Lots of things make it bad.
The cabinet is badly made with a nasty resonance centered on 300 Hz.
The designer can't tune a cabinet and looses an octave between 30 and 60 Hz.
The driver is driven well into break up mode with huge suck out and irregular response. Energy is delayed and stored in the cone causing a boat lot of problems at break up. There is irregular frequency response, time delay and beaming.
To boot the tweeter is playing too loud with excess HF energy.
The reviews must have tin ears or more likely want advertising revenue. I feel confident I could write the frequency response of that speaker in a very short listen.
If you look at the results you see what you would expect, that that 10" driver needs crossing over at 400 Hz and a mid range driver to take the load to somewhere between 4 and 5 kHz.
That speaker is an audiophool lash up if ever I saw one.
Don't mind me bumping this one. I was really interested in how well these perform. I was hoping for more, I admit. I thought it's an all American product (at least that's what they say), I hope things were done properly.
I almost started a new thread with the same topic. I'm glad I didn't as it seems to be no real reason (unless they read AH posts and decided to do something about it

), but I had to bump it.
Here's why; some members post comments with their own recommendations of some speakers that would be "more bang for buck", one of them recommended Gedlee Harper and when I went looking for these I got a ton of pics with some strange erotic fetish




. Basically, it features women nicely dressed in some type of a shorter dress, often sitting with their legs crossed perhaps showing what is literally an iota more than usual. They would probably allow these photos for a year book, That's how innocent it is.
Then, just one decent scroll down and there was on hog-tied in a similar outfit.
Now, that's what I call a speaker that could bring Zu on their feet.

Who the Hell was Gedlee Harper originally and why it became a fetish??