I guess when they gave them both 5 star, they might have factored in the price difference (bang for buck). May be you should email them about this.
Makes perfect sense to me. If price wasn't factored in, would high value entry level bookshelves be given only 1 star? It only makes sense to me that price is factored in. For instance, should a Toyota Corolla only be given 1.5 star, because there are Rolls Royces and other exotics, let alone the 80K cars, 50K cars, and 30K cars? I think not.
At what price points does sound quality show a significant improvement? For example, hometheater.com gave both the Pioneer BS22 and the KEF R300 a "5 star performance" rating, yet I find it hard to believe that these two speakers would be even in the same ball park. I realize the BS22 has been highly praised, but I was wondering if going to a higher price bracket, say $500/pair for bookshelf speakers, would lead to a noticable increase in sound quality?
Still, it's a good question. You know the Pios get SO MUCH PRAISE, that I was half expecting them to be better than anything. Then, and I don't even remember who said it, but someone was thinking that Ascend 170SE should be a better speaker. I really like the 170SE, and even though I'd still personally want even better for my main rig(s), it was almost surprising to hear someone say that the Pios were not necessarily better. But it shouldn't be surprising because there is definitely a price delta. Sometimes there is just a lot of hype/chatter/praise/etc. Great values are great values, no doubt, but money will get you a better speaker, in the hands of the same and/or skilled designer. I'm sure AJ's TADs are still a lot better than the BS22. They both can't receive 5 stars can they, if price was NOT factored in?