Ok , I do agree with you on current mindset of disposable everything (which is obviously wrong), but fraud shouldn't be the norm.
Fraud should be something actively fought against.
In one of links I gave an example of google search results - it provides useful results almost always on first page or likely your query wasn't very good.
Fakespot using a bit of fancy sophistication provides great insight on honesty of amazon reviewers.
What I have a problem with is few people that mentioned to me - I don't need no stinking algorithms to tell me if review is real or not. I could do it myself. like this one:
https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g1-i12105-k8465871-o110-Review_censorship-TripAdvisor_Support.html#79950485
The problem with this approach is very problematic since it's not uncommon to find busy properties with thousands of reviews. good luck reading all of them.
Mark this is what you are saying here, if I'm correct is the same thing.
I think it's antiquated and wrong approach and we could do better. I guarantee most of these fake reviews are written by bots (computer programs) and TA (and others) should be able to do better job of sifting this garbage automatically by an algorithms. TA is sitting on 250 MILLION of reviews. It's huge pile of big data and yet they are not doing anything with it, except now they even no longer claim that all reviews are real from real people. They now even started to book hotels directly - which makes them not any different from sites like Hotels.com,Expedia (etc...) I personally see that people were tricked to write reviews for Independent entity only to bait and switch and become just another online booking but with buttload of "trusted" reviews in place.