hooking receiver's inline=record out to auxillary in

[redd454]

i have been trying to link four receiver's, as i have been advised on this site, begining with yamaha rx-v0295-next another rx- v0295 next, rx-v1070/870, lastly sherwood r-5-- or harmon/kardon rv-20, now, as i have been advised, on this site, i have attempted this many times, rear pannel of begining rx-v0295 record out rca jacks left side receiver, right under the #4 that iss inline as 1 2 3 4, then to auxilliary in, for now, on the sherwood r-500, this will not be my final set up, yet i'm useing these two for trial before moving on, i'm assuming on front pannel, record out/zone two and source/remote on the rx-v0295, are located top dead center, all together in one selection, the way it's marked, for if you turn to left or right, you select something other than record out or source, if i'm incorrect someone please tell me. thank you once again, if not, i shall go from mian's, but i don't really wan't to increase power,, just have the same sound, as first reciver produces passed through the rest, and still be able to utilize each receiver's remote for volume/tone only

 

[WaynePflughaupt]

Hard to make heads of tails out of a 193 word sentence...

There is no such thing as a RX-V0295. Did you mean 2095?

Same with Sherwood R-5 and HK RV-20 – internet searches turn up nothing.

Regardless, you can connect the record output to an input such as CD or AUX of the next receiver (not tape or VCR). Then, the record out of that receiver to an input of the third, and so on. The only trick is, the source components connected to the first receiver must be using analog connections, not digital.

Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt

 

[redd454]

Hard to make heads of tails out of a 193 word sentence...

There is no such thing as a RX-V0295. Did you mean 2095?

Same with Sherwood R-5 and HK RV-20 – internet searches turn up nothing.

Regardless, you can connect the record output to an input such as CD or AUX of the next receiver (not tape or VCR). Then, the record out of that receiver to an input of the third, and so on. The only trick is, the source components connected to the first receiver must be using analog connections, not digital.

Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt

 

[redd454]

thanks for the input , but my yamaha manual, as well as unit say rx-vo295 and old sherwood r-500 right on unit, i have no problem finding their diagram's online, under those #'s, one cannot get the sherwood r-500 manual any longer, yet i find it hard to beleive, an expert in this feild, does not recognize, the old flag ship yamaha rx-vo295,, at purchace date this unit was 1,300 dollars, perhap's not the highest, but high enough for me, i asked for help, i find it amazing you have the dezire to count the words in my inquiry

 

[redd454]

thanks for the input , but my yamaha manual, as well as unit say rx-vo295 and old sherwood r-500 right on unit, i have no problem finding their diagram's online, under those #'s, one cannot get the sherwood r-500 manual any longer, yet i find it hard to beleive, an expert in this feild, does not recognize, the old flag ship yamaha rx-vo295,, at purchace date this unit was 1,300 dollars, perhap's not the highest, but high enough for me, i asked for help, i find it amazing you have the dezire to count the words in my inquiry

 

[redd454]

Hard to make heads of tails out of a 193 word sentence...

There is no such thing as a RX-V0295. Did you mean 2095?

Same with Sherwood R-5 and HK RV-20 – internet searches turn up nothing.

Regardless, you can connect the record output to an input such as CD or AUX of the next receiver (not tape or VCR). Then, the record out of that receiver to an input of the third, and so on. The only trick is, the source components connected to the first receiver must be using analog connections, not digital.

Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt

 

[redd454]

i, am using analog selections, the only reason i tryed it, is because that is what i was advised to do, by so many on this site, anyway i will use the sure fire way, main out to main in and so on, don't really wan't to give following receiver's more power, but i suppose i can control that with their remotes/volume ect. thanks

 

[highfigh]

i, am using analog selections, the only reason i tryed it, is because that is what i was advised to do, by so many on this site, anyway i will use the sure fire way, main out to main in and so on, don't really wan't to give following receiver's more power, but i suppose i can control that with their remotes/volume ect. thanks

Where do you live? If you can buy this https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/HeadAmp4--art-headamp-4-4-ch-headphone-amplifier?mrkgcl=28&mrkgadid=3248787994&rkg_id=0&product_id=HeadAmp4&campaigntype=shopping&campaign=aaShopping - Core - Studio & Recording&adgroup=Studio & Recording - Studio Monitors&placement=google&adpos=1o1&creative=213185928374&device=c&matchtype=&network=g&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI--bnpZ3W3QIV2FuGCh28zw0BEAQYASABEgJXBvD_BwE, you can take the Rec Out from one unit and send it to up to four more, as well as control the level if adjustments are needed.

 

[redd454]

Where do you live? If you can buy this https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/HeadAmp4--art-headamp-4-4-ch-headphone-amplifier?mrkgcl=28&mrkgadid=3248787994&rkg_id=0&product_id=HeadAmp4&campaigntype=shopping&campaign=aaShopping - Core - Studio & Recording&adgroup=Studio & Recording - Studio Monitors&placement=google&adpos=1o1&creative=213185928374&device=c&matchtype=&network=g&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI--bnpZ3W3QIV2FuGCh28zw0BEAQYASABEgJXBvD_BwE, you can take the Rec Out from one unit and send it to up to four more, as well as control the level if adjustments are needed.

i may have this unit, i'm not sure, still boxed, it has four out/puts, not sure on in /puts, i live in madison indiana, i will look at unit and see, before buying

 

[redd454]

i looked at the sweetwater unit, it is much smaller than mine in length only, my unit is about as long or wide as an old equlizer, and maybe 2" deep it's 4 volume control's are on rear pannel, it may be a line leveler?

