Could be. I’m by no means a wood expert. When I was studying sound proofing and transmission loss I had to pick a topic for a end of course paper and chose the transmission loss properties of common loudspeaker enclosure materials above and below the resonant frequency. The only reason I know much of anything about this is that paper. A while after finishing the paper I posted a bunch of my conclusions over on AVS and it created a bit of controversy too, oddly enough.
I didn’t have the ability to do much real world testing so most of what I did was theoretical, modeling, or very specific tests using a contact microphone accelerometer. Still, nothing I found was in any way different from what is accepted in the industry.
Plus, as
@shadyJ likes to remind me, none of this was ever tested in listening tests or any reasonable kind. It’s not like we have any idea if any of this stuff matters.
For instance both models of and actual tests of enclosures show that they proruce non-linear distortion along with some linear distortion (can negatively impact the polar response, steady state response, and add group delay. Yet surely the driver is going to remain the dominant source of this for the most part. So does it matter? It’s easy to dismiss, but truth be told, we have no idea. Still, it’s super easy to get rid of using proper enclosure design steps like composite damped wall construction, appropriate bracing, internal damping, etc. most of this isn’t very expensive.