EMPtek ES1010i Subwoofer Review

A

admin

Audioholics Robot
Staff member
The EMP ES1010i subwoofer is a compact dual 10" ported sub with 250 watt amplifier combining beautiful aesthetics with competent performance. NO this sub won't win any output or extension wars. If that is your primary goal, then look elsewhere, but also realize you will likely be getting a large pedestrian black box with little to no WAF at this price point (and even possibly higher). The ES1010i does deliver solid bass performance at a modest price without requiring a forklift to move it or without occupying too much precious floor space since it's taller than it is deep. It blends perfectly with their matching E5Tti or E55Ti towers, but can also work extremely well with small satellite speakers due to its rather extended upper frequency response. This sub produces nice thick bass for its modest size and price and has an off the charts WAF. $499 delivered to your door with a generous 30 day return policy seems about right to me and I surely hope you agree if you’re looking to add some boom with style to your system. The ES1010i earns our Audioholics Bassoholic "Small" room rating making it ideal for 1,500 ft^3 listening space or slightly larger rooms for users not concerned with achieving full-scale reference levels.


Discuss "EMPtek ES1010i Subwoofer Review " here. Read the article.

Go here if 2nd page isn't showing up for you: http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/speakers/subwoofers/emptek-es1010i/emptek-es1010-introduction
 
Last edited by a moderator:
T

the_phew

Enthusiast
Gene,

This sub appears to achieve nearly identical performance to the Emotiva Ultra-12, while costing the same. The Emo is more compact, but the EMP is definitely more attractive, so it probably comes down to priorities for the user.

Despite the similarities, I noticed that Clint gave the Ultra-12 a Value rating of 5, but you only gave the ES1010i a Value rating of 4.

I own some Impression series speakers in Red Burl, and to me the major selling point is the aesthetics/price ratio. I think you need to move up to Monitor Audio Platinum, Salk, or the now-defunct Mirage OMD series to get an equivalent or better-looking veneer, all of which are several times the price of the EMPs.

Since the performance/price ratio of the Impression Series seems to be in-line with other offerings, the fact that the aesthetics/price ratio is off the charts should bolster the 'value' rating. Especially since an equally-performing ugly black box from Emotiva got the top value rating.
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
Gene,

This sub appears to achieve nearly identical performance to the Emotiva Ultra-12, while costing the same. The Emo is more compact, but the EMP is definitely more attractive, so it probably comes down to priorities for the user.

Despite the similarities, I noticed that Clint gave the Ultra-12 a Value rating of 5, but you only gave the ES1010i a Value rating of 4.

I own some Impression series speakers in Red Burl, and to me the major selling point is the aesthetics/price ratio. I think you need to move up to Monitor Audio Platinum, Salk, or the now-defunct Mirage OMD series to get an equivalent or better-looking veneer, all of which are several times the price of the EMPs.

Since the performance/price ratio of the Impression Series seems to be in-line with other offerings, the fact that the aesthetics/price ratio is off the charts should bolster the 'value' rating. Especially since an equally-performing ugly black box from Emotiva got the top value rating.
Now that we are being more stringent in how we evaluate subs, it's forced me to be a bit more critical in the ratings. We've also had time since the Ultra 12 to further study offerings in this price point which again made us re-evaluate our ratings.

Also, the Ultra12 eventually came down in price far below $499 before it was discontinued.

Both are good values for the money and I've heard both directly. I'd still give the performance nudge to the EMP if you can accommodate its larger size.
 
T

the_phew

Enthusiast
Thanks for the reply Gene. What are some other competitive ~$500 subs that make any attempt to look good? i.e. features like a wood/gloss veneer, curved cabinet, etc.

It seems like these features don't start to appear until the ~$750+ range with other offerings.
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
Thanks for the reply Gene. What are some other competitive ~$500 subs that make any attempt to look good? i.e. features like a wood/gloss veneer, curved cabinet, etc.

It seems like these features don't start to appear until the ~$750+ range with other offerings.
at $499, there are subs from Rythmik, HSU and Epik that likely produce more usable output below 30Hz but I don't think any of them match the aesthetics of the EMP sub and they all require more floorspace too.
 
A

ack_bak

Audioholic
Nice review Gene, this is really a gorgeous looking subwoofer. This sub may actually solve the problem I have in my family room. My wife has pretty much told me that I can do what I want in our downstairs media room, but she is 100% against "a big black box" in our family room on the main floor.

I think this sub will pass the WAF test, and when I do watch some TV upstairs, it will give me the bass that I am looking for.

I also noticed these subs sometimes are sold as "B" stock and I may just watch for one of these to go on sale.

I was very impressed with the build quality and components used. EMPtek does not seem to have cheaped out on this budget subwoofer.
 
timoteo

timoteo

Audioholic General
The only thing that worries me about the EMP is that those types of nice finishes arent cheap. So if the company spent extra money on the finish then they had to skimp out somewhere else to keep the cost down....driver?...amp? Thats all there is left.

Whereas yes, Emotiva, HSU, Rythmik etc may offer the "ugly black box" but the money has been spent on quality parts & performance engineering. I prefer quality & performance over looks myself. Not to say the EMP didnt perform well for its price, its the components used in question.

