About time, Samsung has already admited it in no uncertain terms.
admin should be listened to
Tucked away in the latest Terms of Service for the PlayStation Network, and other associated websites, is a lovely little section that seems to confirm issues raised by Audioholics' Editorial: WARNING: 3D Video Hazardous to Your Health. The consumer electronics giant seems to suggest that, in its current form as with past attempts, consumer grade 3D video may be a source of sundry maladies that cause discomfort of the eyes and digestive tract, but more importantly may result in improper vision development in young children.
Discuss "Sony Surreptitiously Confirms 3D Eyestrain Problems" here. Read the article.
About time, Samsung has already admited it in no uncertain terms.
I have seen the 3D offerrings from Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic. Far and away, Panasonic has the best 3D. Not only is their picture sharp and free of flicker, I don't get a headache when watching it.
Sony is by far the worst. The main reason being the flicker that I see when wearing the glasses. Within a couple of minutes I had a pounding headache.
URC MX-980 Remote with MRF-350 RF Base Station / Monoprice 4x2 HDMI Matrix / Yamaha RX-V2700 / Panasonic DMP-BD60 Blu-Ray / HTPC with Ceton InfiniTV 4 CableCard Tuner / Xbox 360 / Panasonic TC-P54G25 1080p Plasma / Mitsubishi HD-1000 Projector / 92" FAVI Motorized Screen / DIY Speakers and Rythmik Audio DS1500 Sub
timmay8612 is gaining some recognition
I have a hard time imagining watching movies with dorky glasses on.
The Gear:
Paradigm Monitor 7 Left & Rights
Paradigm CC-150 Center
Paradigm Atom Surrounds
SVS PC12-NSD
Onkyo TX-SR601
MDS should be listened to
Ditto to both...
I think I must be one of the few that just don't see the allure of '3D' in the home.
Can you imagine spending $5,000 to buy a dozen or so 3D glasses so you have enough for everybody to come over to your house for movie night? It's not going to happen...