Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Parasound Halo CD 1 Holm-Designed CD Player Preview

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow Parasound Halo CD 1 Holm-Designed CD Player Preview

    Parasound introduced the Parasound Halo CD 1, a high-end CD player that uses new CD playback and processing technology that is the result of a collaboration between Parasound and Holm Acoustics in Copenhagen, Denmark. The Parasound CD 1 uses a new method for playing CDs that is based on using a CD ROM drive instead of a conventional CD drive and a Linux-based computer to read and process the CD data. The CD ROM drive in the CD 1 runs at 4 times the speed of a conventional CD player drive in order to accumulate a vast amount of data. An on-board Intel ITX computer, running the Linux operating system kernel and Holm's proprietary software dramatically improves the reading of CD disc data. It analyzes CD data and reads every part of a CD as many times as are needed to significantly reduce errors and, accordingly, the negative effects of error concealment. The result is a nearly bit-perfect data stream.


    Discuss "Parasound Halo CD 1 Holm-Designed CD Player Preview" here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    scattershot is offline Junior Audioholic scattershot is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    76
    Thanks Given
    28
    Thanks Received
    7

    Default

    It amazes me that there is still a market for CD players costing over a $1000 dollars (in this case $4500!)

    A consumer would be far better off building a HTPC with a high quality sound card and digitizing their entire collection (as lossless audio) while enjoying the benefits of HDtracks (far superior sound to CD) while pocketing the few thousand dollar difference to enjoy a 5 star all inclusive vacation in Mexico.

    Just my two cents, was blown away to see that someone was still charging thousands of dollars for a CD player...

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to scattershot For This Useful Post:

    gene (01-08-2013),Steve81 (01-08-2013)

  4. #3
    gene's Avatar
    gene is online now Supreme Audioholics Overlord gene should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,818
    Thanks Given
    819
    Thanks Received
    2,401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scattershot View Post
    It amazes me that there is still a market for CD players costing over a $1000 dollars (in this case $4500!)

    A consumer would be far better off building a HTPC with a high quality sound card and digitizing their entire collection (as lossless audio) while enjoying the benefits of HDtracks (far superior sound to CD) while pocketing the few thousand dollar difference to enjoy a 5 star all inclusive vacation in Mexico.

    Just my two cents, was blown away to see that someone was still charging thousands of dollars for a CD player...
    This is especially true when you can already get PERFECT sound reproduction from the Oppo BDP-105 that happens to be 1/4th the price and BTW also happens to play EVERY current audio and video format with equal prowess!
    Gene DellaSala
    President, Audioholics
    Pursuing the truth in audio & video...

  5. #4
    Irvrobinson is online now Audioholic Field Marshall Irvrobinson should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,583
    Thanks Given
    309
    Thanks Received
    754

    Default

    The Emotiva ERC-2 uses a CDROM drive, and it was very clunky and noisy, so much so it was one of the reasons I sold it at a loss. Of course, the Emotiva was relatively cheap, not $4500. I would hope Parasound's drive is much more refined.

  6. #5
    cpp's Avatar
    cpp
    cpp is online now Audioholic General cpp should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lexington SC/Orlando Fla
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanks Given
    250
    Thanks Received
    322

    Default

    I found this other article on this new player: Parasound Halo CD1
    In that article there is something about some NEW CD-ROM drive they use as compared to a CD drive which must have been back in the early times of cd players.. I would think all modern CD players use a CD-ROM based drive so what's the deal with this $5000 player as opposed to say and OPPO players or any decent player on the market. Heck my Rega sounds as good as my OPPO
    #1 Vincent Sp-331mkII amp, ATI 2002, Quicksilver's Mid Mono amplifier(2), Wyred for Sound STP-SE, (pre-amp), Rogue 99 Pre-amp, Jolida JD-9A, Micro Seiki bl-91, Kef 104.2, Usher be718, Rega Apollo, Sony xA5400ES, #2 Win7, Synology DS413 NAS w/Seagate 4 -2TB HHD, JRiver17, EE DAC Plus, Mytek DSD DAC, Genelec 8030A,Kef140
    : #3 HT; Denon 4311Ci,GE Triton 2's, Sat50C, Sat3's, Rythmik D15se, OPPO-95,





  7. #6
    Irvrobinson is online now Audioholic Field Marshall Irvrobinson should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,583
    Thanks Given
    309
    Thanks Received
    754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cpp View Post
    I would think all modern CD players use a CD-ROM based drive so what's the deal with this $5000 player as opposed to say and OPPO players or any decent player on the market. Heck my Rega sounds as good as my OPPO
    Most CD/DVD/BD players do not use CDROM drives, they use 1x speed slide-drawer drives. Computers went to slot-loaded drives for robustness in office environments, and speed multiplication for better performance. Speed multiplication is irrelevant for entertainment content, and I would argue it's a bad thing, because faster drives make more noise. Slot-loaded drives are slower because there's a mechanism that has to grab the disk and position it on a spindle, and that generally takes longer than closing a drawer. CDROM drives also have longer loading times because some low-cost (and therefore low performance) function in the drive has to recognize the disc format and figure out what speed to spin it.