Gene, did you remove the driver or amp & have a look around?
(i havent read the entire review so if the answer is in there dont bother replying)

I would love a sub to look great, perform great & have top notch materials but at this price you have to pick & choose 1 or 2 of the 3.
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
The only thing that worries me about the EMP is that those types of nice finishes arent cheap. So if the company spent extra money on the finish then they had to skimp out somewhere else to keep the cost down....driver?...amp? Thats all there is left.

Whereas yes, Emotiva, HSU, Rythmik etc may offer the "ugly black box" but the money has been spent on quality parts & performance engineering. I prefer quality & performance over looks myself. Not to say the EMP didnt perform well for its price, its the components used in question.

Gene, did you remove the driver or amp & have a look around?
(i havent read the entire review so if the answer is in there dont bother replying)

I would love a sub to look great, perform great & have top notch materials but at this price you have to pick & choose 1 or 2 of the 3.
The finish is NOT a real wood veneer so the cost may not be as high as you think. EMP seems to have found the right balance between performance and aesthetics based on my findings when reviewing this sub. The dominant limiting factor in this sub is its small box size. If they would have made it a little taller, then performance would have been even better. But, then you also have a bigger box to contend with.
 
A

ack_bak

Audioholic
The only thing that worries me about the EMP is that those types of nice finishes arent cheap. So if the company spent extra money on the finish then they had to skimp out somewhere else to keep the cost down....driver?...amp? Thats all there is left.

Whereas yes, Emotiva, HSU, Rythmik etc may offer the "ugly black box" but the money has been spent on quality parts & performance engineering. I prefer quality & performance over looks myself. Not to say the EMP didnt perform well for its price, its the components used in question.

Gene, did you remove the driver or amp & have a look around?
(i havent read the entire review so if the answer is in there dont bother replying)

I would love a sub to look great, perform great & have top notch materials but at this price you have to pick & choose 1 or 2 of the 3.
Judging by the pics Gene posted in the review, it looks like solid build quality and good components. For my media room, I totally agree with you, performance wins out. But in my family room that is 99% decorated by my wife? Performance will take a back seat, and this sub will perform well for my limited television viewing. Lots of guys in the same situation.
 
K

keagy

Audiophyte
Gene, did EMP make the port change based your input, or from testing of the sample units before the production run? Do you think I got the updated port design if I received my ES1010i back in November?
 
D

DS-21

Full Audioholic
No numbers from Josh Ricci?

One thing your review puts into stark relief is the unfortunate necessity for enthusiasts to personally verify the performance of pretty much everything one buys for one's audio system. Quality control seems simply non-existent in the industry right now.

A consumer would likely never know that her/his unit had shipped with the wrong woofer installed.
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
No numbers from Josh Ricci?

One thing your review puts into stark relief is the unfortunate necessity for enthusiasts to personally verify the performance of pretty much everything one buys for one's audio system. Quality control seems simply non-existent in the industry right now.

A consumer would likely never know that her/his unit had shipped with the wrong woofer installed.

My review unit was pre-production (first article sample). I trust EMP will have good quality control with actual products shipping. Part of the problem with us scooping reviews due to the popularity of this site and manufacturers wanting reviews ASAP, is we often are the guinea pigs of this type of scenario. Most of our competition wouldn't even realize this happens since they don't objectively measure product performance or take stuff apart for closer examination.
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
Gene, did EMP make the port change based your input, or from testing of the sample units before the production run? Do you think I got the updated port design if I received my ES1010i back in November?
Yes I bugged them to increase the port length so its a new change as of last month going forward on all new products shipping today as far as I known.

EMP is offering existing customers FREE port extensions (minus shipping) if you want to retrofit your product with the longer ports for increased low end bass response should you have an older model.
 
Last edited:
S

slammin86

Audiophyte
Yes I bugged them to increase the port length so its a new change as of last month going forward on all new products shipping today as far as I known.
You should bug them to come up with a nice single 15" ported sub with 500-600 watts and a heavily built cabinet with the same finish as the rest of the impressions line.

lol...one can always dream right?
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
You should bug them to come up with a nice single 15" ported sub with 500-600 watts and a heavily built cabinet with the same finish as the rest of the impressions line.

lol...one can always dream right?
you may not have to dream too long. :D
 
R

raynist

Junior Audioholic
Gene, did you change out the ports on this sub or did they send you another unit?

I purchased one back in dec as part of a package but never used it. I was considering selling it, but either way would like the updated ports.

Thanks
Ray
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
Gene, did you change out the ports on this sub or did they send you another unit?

I purchased one back in dec as part of a package but never used it. I was considering selling it, but either way would like the updated ports.

Thanks
Ray
the extensions were added after the fact and it's relatively easy to do yourself.
 
D

DS-21

Full Audioholic
Most of our competition wouldn't even realize this happens since they don't objectively measure product performance or take stuff apart for closer examination.
Sadly, that is true.
 
T

the_phew

Enthusiast
Stereophile wouldn't have noticed the incorrect driver impedance or port size, but they would have expounded on how this sub is "buttery, with a silkiness that bordered on ethereal".

Or more likely, they never would have reviewed it in the first place, instead trying to pitch the latest $10k interconnect or 'cable riser'.

Audioholics is the BEST!
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top