I'm interested in this question too - dual subs for a 100% music system. Why unpowered over the powered version - more control perhaps? I've been toying around with either 2 x Rythmik F15HPs or 2 x Funky Waves 18.0C. Part of me also wonders if 2 x 18"s would be overkill for music only. In short, subscribed!
I don't think it's overkill at all. My room is only 15' x 18' x 15' and I don't think my dual Funk 18.0 is overkill for music.
Why unpowered over powered? I can think of a few reasons.
1. Price. Dual powered 18.0 is ~ $6400. Dual unpowered 18.0 is ~ $4000.
2. Amps are cool. I love using my own amps. If I had Krell, I would use Krell to power my Funk 18.0. I feel confident that amps like ATI, Parasound, Adcom, NAD, Outlaw, Sunfire, Rotel, etc, are better quality than any plate amps inside subs, which are no better than pro amps. My dual Funk 18.0 are powered by my AT3002 amp (450WPC/ 4 ohms).
3. Pro amps are cheap. A Crown XLS 1500 (550 WPC, no EQ, w/ Limiter) is $350 new, much less used. A new Crown XTi 1002 is $448 (500 WPC w/ EQ & Limiter). I never use active EQ for subs or speakers (except Orion, but it is set to default/ flat). And I see no reason to use more than 500 WPC for myself. My previous Rythmik subs had like 450watts and I always turned off the EQ and Limiter.
4. I've seen enough people with blown internal sub amps who ended up having to wait weeks to get replacements.
5. Some expensive flagship subs actually use unpowered subs w/ external amps, like the $15,000 Focal Utopia sub and the new Flagship Funk 18.2 sub.
6. I don't like the feeling of putting an amp inside or attached to a big vibrating sub. External amps can have better ventilation and less physical vibration.