Roku 3 vs Amazon Fire TV: Old Bull vs Young Bull and no Easy Decision
I have been using the Roku 2 since it first came out and added the Roku 3. When I thought the Roku 3 went DOA I picked up the Fire TV from Amazon and now that I have had a chance to play with both, I thought I would give my impressions.
Build Quality: (ROKU 3)
The newest version of Roku spots more rounded edges but is essential the same design and before
• Glossy Finish
• HDMI / Ethernet / Memory card Slot / USB on the side
• Tends to run a little bit on the warm side compared to the Fire TV
• Remote, while bulky, does add that nice headphone option and I like the feel of the buttons
• About 25% smaller form factor than the Fire TV
• 512MB Memory, improved CPU(Dual core 900Mhz) from previous generations
• Includes headset
Build Quality: (Amazon Fire TV)
• More traditional square design, bigger, but thinner than the Roku 3
• Comes with remote and power cord
• Ads TosLink Port for people who still don’t use HDMI
• No memory expansion slots
• Quad Core 1.7Ghz CPU with Andreno 320 CPU (Same GPU as Galaxy IV Phone)
• Mic and voice recognition built into remote
ADVANTAE: AMAZON FIRE TV
Remote Quality:
Voice Search vs Built in Headphones, what is more important to you
ADVANTAGE: TIE
SUPPORTED VIDEO FORMATS:
• Both Support the same video formats at 1080p 60FPS and can output Dolby Digital Plus 7.1(Limited to content providers) and not lossless
• Fire TV also supports MPEG4-SP, and VC1 which the Roku does not, so slight edge:
ADVATAGE FIRE: TV
SUPPORTED WI-FI
• Both units support a/b/g/n (Dual Band), but only the Kindle fire supports MIMO:
ADVANTAGE: FIRE TV
GAME FUNCTIONALITY:
• This is a complete runaway for the Amazon Fire TV, you have a full featured Android Gaming device capable of running a large library of games like a champ.
ADVANTAGE: FIRE TV
Supported Content:
Hands down this goes to the Roku 3 as the Fire TV has a lot of catching up to do in this area Having used the roku for a few years, the selection is insane on both published and what I like to call the “bootleg” channels. These are channels that are not really published on the normal menus but you can find via google searches…no its not porn, though I guess they have those too
Fire TV just can’t measure up in this area, but being the new kid on the block, they are growing. For me they were missing key apps like VUDU which I have amassed a significant library. Also I like to use Spotify because they have the best sound quality and excellent selection of music. No HBO Go and missing many more apps that Roku 3 has in spades. This may change over time, but it is going to take a long time to catch up
HUGE ADVANTAGE: ROKU 3
INTERFACE:
• Roku 3’s interface many have not changed much over time, but is;
o Simple to use
o Easy to customize
o Lots of flexibility
o Ability to search for movies over a ton of providers;
i.e. Looking to Watch Lego Movie it will list all providers who have the movie and cost. They cover all the major providers like Amazon, Netflix, Vudu, M Go etc.
This come in handy when some movies may be free on Netflix or Amazon Prime, but cost on other providers and have saved me some expense over time
• Amazon Fire TV
o I would describe it as a hot mess,
Steeper learning curve, not as user friendly or customizable as Roku 3
Adding apps is a little confusing at first and does take more time to do
Searching for movies etc, does not cover all the different providers (pretty much Amazon Prime
o Voice Search works and it works well, but again does not cover all content providers
ADVANTAGE: ROKU 3
Performance:
• I don’t think it will surprise many that the Fire TV with its faster processor and more memory performs better
o Movies launch almost instantly, FF / RW work better
o Voice Search works extremely well
• That being said, the Roku 3 is no slouch, while not as fast as the Fire TV, it is still a very quick and usable interface and the difference in launching movies is not very significant
ADVANTAGE: FIRE TV
At the end of the day you have two different devices designed at delivering content, but doing it in very different ways which almost dictates that the end user determines what features are most important before picking up a device.
Amazon Fire TV Customer:
Someone who needs the latest technology and can be patient enough for the OS and content to mature. Puts a lot of value on the Voice Driven interface and consider using it as a gaming device, as you can purchase actual game controllers for it. Because it’s part of the Android Ecosystem, has a solid CPU/GPU with 2GB RAM, there is a lot of opportunity to grow.
ROKU 3 Customer:
Content is King and the Roku doesn’t fail to deliver. Like using its simplistic and easy customizable interface and much more established search tool. It is by far the most complete content streaming the device and has a lot of user support
Additional Notes:
I use Vudu a lot because at the time they were the only streaming service that did 7.1 Dolby Digital and was extremely disappointed when I discovered that FIRE TV didn’t have it.
What I uncovered that is many of the movies you buy are Ultra Violet and can be transferred over to FLIXSTER, which the FIRE TV has. I have tried this and been successful. Note that not all movies are Ultra Violet and very few TV programs, so you will miss some of the content
I am an Amazon Prime user and it was nice that the untit was delivered ready to start watching right away, I didn’t have to input my account information. Nice Little Touch!
• My TVs are smart TVs so it is starting to become less and less required to use one of the devices,
My personal preference right now is the ROKU 3, just because the content is there that I use. Spotify, Amazon, Netflix, Vudu M-Go, etc. While I could return the fire TV I have deiced to hang on to it and play around with it some more. Should it start to gain the apps that I use, It would become my full time streaming device. I can forgive the search and menu customizations for the voice recognition and quicker streaming.