This has been discussed on this forum before.
The rule has been that normal heat generated from a receiver will not cause any loss in sound quality or performance, because the heat generated is within the operational limits of the unit.
The majority of heat generated by receivers is from the transistors in the amp. These are bolted to the giant (usually aluminum or steel) heat sinks in the receiver. Transistors, because they're a simple device, can operate at very high temperatures without ill effect. For example, the junction temperature of a common amp transistor that you can pick up from radio shack is around 150 degrees Celsius (302 degrees Fahrenheit). This is why our receivers put out so much heat.
Most units are designed using convection cooling. The heat sink fins are lined up vertically, which causes the hot air to rise out the top of your receiver pulling in cool air from the bottom and over the heat sink fins. This is why it is never recommended to place your receiver on top of any device that might generate -any- heat.
Most fans that ARE in receivers are used to actively cool more heat sensitive components like DSPs and other ICs. These devices, because their logic gates are so small (we're talking microns) heat can cause a gate to not toggle or even burn up. As you could imagine, this would not make the software running on that platform very stable, so most modern "high power" IC's (Genesis FLI-23xxx, Computer Processors, GPU's) require active cooling.
Luckily, the majority of receivers incorporate audio processors and DSPs that are smaller and have a low level of power loss, making them generate less heat. Because of this, they're able to maintain full operation while only being passively cooled.
I also completely agree with j_garcia's reply, I was only expanding on your question of why most receivers DON'T use active cooling, while other home theatre devices do.