Yeah, sorry, meant to include that I tried it without the EQ and had similar results to the bypass. I did try new cables, no difference. The new amp doesn't have a Tape Monitor so it's CD=>EQ=>Amp.
I kinda assumed that the signal strength Pre- and Post- EQ might hurt the credibility of the difference.
Why an EQ? Because every record, every CD is produced so differently... I've always had one! (And though I grew up a Giants fan from the Scott Brunner years through Ray Handley and Eli... Now that I'm in the PNW, I have to say I was not that pleased on Sunday). And I firmly believe that even a decent EQ improves the sound of any system.
Here's some more fun facts:
- Same song on LP - no "defect"
Same song on FLAC - through same inputs as CD player - no "defect"
- CD player plugged into EQ, but the amplifier has "CD Player" selected (with nothing plugged into amp's CD inputs), no music but the crackly interference, on the beat, pops through the right speaker
(ditto any unused input into the amp)
So, yeah, it looks like it's EQ. But I can't explain why it's CD only and not all other digital inputs - even through the same ports and cables.
(
This is the EQ. Not a great one, but my shopping options were limited.I miss J & R.... Although I think I bought the original at 47th Street Photo in 1981....)