data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7107f/7107f10f8c987c58312f653375697db58d154117" alt="Mikado463"
Mikado463
Audioholic Spartan
Now before you all want to haul me out behind the woodshed for a proper beating allow me to explain.
I know a large segment of the audiofool community believes heavily in 100's of hours required to burn in, break in, what ever. They claim the greater the surface area between conductor and dielectric requires more time and if the dielectric is teflon that even adds more time, etc
What I would like to know from the EE's here, is there truth and relevance to this ? Myself , I don't recall ever audibly experiencing it , but then I don't know that I really tried. I do believe some folks spend more time trying to listen to their 'gear' than enjoy the music.
I know a large segment of the audiofool community believes heavily in 100's of hours required to burn in, break in, what ever. They claim the greater the surface area between conductor and dielectric requires more time and if the dielectric is teflon that even adds more time, etc
What I would like to know from the EE's here, is there truth and relevance to this ? Myself , I don't recall ever audibly experiencing it , but then I don't know that I really tried. I do believe some folks spend more time trying to listen to their 'gear' than enjoy the music.