Johnny Canuck said:
Warpdrive. i heard them side by side. You can say you like the Senns. To me, the Grado's were fantastic. Senn's are muddy. The 225's are not as bright as the 125's. Like speakers, headphones are an individual thing. I like treble. I like detail. I like the Grados.
JC
I used to like my SR225's too, I went to the store and heard the whole range of Grado's all the way up to the RS-1. As I listened to more of my music at home, I realized they were distorting even my best recordings with harshness in the treble, and fatigued me. My ears could only take that 10dB treble spike for so long. The Grado's are colored. If that's your preference, who am I to argue. Some people like boosted bass, some people like boosted treble. I prefer to strive for an more accurate sound
When I heard the Beyer's, I knew the days of the Grado's were numbered, the Beyers do everything the SR225 does, a bright lively sound, better details, but without the harshness or edge that the Grado's have.
Note: I don't own any Sennheisers. I'm familiar with all of the Grado's and most of the Senns. I don't like either actually. Like you I prefer a brighter headphone, but the Grado's and Senns being too far left and right in the sound signature....I prefer a more neutral but still lively headphone. That's why I own Etymotics, AKG and Beyer headphones, no Senns or Grados (once I sell it)
And I will bring it up again, the Senns have just as much detail, in fact more. If you took a Senn 580, EQ boosted the treble the same amount (10dB), you would actually hear more details that the Grado. The Grado doesn't actually resolve that much detail, it just gives the illusion of detail due to its artificial treble. I do recommend the Senn 580 for the reason that its detail is excellent, and its soundstage is far better than any Grado, even the RS-1. Grado's collapse the soundstage too much.