 

[redd454]

i may have this unit, i'm not sure, still boxed, it has four out/puts, not sure on in /puts, i live in madison indiana, i will look at unit and see, before buying

thanks, this unit might work not sure, all my jacks are and in no way, a'm i recording, just trying to link four receiver's together, with same tv or undisturbed sound, music ect. useing controls off of first receiver for selections, other remotes per. following receiver, for volume and tone on each of them
it would seem, i would need to get adapters, for my receiver's, do not have these 1/4" jacks, only on ear/phones

 

[BMXTRIX]

Can you post a link to the Yamaha you are using? Either a manual or a image of the back of the unit?

There certainly is no obvious reason why you can't use the record out, as described originally, to feed from one unit to the other. As long as you are on the right input on every subsequent receiver, you should be able to get the audio into it just fine.

Certainly, getting an audio distribution unit (DA) is a slightly better way of doing things. A product like this is really the ideal type of unit...
https://www.zackelectronics.com/stereo-audio-distribution-amplifier-1x4.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjwuafdBRDmARIsAPpBmVXT3k5fCW_kWh_ZOGBMuZheuqGA0GPHPL9m9PpV0M2pCu07kZ8Iq8waAtD_EALw_wcB

It gives you all RCA connections and full distribution across several receivers.

 

[redd454]

Can you post a link to the Yamaha you are using? Either a manual or a image of the back of the unit?

There certainly is no obvious reason why you can't use the record out, as described originally, to feed from one unit to the other. As long as you are on the right input on every subsequent receiver, you should be able to get the audio into it just fine.

Certainly, getting an audio distribution unit (DA) is a slightly better way of doing things. A product like this is really the ideal type of unit...
https://www.zackelectronics.com/stereo-audio-distribution-amplifier-1x4.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjwuafdBRDmARIsAPpBmVXT3k5fCW_kWh_ZOGBMuZheuqGA0GPHPL9m9PpV0M2pCu07kZ8Iq8waAtD_EALw_wcB

It gives you all RCA connections and full distribution across several receivers.

thank you, i assumed i had things correctly, as i have been doing as advised by advanced members, i shall try, removing the sherwood, and trying another receiver, one small detail, i have not tryed the stereo music output, only output from tv, and it is digilinked into vo295, i'll kick that around too, thanks again

 

[redd454]

thank you, i assumed i had things correctly, as i have been doing as advised by advanced members, i shall try, removing the sherwood, and trying another receiver, one small detail, i have not tryed the stereo music output, only output from tv, and it is digilinked into vo295, i'll kick that around too, thanks again

Partially good news, it seems all this time, i have been useing tv to test audio, it is a new big screen linked to vo295, with digital cord, bottom line speakers work fine on analog stereo,yet not when i switch remote to dbs/tv, how can i get around this, how can i hoo this new samsung 70" flat screen to play in analog, i had it installed, perhaps the local dealer will know, whew at least i know it will work,due to you advice, making me test the stereo, not only tv thanks, oh wayne, you also were instramental, when you mentioned, analog being the trick, got me to thinking

 

[everettT]

https://www.parts-express.com/parts-express-dac-digital-to-analog-converter-(51-compatible)--180-999

 

[redd454]

https://www.parts-express.com/parts-express-dac-digital-to-analog-converter-(51-compatible)--180-999

Thanks

 

[redd454]

Me again, on my vo295, wich i a'm using two of, one after the other, i have discovered, their is no auxillary in, i can make it to the second receiver,but it would seem to me, i would have to switch source/record out to continue to third, this wold stop the ability to continue, correct? If there are input's i can use on any following receiver's, without, switching source on front pannel,s of second, third amp. Please let me know, don't think it matters on last receiver?

 

[Swerd]

Hard to make heads of tails out of a 193 word sentence...

I have to agree with that!

Not only was it hard for me to makes sense out of the original post because of that lengthy run on sentence, the lack of capitalization, poor spelling and punctuation made matters worse.

But what baffled me the most is this question: Why would anyone want to link four receivers together? Does the OP really want to send one signal through four different receivers? Others did respond as if they understood the purpose. Please fill me in.

 

[redd454]

I have to agree with that!

Not only was it hard for me to makes sense out of the original post because of that lengthy run on sentence, the lack of capitalization, poor spelling and punctuation made matters worse.

But what baffled me the most is this question: Why would anyone want to link four receivers together? Does the OP really want to send one signal through four different receivers? Others did respond as if they understood the purpose. Please fill me in.

Yes, sending original signal through multiplie receiver's is possible, infact i have done this, as advised by member's on this site, my reason for doing this is simple, i wish to use main power on main speaker outlets, on four to five set's of towers, with the multiple receiver's i can seperatly remotely, control each set, in my very large great room, again sorry about punctuation, spelling ect. I was unaware that people being as intelligent as you guy's are unable to get the jest of a conversation, but i will try harder, have stopped abbreviations as asked, not likley i'll use capitals though

 

[Swerd]

Yes, sending original signal through multiplie receiver's is possible, infact i have done this, as advised by member's on this site, my reason for doing this is simple, i wish to use main power on main speaker outlets, on four to five set's of towers, with the multiple receiver's i can seperatly remotely, control each set, in my very large great room, again sorry about punctuation, spelling ect.

Your run-on sentence still forces people to read it several times, just to understand it once. And there is no guarantee that all readers will come to the same understanding.

If you've been able to wire this complex mix of receivers and speakers, as I think I understand it, fine. But you should also be aware it risks problems, avoidable problems.

I was unaware that people being as intelligent as you guy's are unable to get the jest of a conversation, but i will try harder, have stopped abbreviations as asked, not likley i'll use capitals though

Intelligence is also demonstrated by the ability to communicate clearly. Keep trying.

Capitalization really does matter