    The Oppo 105, for example, does not use a cheap computer CDROM drive. It uses a rather expensive, sliding drawer design, with extensive isolation and noise reduction features, and appears to only work at 1x the target disc speed.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Irvrobinson For This Useful Post:

    gene (01-09-2013)

  9. #7
    cpp's Avatar
    cpp
    cpp is online now Audioholic General cpp should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lexington SC/Orlando Fla
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanks Given
    250
    Thanks Received
    322

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irvrobinson View Post
    Most CD/DVD/BD players do not use CDROM drives, they use 1x speed slide-drawer drives. Computers went to slot-loaded drives for robustness in office environments, and speed multiplication for better performance. Speed multiplication is irrelevant for entertainment content, and I would argue it's a bad thing, because faster drives make more noise. Slot-loaded drives are slower because there's a mechanism that has to grab the disk and position it on a spindle, and that generally takes longer than closing a drawer. CDROM drives also have longer loading times because some low-cost (and therefore low performance) function in the drive has to recognize the disc format and figure out what speed to spin it.

    The Oppo 105, for example, does not use a cheap computer CDROM drive. It uses a rather expensive, sliding drawer design, with extensive isolation and noise reduction features, and appears to only work at 1x the target disc speed.
    Agree Irv so what makes this Parasound so much better or about $3300.00 better. I just don't get it but maybe it is because there are some folks somewhere that still think high dollar CD players are better than some lower ticket player and will pay the price for a CD player. Who knows.
    #1 Vincent Sp-331mkII amp, ATI 2002, Quicksilver's Mid Mono amplifier(2), Wyred for Sound STP-SE, (pre-amp), Rogue 99 Pre-amp, Jolida JD-9A, Micro Seiki bl-91, Kef 104.2, Usher be718, Rega Apollo, Sony xA5400ES, #2 Win7, Synology DS413 NAS w/Seagate 4 -2TB HHD, JRiver17, EE DAC Plus, Mytek DSD DAC, Genelec 8030A,Kef140
    : #3 HT; Denon 4311Ci,GE Triton 2's, Sat50C, Sat3's, Rythmik D15se, OPPO-95,





  10. #8
    Irvrobinson is online now Audioholic Field Marshall Irvrobinson should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,583
    Thanks Given
    309
    Thanks Received
    754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cpp View Post
    Agree Irv so what makes this Parasound so much better or about $3300.00 better. I just don't get it but maybe it is because there are some folks somewhere that still think high dollar CD players are better than some lower ticket player and will pay the price for a CD player. Who knows.
    I have no idea what makes the Parasound better, other than it is prettier and some pride of ownership factor. What makes an Omega watch better than a Wenger, or a Seiko for that matter? For some people look and feel is a factor, and I admit I'm not immune to it, though I use a cheap Tascam CD drive myself.

  11. #9
    cpp's Avatar
    cpp
    cpp is online now Audioholic General cpp should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lexington SC/Orlando Fla
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanks Given
    250
    Thanks Received
    322

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irvrobinson View Post
    I have no idea what makes the Parasound better, other than it is prettier and some pride of ownership factor. What makes an Omega watch better than a Wenger, or a Seiko for that matter? For some people look and feel is a factor, and I admit I'm not immune to it, though I use a cheap Tascam CD drive myself.
    No doubt some marketing hype being applied, but hey that's business.
    #1 Vincent Sp-331mkII amp, ATI 2002, Quicksilver's Mid Mono amplifier(2), Wyred for Sound STP-SE, (pre-amp), Rogue 99 Pre-amp, Jolida JD-9A, Micro Seiki bl-91, Kef 104.2, Usher be718, Rega Apollo, Sony xA5400ES, #2 Win7, Synology DS413 NAS w/Seagate 4 -2TB HHD, JRiver17, EE DAC Plus, Mytek DSD DAC, Genelec 8030A,Kef140
    : #3 HT; Denon 4311Ci,GE Triton 2's, Sat50C, Sat3's, Rythmik D15se, OPPO-95,





  12. #10
    slipperybidness's Avatar
    slipperybidness is online now Audioholic General slipperybidness should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,266
    Thanks Given
    29
    Thanks Received
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irvrobinson View Post
    Most CD/DVD/BD players do not use CDROM drives, they use 1x speed slide-drawer drives. Computers went to slot-loaded drives for robustness in office environments, and speed multiplication for better performance. Speed multiplication is irrelevant for entertainment content, and I would argue it's a bad thing, because faster drives make more noise. Slot-loaded drives are slower because there's a mechanism that has to grab the disk and position it on a spindle, and that generally takes longer than closing a drawer. CDROM drives also have longer loading times because some low-cost (and therefore low performance) function in the drive has to recognize the disc format and figure out what speed to spin it.

    The Oppo 105, for example, does not use a cheap computer CDROM drive. It uses a rather expensive, sliding drawer design, with extensive isolation and noise reduction features, and appears to only work at 1x the target disc speed.
    You make it seem like CDROM drives are only the slot-load type. CDROM drives also come in drawer-load varieties.

    Maybe that isn't what you meant? But that's kind of how I interpreted it.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •