Looking for a very good inexpensive reciver help

T

thegame2004

Enthusiast
Hello I currently have
Klipsch r28f towers
Klipsch R25f center
Klipsch r-15m bookshelfs
Paradigm pdr-10 subwoofer

And I am looking for something that has both dtsx and dolby atmos as I will be making a home theater. Would like something that is very good for the right price.

Thanks in advance.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
What speaker configuration are you looking to be able to handle?
 
M

Mark of Cenla

Full Audioholic
Go to accessories4less.com and look for receivers with your feature/connection desires. Good luck. Peace and goodwill.
 
T

thegame2004

Enthusiast
What speaker configuration are you looking to be able to handle?
Looking for something that has 7.2 or 9.2 not sure at the moment because I eventually want to add ceiling speakers aswell
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
Looking for something that has 7.2 or 9.2 not sure at the moment because I eventually want to add ceiling speakers aswell
Figuring out that now might be a good idea, as it can definitely make a difference....7.1.2 or 7.1.4 or 9.1.4 ?
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Hello I currently have
Klipsch r28f towers
Klipsch R25f center
Klipsch r-15m bookshelfs
Paradigm pdr-10 subwoofer

And I am looking for something that has both dtsx and dolby atmos as I will be making a home theater. Would like something that is very good for the right price.

Thanks in advance.
There are no good inexpensive receivers. A receiver is a complex piece of electronics and cheap ones are junk. Cheap purchases always end up being the most expensive ones.
 
J

jmalecki05

Junior Audioholic
Depending on your price range, I would say forget about Atmos and anything else beyond 7.1; especially sub $500. Aside from a few outliers, the less expensive receivers will not drive all of those speakers without noticeable distortion. (This is especially true in the Dolby and other theater modes where volume is typically less than stereo given the same db level on your receiver.) Prior to HDMI, I used a Yamaha htr-5730 (was about $250 12-15 years ago) and sounded great in my 16 X 11 bedroom. Years later, I used a Pioneer vsx-522 (about $250 in 2011) to drive the same speakers in a 3.1 setup in a carpeted basement; also sounded great.

If you want Atmos or more than a 5.1 setup, make sure that each channel can handle the speakers you are using at all frequency ranges, not just the 1khz that manufacturers love to use in marketing. Also, look for THD less than 0.1% for the entire frequency range. Features aside (bluetooth, streaming, Apple whatever, other nonsense) price matters with getting a receiver (which is both the brains and the muscle of the system).
 
Last edited:
T

thegame2004

Enthusiast
There are no good inexpensive receivers. A receiver is a complex piece of electronics and cheap ones are junk. Cheap purchases always end up being the most expensive ones.
WOW, that is an amazing setup for sure, I will be looking around into getting a 7.2 channel reciver.
 
T

thegame2004

Enthusiast
Depending on your price range, I would say forget about Atmos and anything else beyond 7.1; especially sub $500. Aside from a few outliers, the less expensive receivers will not drive all of those speakers without noticeable distortion. (This is especially true in the Dolby and other theater modes where volume is typically less than stereo given the same db level on your receiver.) Prior to HDMI, I used a Yamaha htr-5730 (was about $250 12-15 years ago) and sounded great in my 16 X 11 bedroom. Years later, I used a Pioneer vsx-522 (about $250 in 2011) to drive the same speakers in a 3.1 setup in a carpeted basement; also sounded great.

If you want Atmos or more than a 5.1 setup, make sure that each channel can handle the speakers you are using at all frequency ranges, not just the 1khz that manufacturers love to use in marketing. Also, look for THD less than 0.1% for the entire frequency range. Features aside (bluetooth, streaming, Apple whatever, other nonsense) price matters with getting a receiver (which is both the brains and the muscle of the system).
I am looking into getting a setup for either Atmos or dtsx, but why would you think it isn't worth doing just wondering as it will help me make my decision. I am just trying to set up for the future.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
Whether an avr's amp section will run a full complement of speakers without distortion would depend on the speakers' sensitivity and the spl levels you're driving them to, but at lower levels with appropriate speakers most avrs will not automatically be sent into distortion; most avrs are more similar in power output than not.

If you're willing to do the speakers in the ceiling thing I think Atmos and the other "immersive" techs may be worth it. I'm not going that route as it would be a pain to put speakers in my ceiling...

You being in Canada does change things as far as recommendation of A4L and many others. Not familiar with Canadian discount houses, let alone if you have a refurb retailer like A4L.

Unless your location is stated otherwise usually you'll get US-based reco's around here, might want to put it in your avatar/signature or something....
 
A

ANovice

Audiophyte
I have a similar question, so thought it would be best to use a running thread to ask which of these would be best as an "inexpensive" receiver knowing as TLS Guy said, there is no such thing.

Still, I am on a budget with my main priority is the best sound quality, 4K upscaling for an aspiring 5.1 system, with 7.1 dreams (atmos, dts-x really not necessary)
So given my basic needs, does it make sense to go higher than the Denon S910W, and if so, how much higher among the options listed?
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
Choose for the features/connectivity you want/need at the price you like.....
 
S

SoundSolace

Audiophyte
I was also looking to have Atmos and DTS X incorporated into my HTS but also budget conscious as I'm building a complete theater from scratch. I did a bunch of research on receivers and came across the Onkyo TX-NR646. There's a good amount of positive reviews and it has Atmos and DTS X. I was able to get it under $400 and it provides 100 watts per channel which should be enough for my SVS Prime speakers. I'm not a audiophile and still don't have my system setup so I can't speak to performance. With that said it seems to be the best entry level quality receiver for Atmos etc.
 
T

thegame2004

Enthusiast
I was also looking to have Atmos and DTS X incorporated into my HTS but also budget conscious as I'm building a complete theater from scratch. I did a bunch of research on receivers and came across the Onkyo TX-NR646. There's a good amount of positive reviews and it has Atmos and DTS X. I was able to get it under $400 and it provides 100 watts per channel which should be enough for my SVS Prime speakers. I'm not a audiophile and still don't have my system setup so I can't speak to performance. With that said it seems to be the best entry level quality receiver for Atmos etc.
I was looking at that receiver has some good features for the price. There are a few others but they are going for over 1200 hundred is it really worth spending that kind of money I don't know yes you do get what you pay for. At the same time it's more or less going for what you want. I want to utilize the newest formats and would either setup for atmos or dtsx.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top