Yamaha 2080 or Denon 3400 receiver

A

AudioSteve

Audiophyte
Trouble deciding what AV receiver to buy. Current system is a 5.1 with a Pioneer Elite VSX-21TXH receiver, Martin Logan Motion 40 fronts, Motion 8 center, Motion FX surrounds, Dynamo 700 Sub and a Panasonic 60" Plasma. Would like to upgrade Receiver and maybe a second sub. I want a good quality receiver for music as well as Home theater. The living room area is 21' x 18' and one side opens into the kitchen area, so it's not optimal. Thinking about adding a second sub if the room is not to small, so I would like discrete sub outputs on receiver. Also maybe adding two ceiling speakers. The Yamaha RX-A2080 seems to be the starting point with discrete sub outputs and I'm not familiar with Denon (X3300W - X3500W but they seem to be loaded with many features. I'm open to suggestions.
 
R

ricks1978

Audiophyte
Trouble deciding what AV receiver to buy. Current system is a 5.1 with a Pioneer Elite VSX-21TXH receiver, Martin Logan Motion 40 fronts, Motion 8 center, Motion FX surrounds, Dynamo 700 Sub and a Panasonic 60" Plasma. Would like to upgrade Receiver and maybe a second sub. I want a good quality receiver for music as well as Home theater. The living room area is 21' x 18' and one side opens into the kitchen area, so it's not optimal. Thinking about adding a second sub if the room is not to small, so I would like discrete sub outputs on receiver. Also maybe adding two ceiling speakers. The Yamaha RX-A2080 seems to be the starting point with discrete sub outputs and I'm not familiar with Denon (X3300W - X3500W but they seem to be loaded with many features. I'm open to suggestions.
When you refer to discreet sub outputs, do you mean actual sub outputs or are you talking pre-outs for all channels? Because all modern receivers made by Denon, Marantz, Yamaha, Onkyo, Sony, and other brands (Anthem, Cambridge, etc.) have sub outputs built in. If they are 7.1 channel, for example, they will have 1 discreet sub output. If 7.2, they will have 2 discreet sub outs. You can use splitters to expand to more subs if needed as well.

But if you mean pre-outs for each channel, you will have to go with their upper tiered products in general to get that.

Denons have a laid back, smooth sound. You will either like it or hate it, and it changes a bit according to what class Denon you get (with more expensive models being a little richer and warmer sounding). They are good for music and movies and I personally like the sound. They tend to have a warmer tone (especially for the X3500 and such you are looking at),so they go well with Aluminum, dome, or leaf tweeters. The X3500 does have pre-outs and has Audyssey Multi-EQ XT32 room correction, which is one of the best if not the best room correction available for consumer level gear. Just shut off Dynamic EQ and turn up your sub a bit and surrounds 1 dB higher. Dynamic EQ is only good for low level listening, it does work well to preserve low frequency sound and surround sound at low volumes, but it sounds unnatural for music and such at normal to louder volumes. I personally never use it.

Yamahas have a slightly cooler sound than mid-higher tiered Denons, but more forward sounding as well. They are good for music and movies, and Yamaha has nice DSP modes to tailor the sound. YPAO never worked well in my room, but it usually works well. It is definitely inferior to higher level Audyssey versions found in Marantz, Denon, and older Onkyos. I found it inaccurate for speaker settings and speaker sizes, but I could have had a defective setup mic?

Now I just got a Marantz SR7012, and I can say with certainty if you want increased audio performance and want pre-outs, latest features, and the best sound quality for the price paid, go for Marantz. Same company that makes Denon, D+M holdings. Marantz has better audio circuitry and more inputs than a comparable Denon, and sound better for music with a warmer and more musical sound. I have consistently found my Marantz receivers to be my favorites. The only thing with Marantz is you are going to pay more than the Denon equivalent. But I would go with a SR5012 (or SR5013 if you can swing the extra money). You can also look at refurbished units if you want more bang for buck, but you won't get the same warranty.

Denon you get more features for the money, but they won't sound as good as a Marantz. Marantz has more inputs and always pre-outs, heavier builds than Denon, and special circuitry called HDAM which makes it sound better than Denon. It is not snake oil, made up stuff either. There is a definite sound quality difference in Marantz.

No matter what you go with, you cannot go far wrong. But if you want sound quality, features, pre-outs, 7.1 inputs, and the best room correction? Marantz is an easy choice and my favorite brand. Trust me, I have tried multiple models from each maker of receivers and my Marantz units have always been a bit better than the rest. The only thing you need to consider with Marantz is the portal design. I like it, but it is not everyone's cup of tea.
 
