maybe i wasn't clear enough, i don't want to use the integrated amp as a power amp only.
I want to feed the PM8005 with a network streamer NA6005 and a UD7007 analog connected to pm8005 for cd playing and hdmi connected to sr7010 for blu rays. So music directly to pm8005 as an integrated amp, and TV - blu ray - media player directly to 7010 using 8005 only as poweramp for FL/FR.
The question is if the 8005 is a good sonic upgrade for 2 channel music over the 7010, or i have to step up to get audible diference.....
all the above, if we agree that an integrated amp is superior for music than an AVR .... (i thought that was not under question...)
What is the room size (all dimensions, not just floor area)? How is it treated, acoustically? What volume level is used for most listening? What kinds of furnishings are in the room?
Compare the preamps and if one has advantages, maybe you could use it for two channel audio, but if there's little/no difference, there's no good reason to add an integrated amp. Most power amps sound very similar, but I think more of the more obvious differences come from the preamp. If anything, the usual reason was that it had its own power supply and using a separate tuner somehow taxed the supply, which is really not an issue. In years past, receivers didn't get the attention to details that an integrated or separates did, they were designed to hit price points. That really hasn't changed, but the number of channels in a receiver has- the AVR you have has 9 channels of amplification and the specs show the output power with one and two channels driven. While the specs from most manufacturers leave a lot to be desired, the AVR should be able to do what you expect the integrated amp to do, as long as you run it in two channel mode. The only way to know if the integrated amp will be better is by doing a direct comparison, in your room, with your equipment.