
AcuDefTechGuy
Audioholic Jedi
Assuming the VIZIO costs $200 more than the SONY, which TV would you buy?
Not a factor.I'm guessing HDR is not a contributing factor?
I think the picture quality look about the same.Why not buy both locally and get the one you want and return the other?
I'd think they would be of similar quality. Purchasing with an amex card will double the manufacturers warranty or for about $100 per $1k for a 5 year extended.I think the picture quality look about the same.
Of course, the bigger screen is nice.
I was wondering about reliability, built quality, etc.
yeah but the 65" doesn't come with binoculars to help you see the small picture.Be advised that most large screen Vizios are Home Theate Displays with NO built in TV tuner. The Sony has tuner and is a TV. The Vizio will require purchase of TV tuner. Recent professional reviews indicate excellent picture quality on the Vizios. Just know what you are getting. Good luck.
I think the picture quality look about the same.
Of course, the bigger screen is nice.
I was wondering about reliability, built quality, etc.[/QUOTE
I rely on certain experts that are credible. I have been impressed with Vizio's picture display over past few years. Again, Brent Butterworth highly recommends Vizio. It is his number one recommended TV for picture quality.
If quality, reliability with no major difference in picture quality, bigger screen is always nice but whichever one satisfieds my needs and wants along with extended warranty cost would be the deciding factor.I think the picture quality look about the same.
Of course, the bigger screen is nice.
I was wondering about reliability, built quality, etc.
I know, but the 70" M-Vizio also costs a lot more money ($1900 vs $1200).I told you , the M-series is better than the E-series.