Last edited:
S

snakeeyes

Audioholic Ninja
I have the Yamaha 2060 (from 2016) and it does have separate sub adjustments for each sub out. I’m currently only running one sub in that room though. I do run dual subs in another room but it’s a much larger room. :)
 
A

AudioSteve

Audiophyte
Rick1978,
I was referring to separate sub outputs that are adjusted individually. Not sure if my room is to small for 2 subs. Because I was thinking of adding a rear sub. The Martin Logan motion 40's (Front speakers) have subs built in also. I have them setup in bi-amp configuration also. We have 10' ceiling to.
 
S

snakeeyes

Audioholic Ninja
In my living room it opens to the kitchen on one side like that and I did dual HSU VTF2 MK5 subs. They are ported 12in.subs. If I add up all that space including the kitchen, it’s 4300 cubic feet of volume total. One sub is in the front and the other is in the back of the room.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Marantz has better audio circuitry and more inputs than a comparable Denon, and sound better for music with a warmer and more musical sound.
I respect you subjective view, but it is subjective. The fact is, the SR7012 and AVR-X4400H share pages of schematics and electronic parts. The only main difference I can see is that Marantz added the so called HDAM modules as a buffer stage at the pre out stage. I have compared my Marantz and Denon by ears and by some measurements and I am comfortable to say all else being equal, the HDAM won't make a difference for SQ, and they shouldn't. Many Marantz audiophile models (I have a vintage pairs too) have no HDAM, and were known to have the golden sound (who knows, really?). Most people don't use the "more" inputs that you probably meant the 7.1 analog inputs, so in that case they would be paying for the additional cost for the unit to be even more jam-packed than they already are.

Again, you hear what you hear, but the OP may or may not hear the same, while objective facts and specs, though not to be rely upon 100 either, are at least objective.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Rick1978,
I was referring to separate sub outputs that are adjusted individually. Not sure if my room is to small for 2 subs. Because I was thinking of adding a rear sub. The Martin Logan motion 40's (Front speakers) have subs built in also. I have them setup in bi-amp configuration also. We have 10' ceiling to.
My room is smaller than yours and I have 5 subs in use there. If reliability is most important to you, you may want to get the RX-A2080. For values, the AVR-X4400H and SR7012 are hard to beat. D&M's XT32 sub EQ HT can dial in your two subs nicely, and with the Editor App you can choose to cutoff EQ to the higher frequency point of your choice. They also can do 11.1 whereas I think the RX-A2080 is limited to 9.1 (by memory only).

If you don't need 7.1 analog, the Denon will save you $200-$300 street price, unless you want to have the Marantz HDAM modules, that, to me is transparent and that means they won't practically add/subtract anything, just marketing hypes. They do offer theoretical differences, but for AVRs, as Dr. Rich called it out before, they are typically bottleneck by the weakest link (e.g. certain LSI chips) that rules.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
When you refer to discreet sub outputs, do you mean actual sub outputs or are you talking pre-outs for all channels? Because all modern receivers made by Denon, Marantz, Yamaha, Onkyo, Sony, and other brands (Anthem, Cambridge, etc.) have sub outputs built in. If they are 7.1 channel, for example, they will have 1 discreet sub output. If 7.2, they will have 2 discreet sub outs. You can use splitters to expand to more subs if needed as well.


.
Most 7.2 avrs do not have discrete sub pre-outs, just a split signal. Some do have the ability to set level/delay separately for each of the two sub pre-outs, tho.

Your subjective descriptions...meh.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Most 7.2 avrs do not have discrete sub pre-outs, just a split signal. Some do have the ability to set level/delay separately for each of the two sub pre-outs, tho.

Your subjective descriptions...meh.
On the subjective note, he seemed to have made up his mind about the "Marantz sound" based on his subjective impressions. Having owned a few of their products, I know the effects could also be described using his own word "mirage" iirc, used in another thread, lol..

In case the OP is interested, I thought it may be worth posting Dr. Rich's findings again:

https://hometheaterhifi.com/technical/technical-reviews/options-by-supplier-and-price/

A key takeaway: circuit quality in the direct mode (stereo or 7.1) is almost always invariant to AVR prices in the range of $400 to $2,000. As examples, the $250 Yamaha RX-V367 and Marantz AV8801 ($3000) use the same Renesas LSI chip (R2A15220FP). With the LSI analog chip in these products, the sound of the direct mode is relatively constant, although a more robust power supplies, addition a quality output buffer and enhanced DC blocking capacitor quality can make small differences.
Note that same LSI chip was still found in the AV8802A that has the revised/upgraded HDAM modules to include a few more discrete parts, so it begs the question, what is the point..aside from marketing benefits.

I think the OP can do well in focusing on sound quality related audio specs, features, reported reliability record, power requirements, and available bench test results but not subjective reviews and hearsay on perceive sound quality.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Doesn't Marantz/Denon have that "McIntosh" sound, while Yamaha has that "Mark Levinson" sound? :D

Or does Denon have that "Krell" sound? :eek:

I can't remember which one was sweeter, more chocolaty, or airy.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top