Bose acquires Mcintosh

J

jpclyons

Audiophyte
Since there is no mention of an EQ, which was required by all previous 901 models, these might look great, but sound awful. I could make a fiberglass body of a Lamborghini, but that would not be a Lamborghini. Now if the EQ was built in to the speaker…..
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
Since there is no mention of an EQ, which was required by all previous 901 models, these might look great, but sound awful. I could make a fiberglass body of a Lamborghini, but that would not be a Lamborghini. Now if the EQ was built in to the speaker…..
The EQ box is in the photo and it is mentioned in the article. Sadly, it appears to be the same passive EQ from the original design and the same drivers too.
 
T

TheMcRae

Audiophyte
So that is Mac and Sonus Faber down the tubes then. That really puts a full stop at the end of an era.
I have spent years listing to an MC 2300 with c33 (brought up to spec by the late, famous Terry Dewick) and 4 series 2 901's properly set up in a music room.
 
isolar8001

isolar8001

Audioholic General
In the series "Only Murders In The Building" , Steve Martin's character has a pair of 901's in his posh apartment.
 
Cos

Cos

Audioholic Samurai
BOSE1.jpg

No one will ever question how AWESOME my photo editing skills are..........NOTo_O I know this is political and I apologize, but I hold my opinion of BOSE on the same level as this guy......Also adding that I am not a liberal democrat or even a democrat...
 
eljr

eljr

Audioholic General
Only thing ever “good” about McIntosh were the amps aesthetics and the bragging rights because everyone knew that they cost more money than other amps.

Like the B&W 800 Diamond series speakers - aesthetics and bragging rights for costing a lot more money.
I never bragged about my Mac mono blocks or 800 diamonds.
Rather
I enjoyed them.

Peace
 
everettT

everettT

Audioholic Spartan
I never bragged about my Mac mono blocks or 800 diamonds.
Rather
I enjoyed them.

Peace
Maybe he is referring about pride of ownership as much as "bragging". I enjoyed my Mc gear, but I wouldn't lift one now to save my life

Edit: I never had fault with any of McIntosh pieces, just no need for a 100+ pound stereo amp and definitely no need for a 160 pound 1.2kw anp in a day were 30 pounds of 1kw heatsinked class D is state of the art.

I imagine anyone could design a beautiful faceplate if it boiled down to aesthetics. With the difference in cost, the sky may be the limit.
 
Last edited:
T

TankTop5

Audioholic Field Marshall
Bose at one time had some of the best marketing in the audio industry but that has been a long time. If they brought that back I could see this purchase making sense. That said McIntosh and Sonus Faber are already in a ton of HiFi shops. Maybe they just wanted market share and think the economy is going to turn, buy low and sell high.
 
highfigh

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
The EQ box is in the photo and it is mentioned in the article. Sadly, it appears to be the same passive EQ from the original design and the same drivers too.
But, but, but, passive sounds better! Have you tested Bose 901s? I have a problem with a speaker that NEEDS such drastic equalization. Any speaker can sound good with some program material, but holy hand grenades! Have you heard them without the equalizer?

I hope they have improved the drivers.
 
T

Tankini

Senior Audioholic
View attachment 71072
No one will ever question how AWESOME my photo editing skills are..........NOTo_O I know this is political and I apologize, but I hold my opinion of BOSE on the same level as this guy......Also adding that I am not a liberal democrat or even a democrat...
All Waves huh. Today's BOSE isn't your MeMUMs BOSE. :D
 
KenM10759

KenM10759

Audioholic Ninja
Autoformers in the output stages in this day and age are silly. Why would you want an amplifier to deliver the same power in 8, 4 and 2 ohm loads and add all of that hysterisis to the output that isn't a problem for modern solidstate amplifiers. Build quality and aesthetics aside, I see little appeal to owning a Mcintosh amplifier product.
For me, adding to that is indeed the aesthetics. I can't tolerate the gaudy backlit green logos plastered together with the oversized blue meters. Oddly enough, a good portion of those who buy it also add to it posters and equally gaudy signs. All for amps of debatable performance and certainly questionable value.

I'll remain happy with my conservatively designed yet high functional Luxman gear.

Bose is another matter. Ethically, I can't stand them. My son worked for them in customer support, and was doing well when they shipped his job and that of some 350 of his coworkers to a subcontractor in the Philippines. I won't own any of their stuff.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top