I agree with alot of what you are saying, but the problem I'm having with this bluetooth issue is not whether or not marantz made the receivers or not- the problem exists from a complete lack of quality control. These issues with the shitty, sporadic bluetooth playback, and the wifi thing-- they happened within the first day or so of being used. The slightest bit of quality control testing would have encountered these issues. There is no excuse for the products being shipped out in this condition.
Before I actually made the purchase, I was looking around on other AVS message boards and I had discovered a long-going thread about bricking issues with the SR5009 that our SR5010 is based on, where a lot of people's units were freezing constantly and some completely bricking up, a lot were within the first few days or weeks of use- again, a shocking lack of quality control. By the time I stumbled upon the thread, marantz had already resolved the issue via firmware, but it was still disturbing to read.
I just want to throw out there that beyond this bluetooth issue, I like the unit. Its got a great look, a solid, sturdy build/feel to it, and for what I mainly use it for (high end gaming/media pc attached to a 7.1 home theater setup) its great, I have no complaints. But when I am at work (I work remotely at home) where I can't use the inputs from my PC, my only alternative is the bluetooth, and for it to constantly be shitty/useless for long stretches of time- I can't overlook it.
Again, this all comes down to what I stated above- Yes, they make high quality audio equipment, but Marantz is still the kind of company that advertises features on a box based on them physically being there, without testing to see if they actually work or not. To justify this or rationalize it in any way is anti-consumer to the core- I understand they didn't make the receivers, but the product has their name on it, and at the end of the day, they are the ones responsible for ensuring their product does what they advertise it does. I agree with you-- if you can't do something right, don't do it-- but Marantz is more interested in finding a reason to make their products more expensive so they can squeeze more money out of the consumers. They need to drop the broken/wifi units and drop the prices on them to account for it. Some of their receivers are 2000 dollars and can't play bluetooth properly? That is crazy!
I am going to keep the receiver, but as soon as I even think its going bad or that something else is wrong with it, I will replace it without hesitation. I will never buy one of their products in the future, however, and if Denon is made by the same people I will never buy one of those either. I don't mean to sound like an asshole, but if marantz doesn't even care about their products, why should I?