Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Sony BDP-S350 Blu-ray Player to Support BD-Live

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow Sony BDP-S350 Blu-ray Player to Support BD-Live

    Sony has announced it’s shipping the BDP-S350 Blu-ray player that’ll support all the promised features for the new format. The good news it’s going for $400, making a new BD player even more attractive.


    Discuss "Sony BDP-S350 Blu-ray Player to Support BD-Live" here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    AVTguy is offline Audioholic Intern AVTguy is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    29
    Thanks Given
    4
    Thanks Received
    12

    Default Finally, an entry level Blu-Ray worth having...

    Well it's taken a while, but it looks like HT owners will finally be able to get a solid stand alone Blu-Ray player without having to break the bank.

    Props to Sony for getting it right with their 3rd generation player.

    Can't wait to see one of these things in the retail stores.

  3. #3
    ned
    ned is offline Full Audioholic ned is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    352
    Thanks Given
    33
    Thanks Received
    8

    Default

    No internal decoding of DTS-MA and no 5.1 analog out = no sale.

    It doesn't decode TrueHD. No source direct either. I'm not sure if this is worth waiting for. The S300 at least have 5.1 analog outs. With this you are doomed to upgrade your receiver which negates the point of being an entry level.
    Last edited by ned; 07-17-2008 at 07:10 PM.
    Front: NOW RBH 1266 SER, 661 LSE modified, 61 LSE, 441 se, 641 se
    Rears: RBH 66se, 41se
    SUB: SVS, Emo

  4. #4
    croseiv's Avatar
    croseiv is offline Audioholic Samurai croseiv should be listened to
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Somewhere on planet Earth
    Posts
    2,383
    Thanks Given
    695
    Thanks Received
    595

    Default

    I think it does do TrueHD decoding, just not DTS-MA. Incidentally, DTS-MA audio hs been causing some issues with Yamaha and Onkyo's newer receivers (Very LOUD pops that can damage speakers).

  5. #5
    ned
    ned is offline Full Audioholic ned is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    352
    Thanks Given
    33
    Thanks Received
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by croseiv View Post
    I think it does do TrueHD decoding, just not DTS-MA. Incidentally, DTS-MA audio hs been causing some issues with Yamaha and Onkyo's newer receivers (Very LOUD pops that can damage speakers).
    According to some users it can but the manual says it can't. The loud pop has been corrected by recent software update.
    Front: NOW RBH 1266 SER, 661 LSE modified, 61 LSE, 441 se, 641 se
    Rears: RBH 66se, 41se
    SUB: SVS, Emo

  6. #6
    Emusica is offline Audioholic Emusica is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    134
    Thanks Given
    40
    Thanks Received
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ned View Post
    No internal decoding of DTS-MA and no 5.1 analog out = no sale.

    Ditto on that...

  7. #7
    Drag0nFly is offline Enthusiast Drag0nFly is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    And what about SACD capability? I guess that is too much to ask from one of the companies that actually originated the format?

    Sigh. No sale. And don't give me that "music on Blu is coming and it will be great yada, yada". SACD with its 2.82 Mhz sampling rate and DSD mastering process is already lightyears ahead of any quality DTS Master Audio / Dolby TrueHD equivalent. Besides, Blu is a video format, and this would just introduce even more consumer confusion.


    I also found the following statement quite amusing:

    A slimmer profile looks better in your component rack and its compact size requires less packaging.
    No, actually, it would look kind of odd in my rack. I also prefer heavier, more rock-solid models, and I guess I'm not alone in this since this is a highly subjective matter.
    Last edited by Drag0nFly; 07-18-2008 at 07:22 AM. Reason: -

  8. #8
    allargon's Avatar
    allargon is offline Audioholic General allargon should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,129
    Thanks Given
    145
    Thanks Received
    185

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ned View Post
    No internal decoding of DTS-MA and no 5.1 analog out = no sale.

    It doesn't decode TrueHD. No source direct either. I'm not sure if this is worth waiting for. The S300 at least have 5.1 analog outs. With this you are doomed to upgrade your receiver which negates the point of being an entry level.
    Those of you wanting full decoding and 7.1 analog will need to wait for the Sony BDP-S550 this summer unless Samsung decides to add DTS-HD HR/MA decoding to the BD-UP5000. (I think the Sony DAC's will be a good bit better than the Samsungs.) (Seriously, PCM is going away. Why waste analog outputs on players that don't decode all audio formats at this stage of the game?)

    Engadget wasn't very kind to this player.

    http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/h...d-frivolities/

  9. #9
    gliz's Avatar
    gliz is offline Full Audioholic gliz has a small fan club
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    dallas
    Posts
    284
    Thanks Given
    57
    Thanks Received
    28

    Default

    $400....thats gas money
    "A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." -- Gerald Rudolph Ford

  10. #10
    ned
    ned is offline Full Audioholic ned is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    352
    Thanks Given
    33
    Thanks Received
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allargon View Post
    (Seriously, PCM is going away. Why waste analog outputs on players that don't decode all audio formats at this stage of the game?)

    Engadget wasn't very kind to this player.

    http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/h...d-frivolities/
    I'm not sure your logic there, it's a receiver issue rather that an audio format.
    Front: NOW RBH 1266 SER, 661 LSE modified, 61 LSE, 441 se, 641 se
    Rears: RBH 66se, 41se
    SUB: SVS, Emo

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •