Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Bi-wiring Part 2: The Cable Conundrum

  1. #11
    Roger K is offline Audiophyte Roger K is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default Bi Wiring Comparison

    The bi-wiring scheme that is wired discreetly to HF and LF sections potentially has more insertion loss to the woofer because the LF section contains more of the typical music spectrum (power-wise) but must recieve it through double the impedance vs if the cables are connected at both ends.

  2. #12
    caper26's Avatar
    caper26 is offline Full Audioholic caper26 is looking for a job at AH
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Annapolis Valley, NS
    Posts
    283
    Thanks Given
    39
    Thanks Received
    77

    Default

    I didn't read through all the nause, and was unable to open and look at the circuit diagram, but I am assuming that the diagram doesn't go back far enough inside the receiver to account for the distance from the actual AMP circuit to where the cable is EVENTUALLY split into 2, whether that be near the amp terminals or the speaker terminals.... if you have sufficient gauge wire (mono) then bi wiring makes no sense. If you want experiment with the minimum gauge wire possible for mono/bi-wire, then I think it might...if the run was sufficiently long. my 2 cents.
    47LG55 LCD | Yamaha RX-V565 | HD DVR | PS3 | Wii | 2 X Trio12 DIY subs | 3 X Energy Take FPS, 2 VS Surrounds (SS), 2 X Take LCR (SB)
    Upstairs: 2 X RC-70, Yamaha RX-V863, Monitor Audio RX-w12 Sub
    Bathroom: 2 X Energy Take LCR
    Car: Sony Xplod HU | Xplod 6X9s | Kenwood 4"s | Alpine Type S 12" sub | Rockford Fosgate Amp | Legacy Amp

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •