I am on the brink of setting-up a "home theatre" of sorts and want to get it right first time. I will basically be converting a suitable carpeted formal lounge into an A/V room which will include installing a 42" Panasonic Viera Plasma, Atlantic Technology 422 12" Sub and B&W Series 600 centre speakers and ceiling mounted surrounds (8") to add to my existing tower B&W CDM7 NT's driven by a Marantz SR 7200...... primarily for viewing/listening to music (DVD's and CD's)....Classical,Fusion Jazz, "light" Rock, and popular folk (Dire Straits,Beatles,CS&N, Queen,Supertramp, Bob James,David Sanborn etc).
I'm pretty settled on the TV, it's the sound side (Sub-woofer) that's needing conviction since I have been advised by another audiophile that I'd be wasting my money. He contends that the B&W's can hold sufficient base and deliver ample quality sound across the range, without the need for or the assistance of a sub and that, primarily for music listening/watching, a sub would introduce too much base at the expense of the overall quality/balance of the sound currently being delivered through 2 channels.
I know too little about such things to disagree with the audiophile although from what I've read and have gleaned from Audioholic threads and postings, the addition of a sub is the way to go.
Sure, I understand that the best thing to do is to have the muso's install the sub (and surrounds)on trial and then listen to it. I have already done the shop-studio thing and of course it sounds great in their ideally constructed situation. My home plans call for ceiling mounted surrounds, so I'm not going to be able to do a comparable "listen".
Any comments from informed member sources will be appreciated.
Basil