bullet hole. That hole lines up with this theory. This is all a moot point for those who believe Lee Oswald (or whoever was at the 6th floor window) acted alone. If there was a second shooter, then you would agree he must have somewhere, correct?

 

[Trell]

That does not make me a know-it-all. But it does qualify me as being sick & tired of all those earnest, even well meaning, conspiracy claims about JFK's assassination. Please tell me that none of the authors of those 1,000 to 2,000 books weren't in it for the money:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

I've seen the same with the assassination of the Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme in 1986. The Swedish "market" is much smaller, though, compared to USA. With the respect to the OP claims: Color me sceptical.

Assassination of Olof Palme - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Trell]

The angles don't work if you believe the second shooter was at the grassy knoll. The angles are accurate with what this guy says. Plus anyone who has even a small bit of knowledge about it knows that there was a bullet hole in the windshield front to back. There are photos of that bullet hole. That hole lines up with this theory. This is all a moot point for those who believe Lee Oswald (or whoever was at the 6th floor window) acted alone. If there was a second shooter, then you would agree he must have somewhere, correct?

The great economist Robert Solow did have a talent for quotable quotes and here is one that sums it up for me in this thread:

>>>Robert Solow (1984): Conversations with Economists: “Suppose someone sits down where you are sitting right now and announces to me that he is Napoleon Bonaparte. The last thing I want to do with him is to get involved in a technical discussion of cavalry tactics at the battle of Austerlitz. If I do that, I’m getting tacitly drawn into the game that he is Napoleon. Now, Bob Lucas and Tom Sargent like nothing better than to get drawn into technical discussions, because then you have tacitly gone along with their fundamental assumptions; your attention is attracted away from the basic weakness of the whole story. Since I find that fundamental framework ludicrous, I respond by treating it as ludicrous–that is, by laughing at it–so as not to fall into the trap of taking it seriously and passing on to matters of technique.<<<

Must-Read: Robert Solow: Conversations with Economists

Must-Read: Me? I’m happy talking about cavalry tactics with Austerlitz–even to people who have it wrong. But I’m overwhelmingly annoyed with people who use their fake and false knowledge about cavalry tactics at Austerlitz to criticize those who are actually applying stuff they know to make...

equitablegrowth.org